- Oct 12, 2009
- 43,973
- 6,338
- 136
Looked like he was going to wet his pants.all i could do was laugh the whole time. what an idiot.
Looked like he was going to wet his pants.all i could do was laugh the whole time. what an idiot.
![]()
He will soon know where the penis goes.
and he obviously knew he was in the wrong.. he tried to "hide" what he was doing..
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/07/01/article-2010172-0CD0D58100000578-186_468x327.jpg
all i could do was laugh the whole time. what an idiot.
He said he thought she wasn't getting a fair shake.Why would he flip off the prosecuting attorney? The bitch is obviously guilty.
Also, why did he admit to doing it? He could have just said it was a coincidence that his middle finger was up when he was scratching his chin or something. It's not like they could have proven intent.
oops... my bad.6 months for that? Ridiculous.
6 days dumb ass.
The whole nice slow speaking was to essentially get the guy to admit that he was in the wrong and that he knew he was in the wrong.
I thought he did the right thing.
He said he thought she wasn't getting a fair shake.
There's your answer.What was he even doing there? He was a flunky working at TGI fridays with nothing to his name. Aren't there bigger things in his life to worry about than whether he thinks a murderer is getting a fair shake.
He said he thought she wasn't getting a fair shake.
Yep. 6 months for telling the judge to tell the cop to smoke his pole.6 days dumb ass.
The whole nice slow speaking was to essentially get the guy to admit that he was in the wrong and that he knew he was in the wrong.
I thought he did the right thing.
Why would he flip off the prosecuting attorney? The bitch is obviously guilty.
Also, why did he admit to doing it? He could have just said it was a coincidence that his middle finger was up when he was scratching his chin or something. It's not like they could have proven intent.
Wonder why the Anthony guy asked to appeal?
News this a.m. said the last thing the defense did was ask how the family disposed of dead pets. "Black plastic bag and a shovel." Maybe that's the idea.then blame the idiot defense attorney.
the guy is barely a lawyer... and he's taking a shotgun approach.
throw shit out there and see if it sticks.
if she gets off on appeal, it would be for "ineffective assistance of counsel"
News this a.m. said the last thing the defense did was ask how the family disposed of dead pets. "Black plastic bag and a shovel." Maybe that's the idea.
Exactly.yea, but the mom said they used packing tape and buried the bodies.
completely opposite of the way the body was disposed of in the case, and in my opinion (i'm not a lawyer.. so this means nothing)... irrelevant, and only tries to inflame the jury.
i mean.. how many pets has this family "killed off" that burying pets are a ritual that is relevant?
Anyone with kids has done exactly what the judge did.I thought it was awesome. Just watching the way he did it, he was trying to hide it like some asshole juvenile. No way to lie his way out of it.
Speaking as a longtime prosecutor and defense attorney, this is a cardinal sin. I have always believed Scott Peterson was convicted largely because his attorney promised the jury he would be able to prove who actually killed Laci Peterson, then completely failed to deliver any such evidence. (I believe Scott Peterson is very likely guilty but I have never felt the evidence was sufficient to find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.)
.
You want to think accident.John, I'm guessing accidental but she wasn't very broken up about it. Selfish, self centered, spoiled, me, mine and now brat.
