cytg111
Lifer
- Mar 17, 2008
- 26,849
- 16,113
- 136
WHAT?You got nothing, no decent response to facts so you do the Democrat thing which is lie and make false charges.
WHAT?You got nothing, no decent response to facts so you do the Democrat thing which is lie and make false charges.
You got nothing, no decent response to facts so you do the Democrat thing which is lie and make false charges.
Fact, Devil's Triangle is not a drinking game, it's a threesome with 2 guys and Brett lied about it. You know the self proclaimed virgin.You got nothing, no decent response to facts so you do the Democrat thing which is lie and make false charges.
At 3:18 in this link. Clear perjury if her ex is telling the truth.she testified under oath that she had never helped anyone prepare for a polygraph examination.
I just read the letter. Care to list some of those holes? All I see is ex indicated he didn't see some things she claimed. She admitted during that time she didn't admit to the assault.
It's an area off the coast of Bermuda.Fact, Devil's Triangle is not a drinking game, it's a threesome with 2 guys and Brett lied about it. You know the self proclaimed virgin.
Fact
We dont know what she did. This guy has no skin the game, at all.she testified under oath that she had never helped anyone prepare for a polygraph examination.
And that's why someone was editing the Wiki definition in real time while Kavanaugh was lyin….I mean testifyingIt's an area off the coast of Bermuda.
The Devil's Triangle (1973) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0071416/
or a drinking game
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-changes-during-kavanaugh-hearing/1453087002/Soon, the Wikipedia page for Devil's Triangle had a new definition: "a popular drinking game enjoyed by friends of judge Brett Kavanaugh." The entry was later removed, and at least one revision appears removed from the public archives.
Devil's Triangle (disambiguation) Wikipedia article edited anonymously from US House of Representatives https://t.co/D3poeTGMuKpic.twitter.com/oB74iOxzBS
— congress-edits (@congressedits) September 27, 2018
Another entry on the Wikipedia page showing a history of revisions reads: "Do not add the hoax about a 'drinking game,' especially as related by Brett Kavanaugh."
The question was asked "besides you attorneys did you discuss how to take a polygraph". Clearly that question was in context of taking a test before her testimony. The ex described 1992-1998 waaaaaaaaay before any of this was considered. According to him she gave advice as someone who has a background in psychology. That has nothing to do with the test she took 26 years later.At 3:18 in this link. Clear perjury if her ex is telling the truth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OFBBDuB7Q8
Has anyone seen that picture of Ford at 15? There is no way any handsome, popular young man would have wanted to hit that, even if he was drunk.
And that's why someone was editing the Wiki definition in real time while Kavanaugh was lyin….I mean testifying
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-changes-during-kavanaugh-hearing/1453087002/
I just read the letter. Care to list some of those holes? All I see is ex indicated he didn't see some things she claimed. She admitted during that time she didn't admit to the assault.
We dont know what she did. This guy has no skin the game, at all.
Yes, I’m sure she started a secret campaign in 2012 to smear Kavanaugh in 2018 so she could cash in.
Do you guys hear how insane you sound?
Hey Skippy, Wiki has the IP addresses and they identified the location as Capital Hill. Think the Dems did it?
That would be like claiming Republicans leaked Ford's letter to the press.
I know, in the old Navy, before their culture of drinking was curbed, a "steamer" was a sailor that was pretty much a functioning alcoholic.
Are you talking about the Kavanaugh GoFundMe? Fucking ridiculous, right?
Skis could be code for cocaine. I believe he never directly answered Booker when pressed on that specific.
True that. 100%.That is from the transcript. So, in the event it can be proven she has done otherwise, she has perjured herself. So, there is valid reason to investigate her ex's claims and I'm sure they will be.
The ex has made a written declaration. So, if she lied about that, what else did she lie about? We need to get to the bottom of all of it and now, unfortunately, she is going to be more scrutinized than she had probably counted on.
What does that have to do with my post? They raised 700K and I wondered how much her lawyers were skimming?
Are you so simple you can't follow along?
I'd like to know if Kav's name appears in her psychiatrist's medical file and if so, when it was entered. If it was a very recent entry, that would be suspicious. If she fabricated her story, out of political motivation, not saying she did, it will come to light. Lots of stones being turned right now and should be.
Her lawyers are working pro bono bunky.
I know that is what they "said"...
That doesn't mean that is what is going to actually take place. Creative billing. After all they are lawyers and seedy ones at that. Just look at the way they are using this woman. Pathetic.
Agreed.Well, now that it has come to light that she may not have been 100% truthful in her testimony, there will be an FBI probe. Count on it.
