• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Jury duty questions...

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: talyn00
Originally posted by: DVK916
Trial with a jurry of your peers is one of worst things in our law systems. All cases should be decided by a panel of judges who understand the law clearly. Not a group of ordinar citizens. We need to end this jury system now, and change to trial by panel of judges only.

an understanding of the law does not prevent judges from introducing their own preconceptions and bias to a case. you might as well say all cases should be judged by a computer which is programmed with the rules of law.

I am not saying judges won't be bias, but giving so much power to ordinary people, power to decide a mans fate is not something I support.
 
Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: talyn00
Originally posted by: DVK916
Trial with a jurry of your peers is one of worst things in our law systems. All cases should be decided by a panel of judges who understand the law clearly. Not a group of ordinar citizens. We need to end this jury system now, and change to trial by panel of judges only.

an understanding of the law does not prevent judges from introducing their own preconceptions and bias to a case. you might as well say all cases should be judged by a computer which is programmed with the rules of law.

I am not saying judges won't be bias, but giving so much power to ordinary people, power to decide a mans fate is not something I support.

are judges not ordinary people?
 
Originally posted by: SpunkyJones
1. He has to let you go and PAY YOU. Not leave, not vacation. Don't let him screw you, if he does turn him in to the state.

2. Oh, we know who you are. 🙂

Sorry. HE doesn't have to pay.
 
Originally posted by: jadinolf
Originally posted by: SpunkyJones
1. He has to let you go and PAY YOU. Not leave, not vacation. Don't let him screw you, if he does turn him in to the state.

2. Oh, we know who you are. 🙂

Sorry. HE doesn't have to pay.

In Massachusetts HE DOES. But not where the OP is unfortunatley. 🙁
 
Back
Top