• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Just had a thought.... Microsoft doesn't have an anti-virus tool...

gopunk

Lifer
Jul 7, 2001
29,239
2
0
i dunno, they have zip, backup, firewall, cd burning... seems like just about everything, with the release of xp. yet no anti-virus... *shrug* wonder why.
 

Zim Hosein

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Super Moderator
Nov 27, 1999
65,399
407
126
Because then they would be "considered" a monopoly :D
 

CSoup

Senior member
Jan 9, 2002
565
0
0
Maybe because those other things are one-hit costs. While antivirus software requires updates of virus defs. They would have to pay Symantec or whoever subscription fee. With the current things they include, they just pay an upfront license probably per copy sold to Roxio and Symantec for their technologies.
 

Mitzi

Diamond Member
Aug 22, 2001
3,775
1
76


<< Maybe because those other things are one-hit costs. While antivirus software requires updates of virus defs. They would have to pay Symantec or whoever subscription fee. With the current things they include, they just pay an upfront license probably per copy sold to Roxio and Symantec for their technologies. >>



Sounds like a likely explaination!
 

gopunk

Lifer
Jul 7, 2001
29,239
2
0


<< Maybe because those other things are one-hit costs. While antivirus software requires updates of virus defs. They would have to pay Symantec or whoever subscription fee. With the current things they include, they just pay an upfront license probably per copy sold to Roxio and Symantec for their technologies. >>



hmm, yea, i think that's a good explanation.
 

Skyclad1uhm1

Lifer
Aug 10, 2001
11,383
87
91
Once, long ago, they had one. And I think it was about as good as their OSes.

If an OS bugs out, but 99% of the people use it, you just tell them to get the next version instead when that's released, and they have no clue about other possibilities. When you bring a sh!tty virusscanner on the market while there are quite a lot of good ones already, it's a bit harder to gain a monopoly position.
 

gopunk

Lifer
Jul 7, 2001
29,239
2
0


<< Once, long ago, they had one. And I think it was about as good as their OSes. >>



no kidding... 3.1? learn something new every day...



<< If an OS bugs out, but 99% of the people use it, you just tell them to get the next version instead when that's released, and they have no clue about other possibilities. When you bring a sh!tty virusscanner on the market while there are quite a lot of good ones already, it's a bit harder to gain a monopoly position. >>



well that's true, but then you have to wonder why they did the firewall, zip, and cd burning...
 

CSoup

Senior member
Jan 9, 2002
565
0
0


<< Once, long ago, they had one. And I think it was about as good as their OSes.

If an OS bugs out, but 99% of the people use it, you just tell them to get the next version instead when that's released, and they have no clue about other possibilities. When you bring a sh!tty virusscanner on the market while there are quite a lot of good ones already, it's a bit harder to gain a monopoly position.
>>



Yeah I guess they learned their lesson and started licensing Symantec (SpeedDisk and Doctor) and Diskeeper stuff to make scandisk and defrag.

The XP and WMP burning capabilities are licensed from Roxio, so they probably work as well as CD Creator, but I wonder how well the firewall works since it was built in-house.