• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

JRUN LET US LIVE!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Kenazo
I know that the ppl behind FuseTalk are also Anandtech employees, but seriously, this is getting crazy. Oh well, it's free. 🙂
Click to expand...

Blame Macromedia for screwing up ColdFusion.
Click to expand...

Then come up with better forum software that doesn't use it. 🙂

Whatever the case, I love AT when it's working. It's just too bad it's out of commission such a high percentage of the time. If I was a paying customer of Fusetalk I would be pretty ripped, even if it was ColdFusion's fault not Fusetalks.
 
Originally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Kenazo
I know that the ppl behind FuseTalk are also Anandtech employees, but seriously, this is getting crazy. Oh well, it's free. 🙂
Click to expand...

Blame Macromedia for screwing up ColdFusion.
Click to expand...

exactly. It's a macromedia issue.

To all thinking about entering the web-programming industry, stay away from Cold Fusion. It's worthless.
Click to expand...

<-- ColdFusion programmer

It's a cool language 🙂. But yes, the server is a nightmare to administer, it doesn't scale well (see Anandtech Forums) and it's expensive.
 
This is #&amp;$^&amp;@# majorly pissing me off. I've barely been on ATOT for two weeks and when I return in full force either the forum has been down or I keep getting &amp;*$^%@ JRUN errors.
 
Originally posted by: Kenazo
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Kenazo
I know that the ppl behind FuseTalk are also Anandtech employees, but seriously, this is getting crazy. Oh well, it's free. 🙂
Click to expand...

Blame Macromedia for screwing up ColdFusion.
Click to expand...

Then come up with better forum software that doesn't use it. 🙂

Whatever the case, I love AT when it's working. It's just too bad it's out of commission such a high percentage of the time. If I was a paying customer of Fusetalk I would be pretty ripped, even if it was ColdFusion's fault not Fusetalks.
Click to expand...

They are moving to .NET (AT).
 
I wonder if Anand had to pay for this upgrade. If he did he should ask for his money back. The last version was so much better...at least for the users
 
It's funny, but while I've had 3 JRun errors today, the forums are actually running better today than they ever have for me. Sweet!!

JRun, you're A-OK! :thumbsup:
 
Originally posted by: SSP
Originally posted by: Kenazo
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Kenazo
I know that the ppl behind FuseTalk are also Anandtech employees, but seriously, this is getting crazy. Oh well, it's free. 🙂
Click to expand...

Blame Macromedia for screwing up ColdFusion.
Click to expand...

Then come up with better forum software that doesn't use it. 🙂

Whatever the case, I love AT when it's working. It's just too bad it's out of commission such a high percentage of the time. If I was a paying customer of Fusetalk I would be pretty ripped, even if it was ColdFusion's fault not Fusetalks.
Click to expand...

They are moving to .NET (AT).
Click to expand...

Good. Hopefully that resolves the majority of the issues. this is how it looked for me at one point this afternoon!
 
Originally posted by: Kenazo
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Kenazo
I know that the ppl behind FuseTalk are also Anandtech employees, but seriously, this is getting crazy. Oh well, it's free. 🙂
Click to expand...

Blame Macromedia for screwing up ColdFusion.
Click to expand...

Then come up with better forum software that doesn't use it. 🙂

Whatever the case, I love AT when it's working. It's just too bad it's out of commission such a high percentage of the time. If I was a paying customer of Fusetalk I would be pretty ripped, even if it was ColdFusion's fault not Fusetalks.
Click to expand...

The previous version didn't have these problems
 
Originally posted by: Kenazo
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Kenazo
I know that the ppl behind FuseTalk are also Anandtech employees, but seriously, this is getting crazy. Oh well, it's free. 🙂
Click to expand...

Blame Macromedia for screwing up ColdFusion.
Click to expand...

Then come up with better forum software that doesn't use it. 🙂

Whatever the case, I love AT when it's working. It's just too bad it's out of commission such a high percentage of the time. If I was a paying customer of Fusetalk I would be pretty ripped, even if it was ColdFusion's fault not Fusetalks.
Click to expand...
Supposedly the .NET verion of Fusetalk should be available REAL SOON NOW? which should fix the JRUN problems (who knows what other problems may occur though?).

Of course the majority of the blame lies with Macromedia, but how can Fusetalk develop and sell software that is based on Macromedia's technology without testing it enough to tell that errors like this occurs constantly?
 
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Kenazo
I know that the ppl behind FuseTalk are also Anandtech employees, but seriously, this is getting crazy. Oh well, it's free. 🙂
Click to expand...

Blame Macromedia for screwing up ColdFusion.
Click to expand...

exactly. It's a macromedia issue.

To all thinking about entering the web-programming industry, stay away from Cold Fusion. It's worthless.
Click to expand...

<-- ColdFusion programmer

It's a cool language 🙂. But yes, the server is a nightmare to administer, it doesn't scale well (see Anandtech Forums) and it's expensive.
Click to expand...

It's a cool concept (tag-based markup, though should be held to XML standards, IMO), but it needs some serious reworking. The server is crap, and becomes more crappy with every "update" macromedia releases.
 
Originally posted by: werk
Originally posted by: Kenazo
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Kenazo
I know that the ppl behind FuseTalk are also Anandtech employees, but seriously, this is getting crazy. Oh well, it's free. 🙂
Click to expand...

Blame Macromedia for screwing up ColdFusion.
Click to expand...

Then come up with better forum software that doesn't use it. 🙂

Whatever the case, I love AT when it's working. It's just too bad it's out of commission such a high percentage of the time. If I was a paying customer of Fusetalk I would be pretty ripped, even if it was ColdFusion's fault not Fusetalks.
Click to expand...
Supposedly the .NET verion of Fusetalk should be available REAL SOON NOW? which should fix the JRUN problems (who knows what other problems may occur though?).

Of course the majority of the blame lies with Macromedia, but how can Fusetalk develop and sell software that is based on Macromedia's technology without testing it enough to tell that errors like this occurs constantly?
Click to expand...

Again, it's not a fuse talk issue. this issue developed majorly when macromedia released one of it's latest patches to CF MX server. Their code is fine, but the server sucks.
 
Why are they applying MX patches in the first place? If there's one thing I've learned from working with CF, it's that once you've found a patch combination that works, STICK TO IT and don't touch it.
 
Originally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: werk
Originally posted by: Kenazo
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Kenazo
I know that the ppl behind FuseTalk are also Anandtech employees, but seriously, this is getting crazy. Oh well, it's free. 🙂
Click to expand...

Blame Macromedia for screwing up ColdFusion.
Click to expand...

Then come up with better forum software that doesn't use it. 🙂

Whatever the case, I love AT when it's working. It's just too bad it's out of commission such a high percentage of the time. If I was a paying customer of Fusetalk I would be pretty ripped, even if it was ColdFusion's fault not Fusetalks.
Click to expand...
Supposedly the .NET verion of Fusetalk should be available REAL SOON NOW? which should fix the JRUN problems (who knows what other problems may occur though?).

Of course the majority of the blame lies with Macromedia, but how can Fusetalk develop and sell software that is based on Macromedia's technology without testing it enough to tell that errors like this occurs constantly?
Click to expand...

Again, it's not a fuse talk issue. this issue developed majorly when macromedia released one of it's latest patches to CF MX server. Their code is fine, but the server sucks.
Click to expand...

That shouldn't matter. You don't build a sweet car using a crap engine and then say that no one should blame us for it. You take the sweet car and put a proper engine in it, then sell it. The end user couldn't give a sh!t why it doesn't work.

That being said, I love the look of fusetalk, and i think it is a very nice design, and I like Anandtech. It's just too bad it's giving so many headaches. And, if it gives me this many problems, I can only imagine how much of a headache it's being to those behind the scenes. Keep up the work guys, I'm looking forward to this .NET rewrite.
 
Originally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: werk
Originally posted by: Kenazo
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Kenazo
I know that the ppl behind FuseTalk are also Anandtech employees, but seriously, this is getting crazy. Oh well, it's free. 🙂
Click to expand...

Blame Macromedia for screwing up ColdFusion.
Click to expand...

Then come up with better forum software that doesn't use it. 🙂

Whatever the case, I love AT when it's working. It's just too bad it's out of commission such a high percentage of the time. If I was a paying customer of Fusetalk I would be pretty ripped, even if it was ColdFusion's fault not Fusetalks.
Click to expand...
Supposedly the .NET verion of Fusetalk should be available REAL SOON NOW? which should fix the JRUN problems (who knows what other problems may occur though?).

Of course the majority of the blame lies with Macromedia, but how can Fusetalk develop and sell software that is based on Macromedia's technology without testing it enough to tell that errors like this occurs constantly?
Click to expand...

Again, it's not a fuse talk issue. this issue developed majorly when macromedia released one of it's latest patches to CF MX server. Their code is fine, but the server sucks.
Click to expand...

Then back out of the patch, so that the site can become usable again. Or ditch this barftastic forum software.
 
Originally posted by: Kenazo
Originally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: werk
Originally posted by: Kenazo
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Kenazo
I know that the ppl behind FuseTalk are also Anandtech employees, but seriously, this is getting crazy. Oh well, it's free. 🙂
Click to expand...

Blame Macromedia for screwing up ColdFusion.
Click to expand...

Then come up with better forum software that doesn't use it. 🙂

Whatever the case, I love AT when it's working. It's just too bad it's out of commission such a high percentage of the time. If I was a paying customer of Fusetalk I would be pretty ripped, even if it was ColdFusion's fault not Fusetalks.
Click to expand...
Supposedly the .NET verion of Fusetalk should be available REAL SOON NOW? which should fix the JRUN problems (who knows what other problems may occur though?).

Of course the majority of the blame lies with Macromedia, but how can Fusetalk develop and sell software that is based on Macromedia's technology without testing it enough to tell that errors like this occurs constantly?
Click to expand...

Again, it's not a fuse talk issue. this issue developed majorly when macromedia released one of it's latest patches to CF MX server. Their code is fine, but the server sucks.
Click to expand...

That shouldn't matter. You don't build a sweet car using a crap engine and then say that no one should blame us for it. You take the sweet car and put a proper engine in it, then sell it. The end user couldn't give a sh!t why it doesn't work.
Click to expand...

When they built it, they built it on a good version of CF. I'm sure they wouldn't have released it otherwise. IIRC, the patch they installed was manditory because of some severe security flaws, so installing it wasn't a question.

Edit, patch was applied for combatibility probs. CFMX requires CFMX server 6.1 or greater.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top