Joe Biden is pissing me off thread

[brycejones]

We

You have to be freebasing Q, blowing Tucker and Sean to find any satirical truth to that toon. Are you really that stupid?

Haven’t we had the answer to your question for years already?

 

[Fenixgoon]

Dude you have some victim culture mentality issues if you see anything racist in that cartoon. Seek some help man.

It's not an outrageous stretch. Why is Obama in the cartoon? He is no longer in office and has by and large stayed out of the spotlight

 

[cytg111]

We
Haven’t we had the answer to your question for years already?

Im the worst kind... an optimist.

 

[dank69]

...

The only way I can make sense of that cartoon is if it's expressing some sort of mad race-based paranoia, because the only thing those two have in common (that they don't have with Biden) is not being white.

...

Why do you think it appeals to people like pcgeek?

 

[Meghan54]

Issues I have with new president Joe Biden.

He killed the pipeline. As a believer in the environment and protecting the environment, shutting down the pipeline was a bad idea. We have oil that must be delivered to the gulf, then shipped away. The pipeline would do that with minimal environmental impact. However now, that oil will still make way to the gulf but rather than thru a pipeline that same oil will rely on giant oil tankers traveling from north to south to deliver that messy oil. And the chances of leakage, sinking, and spilling oil into the ocean will greatly increase. Bad Joe... bad.

First, why should the U.S. have to transport Canadian oil products across its lands? Hmmmm? Can't take the chance building a pipeline across Canada would end up contaminating your lands instead?

And the notion that ships being involved makes the pipeline imperative for safety is just stupid per the rest of your argument....that the oil products that MUST be transported across the U.S. end up where?.....the Gulf, where.....guess what.....the products are loaded on ships...moron. So your arguments are rather ignorant and poorly thought out.

And then we have illegal immigration. Despite your political affiliations, Americans prefer that illegal immigration to be controlled to some point. Having immigrants wait in Mexico while applying for asylum was the correct thing to do. Allowing immigrants into America while applying for asylum and while waiting for an answer was the wrong thing to do. Come-on Joe, you should know better.

Why was it the wrong thing to do?

Is it because you think the asylum seekers won't turn up for their court date? Guess again:

Trump says most asylum seekers don’t show up for their court hearings. A new study says 99% do.

This study contradicts Trump’s rationale for expanding immigration detention.

www.vox.com

War..... One thing I did like about Donald Trump, about the only thing I liked, was that Donald Trump was not a Warhawk. Several times the military forces tried to drag Trump into military operations abroad and time after time Donald Trump resisted. But now??? Here we are barely weeks into a Biden administration and America is at it again, getting involved in the middle east with military operations. I don’t care if you liked Trump or hated Trump during the past four years, however one thing that I know for sure, Americans enjoyed NOT hearing about the Middle East or of military involvement and especially new military engagements. Seriously Joe, you want to go there AGAIN? To begin those years of troops and bombs and engagement all over again? WTF is wrong with you? Seriously. Americans learned their lesson the hard way, why haven’t you?

Hey, alarmist dumbass....Trump had drone strikes, too, so what's your point? Seems Trump was just as warhawk-y as Biden is currently.

Don’t get me wrong, I am glad that Joe Biden was elected. I am rejoicing that Donald Trump is no longer president. But so far Joe Biden is doing exactly what I feared he might do. And I definitely believe Joe Biden is listening to the wrong people. War is never popular. America policing the world was never popular. When huge messy leaky oil tankers can be limited or reduced by one single pipeline, that is a good thing for the environment. It is easier to fix an oil leak on a pipe above ground than to stop tons of oil leaking out of some sunken tanker miles below the oceans surface.

Again, where the fuck do you think that oil will end up? HINT: IN A FUCKING TANKER!!! (Either by distillates or crude....)

The rest of that shit you posted, here and in other spots, is just hysteria on your part, all the while trying to justify conservative policies that most in the U.S. found disagreeable.

 

[ch33zw1z]

It's not an outrageous stretch. Why is Obama in the cartoon? He is no longer in office and has by and large stayed out of the spotlight

That's just someone projecting again.

 

[s0me0nesmind1]

It's not an outrageous stretch. Why is Obama in the cartoon? He is no longer in office and has by and large stayed out of the spotlight

Because as his VP he undoubtedly has an effect on Biden?

You can also find various articles at different various points in time where he is actively still involved in the administration and their strategy.


Again, you're just playing 4D chess to try and declare anything that has a slightly-darker tone skin character in it to have racist intentions when it's anything but. When all you're trained to do is see racism all-day, every day, you're going to continue to self-delusion yourself into seeing it even when it just clearly isn't there.

 

[ch33zw1z]

As noted, any number of spotlight Dems could've been used. The rights racism towards obama is well known.

 

[fskimospy]

Just saying.... Don't want Joe to screw it up. The election of Trump proved one thing if it proved anything at all. That Americans want border control and Americans wanted that pipeline and Americans DO NOT want our military meddling around in the middle east. Americans have had enough of that crap. Those people over there have been at it for 1000 years and they will still be fighting one another 1000 years from now. And correct me, but I believed that pipeline was created to carry oil from Canada down to the Gulf, then away to other lands. If that oil does not travel thru pipelines it will definitely travel via oil tankers. Oil tankers sailing up and down the American coastlines. Personally, I would prefer the pipeline.

An election is coming up in two years believe it or not, and the above is what Donald Trump won on, and the above will be on the front burner once again come 2022. And republican could win back the house and senate come 2022. And if that happens, guess who will be running under their banner for president come 2024?

Biden should ignore the middle east other than asserting diplomacy and not dropping bombs or troops. And if that oil is going to flow, better thru a pipe than stacked on a barge. And seriously, there is a right way and a wrong way to do legal immigration. Most of what the voters believe about pipelines and employment and illegal immigration challenge the facts, but people will still believe what they want to believe or are convinced to believe. Pipelines will be an issue and immigration will be an issue come 2022. It would be wise for Joe to play it safe because hard as that might be, we have a lot more to risk other than pipes and illegals.

Americans do not give a single solitary shit about oil pipelines or if we bomb a camp in Iraq. Like literally zero shits.

 

[brycejones]

As noted, any number of spotlight Dems could've been used. The rights racism towards obama is well known.

And Harris. Keep in mind the “point” made more than once here that Harris isn’t really Black or African American.

 

[kage69]

Cancelling that was definitely the right thing to do. One big corporate fuck job on America and it's tax payers, all to make Canada and China happy? Screw off. A pipeline for private interests that would jeopardize the water supply with maybe the worst form of oil, all for a minimal amount of short lived jobs when we desperately need to cut our ties to fossil fuels? I feel like some people really haven't thought their pipeline support through. Thank goodness Joe has.

So nice to have a real president again. I can crab at him about some things, but saying no to this horrible idea is definitely not one of them.

 

[s0me0nesmind1]

Cancelling that was definitely the right thing to do. One big corporate fuck job on America and it's tax payers, all to make Canada and China happy? Screw off. A pipeline for private interests that would jeopardize the water supply with maybe the worst form of oil, all for a minimal amount of short lived jobs when we desperately need to cut our ties to fossil fuels? I feel like some people really haven't thought their pipeline support through. Thank goodness Joe has.

So nice to have a real president again. I can crab at him about some things, but saying no to this horrible idea is definitely not one of them.

jeopardize the water supply?

OP is obviously crazy and needs to take some anxiety meds - but he is absolutely correct that Pipelines are the safest mode of transportation for oil/gas. Thats not a question, thats not debatable. There are FAR more accidents, spills, and explosions with vessels, barges, trucks, and rail-cars. It's literally underground where humans have the least amount of effect.

Use your brain instead of being fearmongered by incompetent fools that know jack-shit about the industry.


Also - here is a map of all of the pipelines currently in the US. Probably one has been under your house for your entire life and for some reason you didn't seem to notice or care.

 

[Zorba]

And he is just getting started....



View attachment 40285

I know you don't understand since your party commands complete loyalty. But democrats are free to have opinions that don't align with their leaders 100% of the time.

I think Obama was a great president, but it wouldn't take much effort to write down a 10 item list of things I didn't love.

 

[kage69]

jeopardize the water supply?

OP is obviously crazy and needs to take some anxiety meds - but he is absolutely correct that Pipelines are the safest mode of transportation for oil/gas. Thats not a question, thats not debatable. There are FAR more accidents, spills, and explosions with vessels, barges, trucks, and rail-cars. It's literally underground where humans have the least amount of effect.

Use your brain instead of being fearmongered by incompetent fools that know jack-shit about the industry.


Also - here is a map of all of the pipelines currently in the US. Probably one has been under your house for your entire life and for some reason you didn't seem to notice or care.
View attachment 40298

It's just adorable that you think you have any credibility here, really. I'm not going to indulge your cherrypicking because you're a moron who is wrong about nearly everything.

Whats wrong n0b0dy, run out of female Democrats to harass and flame over more delusional bullshit?

I work in the industry and understand what a mistake that pipeline is, take your pissant assumptions and pound'em.

 

[s0me0nesmind1]

It's just adorable that you think you have any credibility here, really. I'm not going to indulge your cherrypicking because you're a moron who is wrong about nearly everything.

Whats wrong n0b0dy, run out of female Democrats to harass and flame over more delusional bullshit?

I work in the industry and understand what a mistake that pipeline is, take your pissant feels and pound'em.

lol no you don't work in the industry - because if you did you wouldn't make such stupid statements regarding pipelines and perhaps might have half a clue of what you're talking about - hence why you did nothing to refute all the points I made.

Continuing looking stupid though if it pleases you.

 

[Zorba]

jeopardize the water supply?

OP is obviously crazy and needs to take some anxiety meds - but he is absolutely correct that Pipelines are the safest mode of transportation for oil/gas. Thats not a question, thats not debatable. There are FAR more accidents, spills, and explosions with vessels, barges, trucks, and rail-cars. It's literally underground where humans have the least amount of effect.

Use your brain instead of being fearmongered by incompetent fools that know jack-shit about the industry.


Also - here is a map of all of the pipelines currently in the US. Probably one has been under your house for your entire life and for some reason you didn't seem to notice or care.
View attachment 40298

What kind of shithole do you live in that allows houses to be built on top of pipelines?

 

[kage69]

lol no you don't work in the industry, and you have zero clue what you're talking about - hence why you did nothing to refute all the points I made.

Continuing looking stupid though if it pleases you.

Dipshit avoids very first point made, then cries that his cherries and straw aren't being respected. How predictable.

I will put my credibility here up against yours any day of the week traitor, but I have no interest in trying to gain the approval of someone as warped as you. 'If I'm to be offended, I must first value your opinion' and all that.

 

[pauldun170]

Issues I have with new president Joe Biden.

...

War..... One thing I did like about Donald Trump, about the only thing I liked, was that Donald Trump was not a Warhawk. Several times the military forces tried to drag Trump into military operations abroad and time after time Donald Trump resisted. But now??? Here we are barely weeks into a Biden administration and America is at it again, getting involved in the middle east with military operations. I don’t care if you liked Trump or hated Trump during the past four years, however one thing that I know for sure, Americans enjoyed NOT hearing about the Middle East or of military involvement and especially new military engagements. Seriously Joe, you want to go there AGAIN? To begin those years of troops and bombs and engagement all over again? WTF is wrong with you? Seriously. Americans learned their lesson the hard way, why haven’t you?

This bit annoyed me

Um...US launched several military operations in Syria under the Trump regime and has had direct involvement in several conflicts in the region. We have been fueling the conflict in Yemen and in Trump's final year were setting the stage to arm proxies to destabilize several countries.
For fucks sake I randomly poked my Microwave and this fell out
https://media.defense.gov/2020/May/06/2002295555/-1/-1/1/SEC-1057-CIVILIAN-CASUALTIES-MAY-1-2020.PDF
Imagine what you'd find if you spent time looking for all the War shit we've been doing.

The reason YOU haven't heard anything about any of this is because Trump and FoxNews have filled the airwaves with all the stupid shit Trump says and all the sort of crap that get idiots worked up about and the rest oif US news media has to get sucked in to counter.

Trump approved the assassination of foreign leaders and launched PR campaign driven airstrikes. His administration encouraged Saudi Arabia involvement in the Yemeni civil war and the United States was an active participant in that conflict.
Trump lost the backing of our traditional allies and Pompeo was setting up a strings attached approach with several countries to enable a more flexible approach of "coalition building" to fuck with Iran. The long game of the Trump administration was arming Iran adversaries and sparking a conflict.
You call Trump a dove when Pompeo, His Son and Law and countless other douchebags have been securing quid pro quo weapons deals and "agreements" that Israel's neighbors will chillout in the event that a joint Israeli\Saudi\US airstrike where all parties magically have top of the line brand spanking new stealth fighters and other advanced aircraft and weaponry happen to launch airstrikes in Iran and escalate it to a new Iraq situation.

Fuck all the Trump was a dove shit.
When Pompeo is on your squad, even the fucking Pope start considering some splodey murder rockets

 

[s0me0nesmind1]

Dipshit avoids very first point made, then cries that his cherries aren't being respected. How predictable.

I will put my credibility here up against yours any day of the week traitor, but I have no interest in trying to gain the approval of someone as warped as you. 'If I'm to be offended, I must first value your opinion' and all that.

Cool story, bro - so you have nothing as predicted.

What "first point" did you make? That you proclaim to work in the industry? You think thats a point?

 

[NWRMidnight]

jeopardize the water supply?

OP is obviously crazy and needs to take some anxiety meds - but he is absolutely correct that Pipelines are the safest mode of transportation for oil/gas. Thats not a question, thats not debatable. There are FAR more accidents, spills, and explosions with vessels, barges, trucks, and rail-cars. It's literally underground where humans have the least amount of effect.

Use your brain instead of being fearmongered by incompetent fools that know jack-shit about the industry.


Also - here is a map of all of the pipelines currently in the US. Probably one has been under your house for your entire life and for some reason you didn't seem to notice or care.
View attachment 40298

You aren't the sharpest tool in a shed full of dull obsolete tools are you? Do you even understand the difference between natural gas pipelines such as the ones you in your pretty little map, vs Oil pipelines? The red hazardous pipelines seems to include oil pipelines, but the blue is natural gas.

No, Oil Pipelines are not the safest transpiration of Oil, Boats are. And that is without taking into account the environmental impact of putting the oil pipelines in.

So which mode is safer? For oil, the short answer is: truck worse than train worse than pipeline worse than boat (Oilprice.com). But that’s only for human death and property destruction. For the amount of oil spilled per billion-ton-miles, it’s truck worse than pipeline worse than rail worse than boat (Congressional Research Service). Even more different is for environmental impact (dominated by impact to aquatic habitat), where it’s boat worse than pipeline worse than truck worse than rail.

Which Is Safer For Transporting Crude Oil: Rail, Truck, Pipeline Or Boat?

News of increased crude oil transportation by rail from Canada has raised this question again. The short answer is: truck worse than train worse than pipeline worse than boat. But it depends on your definition of worse - human deaths, property destruction or environmental impact. You choose.

www.forbes.com

Pipeline spills in US:

Map Displays Five Years of Oil Pipeline Spills | Center for Effective Government

www.foreffectivegov.org

 

[pmv]

There's only so much fossil fuel we can consume without causing disastrous levels of global temperature increase. Given that there's already a strict upper-limit on how much we can burn, I don't see that making it less economical to consume the particularly destructive form of tar-sands oil - by not building the pipeline - as part of that limited quota, is a bad thing.

Also I don't get the OP. They've gone from catastrophising about Trump staging a coup and overthrowing democracy to complaining about Biden (Biden!) being too radical and not being more like Trump. From one extreme to the other.

 

[kage69]

Trump was against war? I guess you can say that if you

You aren't the sharpest tool in a shed full of dull obsolete tools are you? Do you even understand the difference between natural gas pipelines such as the ones you in your pretty little map, vs Oil pipelines? No, Oil Pipelines are not the safest transpiration of Oil, and that is without taking into account the environmental impact of putting the oil pipelines in.

Which Is Safer For Transporting Crude Oil: Rail, Truck, Pipeline Or Boat?

News of increased crude oil transportation by rail from Canada has raised this question again. The short answer is: truck worse than train worse than pipeline worse than boat. But it depends on your definition of worse - human deaths, property destruction or environmental impact. You choose.

www.forbes.com

You'll only confuse him with facts I'm afraid. You'd think he'd be all for making new jobs after what Il Douche did to the economy, rather than helping entrench a destructive energy source that will harm employment here but help China.

Poor repugs. It's not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so.

 

[Pohemi]

Thats not a question, thats not debatable. There are FAR more accidents, spills, and explosions with vessels, barges, trucks, and rail-cars. It's literally underground where humans have the least amount of effect.
Use your brain instead of being fearmongered by incompetent fools that know jack-shit about the industry.

lol no you don't work in the industry - because if you did you wouldn't make such stupid statements regarding pipelines and perhaps might have half a clue of what you're talking about - hence why you did nothing to refute all the points I made.
Continuing looking stupid though if it pleases you.

Cool story, bro - so you have nothing as predicted.
What "first point" did you make?

Oh look, the stupid fucking clown put on his clownshoes again.

Calling others stupid/ignorant/liars for making true statements about pipelines, while claiming they are built underground?

Flailing about people deflecting while addressing and answering nothing.

Stupid fucking clown.

Also I don't get the OP. They've gone from catastrophising about Trump staging a coup and overthrowing democracy to complaining about Biden (Biden!) being too radical and not being more like Trump. From one extreme to the other.

Bit of an alarmist. Just a bit.

 

[Pohemi]

sorry for double post

 

[Indus]

So Sportage thinks pipelines are safer than trucks.. I have a bridge to sell you..









But hey lets blame Biden instead of the pipeline just because..