Can't say this is too surprising. A corrupt judge is attracted to a corrupt firm like bees to honey. Not sure how this will end, though. Is his hiring part of the quid pro quo between him and Samsung or will Samsung, widely known for their corruption and ethical problems, get rid of him since his job is now done. There is, after all, no honor amongst these types. Either way, there should be an investigation.
link
Locked by Moderators PM and TheStu for excessive trolling by multiple forum members
After fellow moderator TheStu and I consulted, we have decided to lock this thread. First, because we are both personally pretty thoroughly exhausted with the who-copied-who threads. Secondly because I can see several people trolling in this thread - one of whom took the rare step of publicly admiting that he was trolling (Zapp, in the future, please refrain from 'rattling the cages').
While I admit that there is probably a topic worth discussing with regards to the actions of the judge in this matter, we aren't actually discussing that subject at all as far as I can see and so rather than hand out warnings and infractions, I'm just going to lock it.
As always if you have positive/negative feedback for me about my actions, please send me a private message.
Moderator PM
link
As famous judges go, Sir Robin Jacob doesn't quite rank up there with some others we can think of (like that handsome fella on the left). But he is well known in legal circles, thanks largely to an important judgement he made against Apple last year. Sir Robin was among three British judges who forced Apple to apologize for accusing Samsung of stealing tablet designs, and he was especially heavily quoted in the press after he highlighted a "lack of integrity" in the way Apple had presented its case. Fast forward to now, however, and Sir Robin is in the limelight for a very different reason. He's quit the role of impartial arbiter in order to become an "expert" who is "working on behalf of" Samsung in a separate dispute with the ITC. We're certainly not accusing the guy of any wrongdoing, but it's interesting that the system allows people to switch between roles just like that. Lawyers, eh?
Locked by Moderators PM and TheStu for excessive trolling by multiple forum members
After fellow moderator TheStu and I consulted, we have decided to lock this thread. First, because we are both personally pretty thoroughly exhausted with the who-copied-who threads. Secondly because I can see several people trolling in this thread - one of whom took the rare step of publicly admiting that he was trolling (Zapp, in the future, please refrain from 'rattling the cages').
While I admit that there is probably a topic worth discussing with regards to the actions of the judge in this matter, we aren't actually discussing that subject at all as far as I can see and so rather than hand out warnings and infractions, I'm just going to lock it.
As always if you have positive/negative feedback for me about my actions, please send me a private message.
Moderator PM
Last edited by a moderator: