Judge rules private company owners cannot be forced to violate their religious belief

[nehalem256]

Patient education, nutritional instruction, routine screening (whether be PE or labwork) for diabetes are among the preventative measures that are covered (reimbursed) by insurance (albeit too poorly, imho). So yes, you are wrong.

Where have I opposed patient education, pregnancy screening for pregnancy

Contraception would be more akin to a special pill that allowed you to eat 5000 calories a day and not get fat.

So is heart disease, kidney disease, etc. etc., should these types of services be restricted as well?

First of all heart disease is not a lifestyle choice. I have no objection to restricting services for the obese and smokers.

 

[TheVrolok]

Where have I opposed patient education, pregnancy screening for pregnancy

At what point did I state that you did? You were insinuating that health insurance does not cover preventative issues for diabetes. You were wrong because it does. That's it.

Contraception would be more akin to a special pill that allowed you to eat 5000 calories a day and not get fat.

Huh? What the fuck are you talking about?

First of all heart disease is not a lifestyle choice. I have no objection to restricting services for the obese and smokers.

Lifestyle choices absolutely lead to heart disease, it is the end result of a lifestyle choice, as already mentioned.