Irrelevant? Bullshit, the reason the Democrats haven't investigated the accusation is because the accusation itself is all they want, the facts might screw it up for them. That's why they sat on the information for so long and still haven't aided in any investigation.
That's what I thought. That's not what soundforbjt said though. Thanks.I believe his claim was that he has never been "black out drunk" from FOX interview/other statements but he did admit to having beers and sometimes "too many".
Screw off asshole. It's a perfectly valid observation that the Democrats have done nothing at all to investigate the claim and they've had 2 months to do it.
I loved the calendar. Party week, party this weekend, get "skis", party, weekend away, weekend away, party, get-together, weekend away. Really helped.
No, according to the Senate majority leader the senate staff has been investigating the alleged incidents since the Republicans found out about them. You are the liar here.Irrelevant. You made a claim that the Republicans were attempting to find out facts about this case. This is obviously untrue.
You lied and you got busted. Now you're trying to divert instead of owning it like an adult.
He never claimed that. Link or lie?Wait a minute, I thought he once claimed that he wasn't even in town that year? No time to party?
Mitchell is doing her job and is known for her sympathetic soft touch with victims. She should not be cross examining Dr. Ford, that is not her job.Wonder if the GOP calculated the risk of Mitchell believing Ford and, if she did, how that would color her questions to Kavanaugh.
Cause I'm starting to feel like she believes her. She has extensive experience with victims.
Who does Mitchell represent? Seriously, is she representing the Republican caucus, the committee as a whole, the chairman? Who is her client? The answer makes all the difference in how she should proceed.Wonder if the GOP calculated the risk of Mitchell believing Ford and, if she did, how that would color her questions to Kavanaugh.
Cause I'm starting to feel like she believes her. She has extensive experience with victims.
No, according to the Senate majority leader the senate staff has been investigating the alleged incidents since the Republicans found out about them. You are the liar here.
That must have been Bart OKavanaugh I was thinking about...That's what I thought. That's not what soundforbjt said though. Thanks.
No, according to the Senate majority leader the senate staff has been investigating the alleged incidents since the Republicans found out about them. You are the liar here.
No, according to the Senate majority leader the senate staff has been investigating the alleged incidents since the Republicans found out about them. You are the liar here.
Her client is the American people, her role is to referee a Senate pissing match.Who does Mitchell represent? Seriously, is she representing the Republican caucus, the committee as a whole, the chairman? Who is her client? The answer makes all the difference in how she should proceed.
I'm comfortable with calling you a liar every time i catch you doing it. Which is pretty frequently in this forum.If that is the case why have they not asked the federal government's premier investigative entity to help them? Why have they not called any of the other witnesses? The answer to this is obvious, it's that they don't want to know.
It's weird that you continue to lie about something even after it's shoved in your face. You're disturbingly comfortable with bald faced lies.
Wait a minute, I thought he once claimed that he wasn't even in town that summer? No time to party?
I'm sure they've been trying to dig up dirt on Ford in an effort to discredit her.
Hard to see you up on that horse.No, because there has been ample prosecuted and documented evidence of systemic abuse in the church along with cover ups that trace back to the Vatican. There are patterns of behavior from credible accusers.
You’ll notice I’ve not questioned Dr. Ford’s account and felt it was important for her to testify. The Ramirez claim is questionable. The Avenatti client is irresponsible, which is why the Democrats have not exactly embraced him.
Doubtful, Trump would take that as a loss and Trump hates losing more than anything else. He needs Kavanaugh to keep him from impeachment.It's clear she's telling the truth. The GOP's only "credible" defense was that she is a liar, which she is clearly not. Now what will their defense be?
-The GOP withdraws the Kavanaugh nomination and try to ram through another before the midterms. Maybe not a sharknado, but certainly a tsunami and may keep some of their base. If they're smart, this is what they'll do.