Kavanaugh SCOTUS Senate Judicial Hearing

Page 221 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,163
136
I keep seeing little Linsey on the news shows re-ranting about this process and how unfair his drunk rapist buddy is being treated by democrats in congress.
Funny....
I don't remember little Linsey so upset when his republican pals were stealing away Obama's US Supreme Court nominee.
I've heard of selective memory, but selective ranting?
Where was your outrage, little linsey, the last year of Obama's term?
And little Linsey, if your ole drunken rapist buddy can get a free pass for freaking out during his hearing, well maybe we should give Obama equal time?
Let Obama go up there before these same republicans and scream holy hell over what Mitch McConnell and old fart Grassley pulled on HIM, Obama.
In all fairness of becoming outraged.....
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,759
2,086
136
We know that the point is that Judge Kavanaugh is a horrible person and not worthy of being a Supreme Court Justice in the estimation of losers and political progressives because he had the nerve to be nominated by President Trump. That's the end of the story. Everything else is just pure horseshit.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,745
17,400
136
We know that the point is that Judge Kavanaugh is a horrible person and not worthy of being a Supreme Court Justice in the estimation of losers and political progressives because he had the nerve to be nominated by President Trump. That's the end of the story. Everything else is just pure horseshit.

Sure, and the lack of a smear campaign against gorsuch was what?

I'm just curious, when you die, do you want to be remembered as one of trumps many ball ticklers or do you think you'll grow out of your man crush before then?
 
  • Like
Reactions: darkswordsman17
Jul 9, 2009
10,759
2,086
136
Sure, and the lack of a smear campaign against gorsuch was what?

I'm just curious, when you die, do you want to be remembered as one of trumps many ball ticklers or do you think you'll grow out of your man crush before then?
Are you a loser or a political progressive?
I hope i'll be remembered as a President Trump voter.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,041
136
We get it taj, you want a partisan hack that will expand Trump’s pardon power and protect him from subpoenas and indictments. You’re not fooling anyone.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,041
136
Never got to ask you this question taj, how about answering:
Do you think a President is above the Law?
Do you think a President should be subpoenaed to testify?
Do you think a President should be indicted if the crimes warrant it?

If your answer is yes to the first and no to the second and third, then Brett's your boy. If you believe otherwise, then you should be against him.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,415
5,018
136

Denly

Golden Member
May 14, 2011
1,436
229
106
We know that the point is that Judge Kavanaugh is a horrible person and not worthy of being a Supreme Court Justice in the estimation of losers and political progressives because he had the nerve to be nominated by President Trump. That's the end of the story. Everything else is just pure horseshit.

Judge Kavanaugh caught...no "caught" is wrong word, Judge Kavanaugh widely reported lie during the hearing under oath, his bat shit crazy opening speech. Those two alone shouldn't be in Supreme Court. American Bar Association, Yale and a few other also calling for delay, they're horseshit too?
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,918
33,572
136
Are you a loser or a political progressive?
I hope i'll be remembered as a President Trump voter.
You're one of those idiots tricked into thinking Hillary would be more corrupt then Trump. Even during the campaign Trump lied 3x more then Hillary.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,918
33,572
136
Ain't it funny if the FBI were sent out for a followup background check when Ford's story broke we'd be finished. Now Republicans want to hurry the vote when they held up Obama's nominee for almost 1 year.

Ok go ahead make sense of that.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,251
55,803
136
A fool and their money are soon parted. I wonder how big of a cut the lawyers are going to get. $699,000.00

Yes, I’m sure she started a secret campaign in 2012 to smear Kavanaugh in 2018 so she could cash in.

Do you guys hear how insane you sound?
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,759
2,086
136
Never got to ask you this question taj, how about answering:
Do you think a President is above the Law?
Do you think a President should be subpoenaed to testify?
Do you think a President should be indicted if the crimes warrant it?

If your answer is yes to the first and no to the second and third, then Brett's your boy. If you believe otherwise, then you should be against him.

1. No
2.Not usually
3.It's unconstitutional
4. Bullshit, I support the Constitution which is why I support Kavanaugh
 
Jan 25, 2011
17,181
9,710
146
And looks like yet another lie from Kavanaugh. Claimed he didn't know about the Ramirez allegation until the New Yorker story. Texts show otherwise. He was proactively calling people before the story went public trying to get them to refute the allegations. He claimed in hearings it was Ramirez calling other classmates attempting to get them to corroborate the allegation.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/su...vanaugh-anxious-come-forward-evidence-n915566
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,759
2,086
136
Judge Kavanaugh caught...no "caught" is wrong word, Judge Kavanaugh widely reported lie during the hearing under oath, his bat shit crazy opening speech. Those two alone shouldn't be in Supreme Court. American Bar Association, Yale and a few other also calling for delay, they're horseshit too?
It wasn't the ABA, it was only their President who didn't notify members and never requested their support.
https://www.nationalreview.com/news...augh-despite-previous-letter-to-the-contrary/
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,251
55,803
136
And looks like yet another lie from Kavanaugh. Claimed he didn't know about the Ramirez allegation until the New Yorker story. Texts show otherwise. He was proactively calling people before the story went public trying to get them to refute the allegations. He claimed in hearings it was Ramirez calling other classmates attempting to get them to corroborate the allegation.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/su...vanaugh-anxious-come-forward-evidence-n915566

If this turns out to be accurate this is a straight up, unequivocal case of perjury. By Kavanaugh's own standards he should not only not be confirmed, he should be impeached in his current position.

It would be fitting if Trump's insistence on nominating this guy to help cover up his corruption ends up costing him his old DC circuit job too due to Kavanaugh's own corruption being outed.