Kavanaugh SCOTUS Senate Judicial Hearing

Page 234 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
You got nothing, no decent response to facts so you do the Democrat thing which is lie and make false charges.

Sure thing 'boom boom'

trump-grenade.jpg
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,936
33,595
136
You got nothing, no decent response to facts so you do the Democrat thing which is lie and make false charges.
Fact, Devil's Triangle is not a drinking game, it's a threesome with 2 guys and Brett lied about it. You know the self proclaimed virgin.

Fact
 

sao123

Lifer
May 27, 2002
12,656
207
106
I just read the letter. Care to list some of those holes? All I see is ex indicated he didn't see some things she claimed. She admitted during that time she didn't admit to the assault.

the ever changing story of who and how many were present at this ficticious party. The ever changing story of what year it was and how old she was.

The bullshit pseudo science explanation of "The neurotransmitter epinephrine, Ford explained, “codes memories into the hippocampus, and so the trauma-related experience is locked there" why i can remember a single detail, but clearly forget EVERYTHING else about that entire day.

I dont need to repeat all that I've already posted.
https://forums.anandtech.com/thread...dicial-hearing.2553510/page-170#post-39590833
 
  • Like
Reactions: SMU_Pony

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,936
33,595
136
It's an area off the coast of Bermuda.
The Devil's Triangle (1973) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0071416/
or a drinking game
And that's why someone was editing the Wiki definition in real time while Kavanaugh was lyin….I mean testifying
Soon, the Wikipedia page for Devil's Triangle had a new definition: "a popular drinking game enjoyed by friends of judge Brett Kavanaugh." The entry was later removed, and at least one revision appears removed from the public archives.

Devil's Triangle (disambiguation) Wikipedia article edited anonymously from US House of Representatives https://t.co/D3poeTGMuKpic.twitter.com/oB74iOxzBS

— congress-edits (@congressedits) September 27, 2018
Another entry on the Wikipedia page showing a history of revisions reads: "Do not add the hoax about a 'drinking game,' especially as related by Brett Kavanaugh."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-changes-during-kavanaugh-hearing/1453087002/
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,936
33,595
136
At 3:18 in this link. Clear perjury if her ex is telling the truth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OFBBDuB7Q8
The question was asked "besides you attorneys did you discuss how to take a polygraph". Clearly that question was in context of taking a test before her testimony. The ex described 1992-1998 waaaaaaaaay before any of this was considered. According to him she gave advice as someone who has a background in psychology. That has nothing to do with the test she took 26 years later.

Nice try.
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,444
5,852
146
And that's why someone was editing the Wiki definition in real time while Kavanaugh was lyin….I mean testifying

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-changes-during-kavanaugh-hearing/1453087002/

They still think that they can make shit like that true just by claiming it and editing Wikipedia. They're not even trying to be transparent about it. I guess we see exactly what Republican plan is, spread FUD. And they're making sure that they'll refrain from attacking Ford directly publically, but that's because they know they can rely on whipping up their useful idiots. If 4Chan really wanted to troll, they'd figure out who the people that are starting all these things (pizzagate, wasn't Q started on there? this new claim on Ford, the Ford and Clinton fake pic, I think the Seth Rich stuff, the white supremacist "trolling", I'm sure I'm forgetting dozens) on there are, and then own the shit out of them. But perhaps its already gone the opposite.
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,112
930
126
I just read the letter. Care to list some of those holes? All I see is ex indicated he didn't see some things she claimed. She admitted during that time she didn't admit to the assault.
We dont know what she did. This guy has no skin the game, at all.

Well, here is her testimony from the hearing:

MITCHELL: Have you ever had discussions with anyone, beside your attorneys, on how to take a polygraph?

FORD: Never.

MITCHELL: Had — have you ever given tips or advice to somebody who was looking to take a polygraph test?

FORD: Never.

That is from the transcript. So, in the event it can be proven she has done otherwise, she has perjured herself. So, there is valid reason to investigate her ex's claims and I'm sure they will be.
The ex has made a written declaration. So, if she lied about that, what else did she lie about? We need to get to the bottom of all of it and now, unfortunately, she is going to be more scrutinized than she had probably counted on.
 
Last edited:

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,416
5,019
136
Yes, I’m sure she started a secret campaign in 2012 to smear Kavanaugh in 2018 so she could cash in.

Do you guys hear how insane you sound?

What does that have to do with my post? They raised 700K and I wondered how much her lawyers were skimming?

Are you so simple you can't follow along?
 
  • Like
Reactions: imported_tajmahal

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,416
5,019
136
Hey Skippy, Wiki has the IP addresses and they identified the location as Capital Hill. Think the Dems did it?

That would be like claiming Republicans leaked Ford's letter to the press.

I wouldn't put it past the dems to do it... Look at all the other crap they are pulling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: imported_tajmahal

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,849
16,113
136
That is from the transcript. So, in the event it can be proven she has done otherwise, she has perjured herself. So, there is valid reason to investigate her ex's claims and I'm sure they will be.
The ex has made a written declaration. So, if she lied about that, what else did she lie about? We need to get to the bottom of all of it and now, unfortunately, she is going to be more scrutinized than she had probably counted on.
True that. 100%.
Cause truth matters.
Right?

ps. we also agree that context matters? Could you not interpret the line of questioning as if Ford had discussed with anyone, besides her lawyers, how SHE should take a poly? As in, did someone prep her for this poly?
 
Last edited:

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,112
930
126
I'd like to know if Kav's name appears in her psychiatrist's medical file and if so, when it was entered. If it was a very recent entry, that would be suspicious. If she fabricated her story, out of political motivation, not saying she did, it will come to light. Lots of stones being turned right now and should be.
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
I'd like to know if Kav's name appears in her psychiatrist's medical file and if so, when it was entered. If it was a very recent entry, that would be suspicious. If she fabricated her story, out of political motivation, not saying she did, it will come to light. Lots of stones being turned right now and should be.

Yes you are.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,416
5,019
136
Her lawyers are working pro bono bunky.


I know that is what they "said"...
That doesn't mean that is what is going to actually take place. Creative billing. After all they are lawyers and seedy ones at that. Just look at the way they are using this woman. Pathetic.
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
I know that is what they "said"...
That doesn't mean that is what is going to actually take place. Creative billing. After all they are lawyers and seedy ones at that. Just look at the way they are using this woman. Pathetic.

Pathetic, yeah, look in a mirror bunky.
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,112
930
126
Well, now that it has come to light that she may not have been 100% truthful in her testimony, there will be an FBI probe. Count on it.