MomentsofSanity
Lifer
- Jan 25, 2011
- 17,184
- 9,715
- 146
This rant seems to have almost no bearing as to what’s been said in this thread.
Since the woman passed a lie detector test, Kavanaugh could clear this up easily by taking a lie detector test as well.
This will never happen though.
I never said it was trash. I did say it was suspect and mishandled, and I don’t think that’ changed.
It was previously reported that the FBI received the letter, presumably looked into it and chose not to look into it further.
I also thought Al Franken’s resignation was handled poorly.
Ok, just had to say this:Word already emanating from the WH that Trump will go after the accuser personally. Which could backfire tremendously.
Polygraphs have been proven to be bullshit. The inventor of the polygraph himself came out and said that.This woman appears to have a smart lawyer. Preemptively taking the polygraph cuts off a significant, and usually disingenuous, line of attack against her credibility.
Polygraphs have been proven to be bullshit. The inventor of the polygraph himself came out and said that.
Either way this is just hilariously childish.
Polygraphs have been proven to be bullshit. The inventor of the polygraph himself came out and said that.
Either way this is just hilariously childish.
If this is considered credible... then what ISNT considered credible?This is many things but it’s not childish. It’s a credible accusation of attempted rape.
What has come of it?You repeatedly denigrated it as being something from high school, something anonymous, etc. I kept saying we should wait and see what comes of it but you kept downplaying it. It looks like I was right.
If this is considered credible... then what ISNT considered credible?
Not really, but that seems to be the new talking pointMore like attempted rape.
Not really, but that seems to be the new talking point
What has come of it?
If this is considered credible... then what ISNT considered credible?
Most R senators seem cautious. They know a damaged limb when they see one and aren't about to crawl out on it without good cause.
CNN got Collins on the record at an airport and I wouldn't have extreme confidence in her going along with trying to jam Kavanaugh through.
They don't need her vote though, do they?
Assuming a few red state dems would have voted for confirmation then no. But that calculus is upended now so they probably do.
Isn't it still 50-50 without Collins?
