• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

JFK II A must see Did Bush Sr. off JFK?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: morkinva
I don't see why you need to apologize with statements like it's tinfoil related. I stand proudly in my belief that there was a conspiracy here.

As for the greenbacks, this is a fiat based currency. From what I remember in the documentary The Money Masters, it's not fiat currency that is a problem. It's the fractional reserve system that makes so much money for these folks. The debt-based money system enables them a lot of power with the interest they charge and is the source of inflation (or deflation as they so desire).

I do understand that the Fractional reseve deposit expansion and the Federal Reserve itself are the prime reason behind our money problems. But I also remember that as shown in the Money Masters video that green back system is based on money issued by the government as compared to Federal Reserve System where the government sells bonds to Fed and then gets credited by the Fed from the credits which the Fed just creates.

I remember that the video did not mention anything about the EO 11110 which got me somewhat concerned. So I emailed Pat Carmack, the maker of the video. He simply replied that EO 11110 had nothing to do with curtailing Fed's money monopoly and I believe for this reason, Pat and Bill did not include any reference to this executive order.

Also, Pat mentions that the United States Notes that were issued in 60's were not a new issue, but the same green back re-issued as they had been issued before.

So to recap, the debt-based system as foisted on this nation since 1864, fractional reserve banking system and the complete Federal Reserve System monopoly are the critical reasons behind our flawed money system.



 
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
This private Federal Reserve stuff is good too, *scratches chin and reads more*

You know Steep, I used to wonder this every time I hear that Fed is private and what exactly it means. But one day I got hold of the Money Masters video and then every thing started to make sense. Honestly, I have watched that video 4 times and still can't have enough of it. 😀
 
Originally posted by: Buck Armstrong
Yeah, I'm sure his death, and that of his brother, had absolutely nothing to do with the fact that the mob rigged JFKs election for his criminal daddy, and then whacked him when he turned on them.

If you're into family ties with Nazis and the mafia, as well as forcibly lobotomizing your own kids, go read about the patriarch of the Kennedy family. There are PLENTY of legitimate reasons to criticize the Bushes, but in this case its too much of a reach; JFKs pappy was a bad bad man, and his sons (who probably weren't much better) paid the price.

QFT.

Another liberal conspiracy theory...
 
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: Buck Armstrong
Yeah, I'm sure his death, and that of his brother, had absolutely nothing to do with the fact that the mob rigged JFKs election for his criminal daddy, and then whacked him when he turned on them.

If you're into family ties with Nazis and the mafia, as well as forcibly lobotomizing your own kids, go read about the patriarch of the Kennedy family. There are PLENTY of legitimate reasons to criticize the Bushes, but in this case its too much of a reach; JFKs pappy was a bad bad man, and his sons (who probably weren't much better) paid the price.

QFT.

Another liberal conspiracy theory...

Standard Neocon rubber stamp.

K thx bye
 
I think you should get the NYTimes to publish this. The more of these idiotic stories come out the left, the better off the right looks lmao.

 
I watched that Money Masters and all I have to say is...wow

I never knew that much about the Private Federal Reserve and how dangerous the private aspect of it is. :shocked:

I recommend that to everyone, total fraud that divisional banking is, holy crap no wonder certain families always seem to be behind the scenes.

The Money Masters[/quote] <---scary stuff now I see why people get so pissed about WMF and global money markets/banks

Thanks for the link dababus that makes perfect sense why such evilness seems to follow capitalism around and the ultra-rich elite familys of the world always seem to be one step behind the curtain.

The founding fathers are rolling in their graves..
 
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
I watched that Money Masters and all I have to say is...wow

I never knew that much about the Private Federal Reserve and how dangerous the private aspect of it is. :shocked:

I recommend that to everyone, total fraud that divisional banking is, holy crap no wonder certain families always seem to be behind the scenes.

The Money Masters
<---scary stuff now I see why people get so pissed about WMF and global money markets/banks

Thanks for the link dababus that makes perfect sense why such evilness seems to follow capitalism around and the ultra-rich elite familys of the world always seem to be one step behind the curtain.

The founding fathers are rolling in their graves..
[/quote]

This video is a must see for every thinking and concerned individual in this country and on this globe (if he / she can have an acquire this video).

I believe people like Thomas Jefferson, John Adams must be rolling in their graves because they pointed out the dangers a banking establishment poses towards the republic. But at the same time there were other "fathers" like Hamilton who wanted a privately owned central and used to tout statements like that a national debt will be a national blessing. I believe that while the constitution was being drafted, the money changers were quite active in making sure that checkmate American republic in terms of it monetary powers. Considering the fact that constitution is silent over the issue of paper currency aka bill of credits and gives power to congress to borrow money over the credit of United States, one power which Jefferson thought should be completely stripped off or reduced dramatically, I believe that money changers planted the seeds of tyranny.

 
It was summed up pretty well in the movie with saying something like as long as the printing is owned by the moneychangers it makes no difference who is king or elected.

Thanks for the link good stuff. I sure learned a lot about money that was just nonsense to me before.
 
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
It was summed up pretty well in the movie with saying something like as long as the printing is owned by the moneychangers it makes no difference who is king or elected.

Thanks for the link good stuff. I sure learned a lot about money that was just nonsense to me before.

Imagine if more people will come to find this out. Just like John Adams said that America's trouble begins with people's ignorance regarding coin, credit, and circulation. Again, I highly recommend this video to every one.

Thanks Steep and morkinva for bringing up this crucial issue for discussion. :thumbsup:
 
Great documentary! A must-see. Also watch "The men who killed Kennedy", available on emule. And "The Jim Garrison tapes". And Fletcher Prouty's interviews.
 
even if we don't agree about who may have been behind the killing, can we all agree that there is something very mysterious about what happened and that it seems likely there was a second shooter?
 
I still have no judgement, but that there was something weird going on, with as much evilness running around behind the scenes I think in the end its a "had to be there" kinda thing.

Still, it's fun to get different points of view since it is so wide open.
 
The JFK shooting does beg a number of questions, but what is it with conspiracy theories that complain about weak evidence but use even weaker evidence to discredit their "weak" evidence


ie, because Kennedy's press secretary touched the front of his head when stating that Kennedy was shot in the head means that Kennedy actually was shot there and that means there is a conspiracy... there are several absurd assumptions in that statement and its prevalent throughout this video
 
scary stuff now I see why people get so pissed about WMF and global money markets/banks

Funny. You know so much about banks that you are using two terms totally out of context here. The WMF has nothing to do with US banks or the Fed. Furthermore, I have no idea what this global money market/bank is? A money market is an account you can have - like a high interest savings account. Are you referring to monetary trade? Currency valuation? I am simply lost at the ignorance here.

I am guessing that you have yet to venture into the real world. Seriously, your total lack of understanding of even simple concepts is amazing...
 
This documentary while raising interesting points about that oddly pristine bullet gets goofy towards the end, its like


Prescott Bush knew Nixon, who knew Bob, who knew John, who was a friend of Janes, Jane may have been involved in the JFK assassination, which means John, Bob, Nixon and Fred was too
 
Originally posted by: Frackal
This documentary while raising interesting points about that oddly pristine bullet gets goofy towards the end, its like


Prescott Bush knew Nixon, who knew Bob, who knew John, who was a friend of Janes, Jane may have been involved in the JFK assassination, which means John, Bob, Nixon and Fred was too


ok, and your point? it's called researching your links to conspirators. what player in the conspiracy do you have a problem with them linking?
 
None, its an interesting documentary, and legitimately disturbing, but it goes overboard and damages its credibility.... but, disturbing nonetheless, depending on how accurate it is.
 
Back
Top