• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Kavanaugh SCOTUS Senate Judicial Hearing

Page 128 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
ecogen said:
I don't see why I should be polite to people who pull facts out of their ass and then use said facts to support their arguments. And I wouldn't have been so aggressive about it if this was the first time you did this.

You and some other smartasses here pull this shit all the time. Want to stop being treated like an ass? Try not acting like one.
Click to expand...
Salty. You don’t have to be polite. You’ve done an excellent job at being something else.
 
DisarmedDespot said:
Goddamn, I understand the congressional Republicans having no choice, but why are you guys so vehemently defending Kavanaugh? What do you think is more likely:

1) There's a masterful Democrat-backed conspiracy to discredit Kavanaugh that was planned years in advance, and which they never sprung on Gorsuch for some reason
2) Kavanaugh was a shitty nominee

It's not THAT hard to find a decent conservative judge to fill the spot, and if they stop farting about they might still manage it before the midterms, or in a worst-case scenario during the lame duck session. Why is this guy the hill you want to die on so badly?
Click to expand...

I think the real reason the Republicans are saying this is a conspiracy is because (if the tables were reversed and the Democrats were trying to confirm a justice they didn't like) they probably can imagine their own leadership conspiring to smear that nominee. They are so morally bankrupt that they can only imagine that others are just as corrupt and morally bankrupt.
 
compuwiz1 said:
I? You are a pathetic and desperate person. Why Merrick Garland was not confirmed has been discussed over and over. Sorry if you're too thick to get it. Hint...Joe Biden set that precedent. Thank him for some of your problems.
Click to expand...
Remind me again the name of the SC nominee Joe Biden refused to grant a hearing.
 
DisarmedDespot said:
Goddamn, I understand the congressional Republicans having no choice, but why are you guys so vehemently defending Kavanaugh? What do you think is more likely:

1) There's a masterful Democrat-backed conspiracy to discredit Kavanaugh that was planned years in advance, and which they never sprung on Gorsuch for some reason
2) Kavanaugh was a shitty nominee

It's not THAT hard to find a decent conservative judge to fill the spot, and if they stop farting about they might still manage it before the midterms, or in a worst-case scenario during the lame duck session. Why is this guy the hill you want to die on so badly?
Click to expand...

Because they're so insecure they think admitting you're wrong is a sign of weakness, even when you're doing it to total strangers on the internet while hiding behind anonymity.
 
compuwiz1 said:
No we don't. If these allegations are not proven, the left should not be allowed to bully this into a win for them. Absolutely should stand their ground. So, pound sand. If he is proven guilty, I will be one of the first to say step aside, but until then no.
Click to expand...

Think a little deeper. Think about the SCOTUS itself & how we, the People, need to feel about it. We need to respect it & even have a little reverence about it. Kavanaugh won't bring that to the Court at all.

Is that what you want to win? A SCOTUS diminished in the eyes of the People?
 
DisarmedDespot said:
Goddamn, I understand the congressional Republicans having no choice, but why are you guys so vehemently defending Kavanaugh? What do you think is more likely:

1) There's a masterful Democrat-backed conspiracy to discredit Kavanaugh that was planned years in advance, and which they never sprung on Gorsuch for some reason
2) Kavanaugh was a shitty nominee

It's not THAT hard to find a decent conservative judge to fill the spot, and if they stop farting about they might still manage it before the midterms, or in a worst-case scenario during the lame duck session. Why is this guy the hill you want to die on so badly?
Click to expand...

Because, as I pointed out earlier, it *might* help Republican turnout in the midterms? GOP can ignore Trump's failures and foment all the anger and outrage and vitriol they want against Feinstein and her conniving Democrats.
 
K1052 said:
Alcohol seems to be the thru line here on everything. Certainly possible his memory is impaired when highly inebriated (seemingly a frequent occurrence despite his self portrait) but at his age you've got to think he knows what he's capable of when drunk.

Regardless the responsibility is still his.
Click to expand...

You know, that's a really good attack line to take.

Not only question his tendency to give false statements, also question the strength of his denials since he was so often drunk, can we really expect him to remember much accurately.
 
DisarmedDespot said:
Goddamn, I understand the congressional Republicans having no choice, but why are you guys so vehemently defending Kavanaugh? What do you think is more likely:

1) There's a masterful Democrat-backed conspiracy to discredit Kavanaugh that was planned years in advance, and which they never sprung on Gorsuch for some reason
2) Kavanaugh was a shitty nominee

It's not THAT hard to find a decent conservative judge to fill the spot, and if they stop farting about they might still manage it before the midterms, or in a worst-case scenario during the lame duck session. Why is this guy the hill you want to die on so badly?
Click to expand...

You are talking to a cult that believes Hillary Clinton was the greatest criminal mastermind in the world who has yet to face justice for the many crimes she has committed.

In other words you aren't dealing with people who have a full deck.
 
ivwshane said:
Post it up, piece of shit. Show me where I've ignored anything. I'm simply calling you out on your bullshit. Stop posting bullshit and people will stop calling you out on it.
Click to expand...
I already did. You accused me of being a hermit with no experience and went on one of your usual dismissive water boy bitch rants, yet I linked an article that backed my assertion and explained my experience in dealing with the victims of gang rape. Doesn’t make me an expert and I had the honesty to correct my post when asked to.

What is your point of reference besides your @sshole waterboy?
 
DisarmedDespot said:
Goddamn, I understand the congressional Republicans having no choice, but why are you guys so vehemently defending Kavanaugh? What do you think is more likely:

1) There's a masterful Democrat-backed conspiracy to discredit Kavanaugh that was planned years in advance, and which they never sprung on Gorsuch for some reason
2) Kavanaugh was a shitty nominee

It's not THAT hard to find a decent conservative judge to fill the spot, and if they stop farting about they might still manage it before the midterms, or in a worst-case scenario during the lame duck session. Why is this guy the hill you want to die on so badly?
Click to expand...

And if they were so masterful, where the fuck where they back in 2016 when Ds last everything to the pussy grabber?
 
I just heard an old classmate of Kavanaugh's say that if even one drugging and gang rape took place, it would have been known, in that small community, let alone if it were ten. She said that is absurd and not the Brett Kavanaugh she knows. A woman would not defend a rapist, if she had any knowledge of any such happenings. A bunch of women don't get repeatedly raped and nobody says anything. They also wouldn't continue to go back for more.

Michael Avenatti, bring your shit and testify to congress under oath. I dare you!
 
Here’s an idea, we get Kavanaugh shit/faced drunk, lock him in a room with a couple of hot women and watch him through a two-way mirror. Sounds like fun.
 
compuwiz1 said:
To that I say, either prove it, or get off the man's back. He should not be bullied into stepping, down, by the left, if the allegations are not able to be proven. I will reserve the presumption of innocence or guilt until after I hear the testimony from both sides. Many here are not willing to do that. If this is going to be the norm, the processes are going to be screwed up from here on out.
Click to expand...
Get real. The Republican senate will make sure they bear false witness against her and already have by refusing to use the FBI to impartially investigate. You pretend to remain sceptical of all claims until the evidence is in and that very evidence is being denied to those women. They are willing and have passed polygraph tests. Is the asshole willing to do that. Your fucking blindness is evident to me. Only the brain dead won’t call a duck a duck when all the data points in that direction. Your phony impartiality will not affect normal people with ordinary common sense.
 
compuwiz1 said:
I just heard an old classmate of Kavanaugh's say that if even one drugging and gang rape took place, it would have been known, in that small community, let alone if it were ten. She said that is absurd and not the Brett Kavanaugh she knows. A woman would not defend a rapist, if she had any knowledge of any such happenings. A bunch of women don't get repeatedly raped and nobody says anything. They also wouldn't continue to go back for more.
Click to expand...
Odd, Judge’s girlfriend from high school says that those types of parties went on and Judge told her about them.
 
compuwiz1 said:
I just heard an old classmate of Kavanaugh's say that if even one drugging and gang rape took place, it would have been known, in that small community, let alone if it were ten. She said that is absurd and not the Brett Kavanaugh she knows. A woman would not defend a rapist, if she had any knowledge of any such happenings. A bunch of women don't get repeatedly raped and nobody says anything. They also wouldn't continue to go back for more.
Click to expand...
Now apply this to Hillary.
 
Starbuck1975 said:
I already did. You accused me of being a hermit with no experience and went on one of your usual dismissive water boy bitch rants, yet I linked an article that backed my assertion and explained my experience in dealing with the victims of gang rape. Doesn’t make me an expert and I had the honesty to correct my post when asked to.

What is your point of reference besides your @sshole waterboy?
Click to expand...

Oh that must be why you posted a correction admitting to your error. An error that everyone but you saw from the beginning. Aka you were called out on your bullshit! You then doubled down with another one of your brilliant statement, which mirrors the Republicans talking point as wel as the president's (good job water boy), saying you wondered why parents didn't report anything. I tried explaining to you why such thinking was ridiculous but it was lost on you, like a lot of things.

You are that fucking stupid! Self pwnage for the win!

"Almost always" = 60% of the time! = you claims being verified! Lol, this dumb ass bitch!
 
Republicans have made a Faustian bargain they cannot turn away from. Many of them will go down as a discrace to their country, their families and untimately a discrace to themselves.

Their mouths are wrapped firmly around this administrations agenda and they will end their careers choking on that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top