Jesus's middle name is Hume! Caution: Some NSFW images within!

Page 1750 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
John Connor

John Connor

Lifer
Nov 30, 2012
22,757
618
121
Okay, that's fucked up! I have him on ignore so I have to find it and report that shit now. That is unacceptable! This is for funny pictures. I got kicked in the ass for posting lesser in here.
 
John Connor

John Connor

Lifer
Nov 30, 2012
22,757
618
121
Doesn't matter? It's not even REMOTELY funny! Why link to it in the first place?

And that cute little retarded puppy you compared me to. I'm honored to be thought of as a cute puppy, but I am far from having the same mental capacity as you.
 
Last edited:
halik

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
manimal said:
o0vd1Jg.gif
Click to expand...

HAHAHA manimal wins this week!
 
Puppies04

Puppies04

Diamond Member
Apr 25, 2011
5,909
17
76
rsbennett00 said:
It doesn't belong in the babe thread because I didn't take the photo.
Click to expand...

Wait..

WAIT....

STOPPPPPP!!!

You think AT members take the pictures posted in the babe thread......













































HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
 
R

rsbennett00

Senior member
Jul 13, 2014
962
0
76
Puppies04 said:
Wait..

WAIT....

STOPPPPPP!!!

You think AT members take the pictures posted in the babe thread......













































HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Click to expand...

I have principles so I don't post such images that I don't have the actual rights to, usually because I took it or I'm in it. I don't steal other peoples content. I realize that most people do and that's on their head.
 
Puppies04

Puppies04

Diamond Member
Apr 25, 2011
5,909
17
76
rsbennett00 said:
I have principles so I don't post such images that I don't have the actual rights to, usually because I took it or I'm in it. I don't steal other peoples content. I realize that most people do and that's on their head.
Click to expand...

If someone posts something on the internet it is in the public domain. As long as you aren't making money from it what is the problem?
 
destrekor

destrekor

Lifer
Nov 18, 2005
28,799
359
126
Puppies04 said:
If someone posts something on the internet it is in the public domain. As long as you aren't making money from it what is the problem?
Click to expand...

Exactly. In these cases, showing other peoples work is simply that, showing other peoples work. It requires no license to display the work of others in a public setting that produces no ill-gotten gains.

Now, if you ran a site like buzzfeed and did not give credit to the photographer of any photos (and license the photo, most likely), then you are in the wrong, because those are entirely for the purpose of generating views and the resulting advertising revenue.

To worry about it here is comical.
 
Ichinisan

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
rsbennett00 said:
I have principles so I don't post such images that I don't have the actual rights to, usually because I took it or I'm in it. I don't steal other peoples content. I realize that most people do and that's on their head.
Click to expand...

Posting the picture in this thread is somehow legally / morally different from posting it in that thread?
 
Puppies04

Puppies04

Diamond Member
Apr 25, 2011
5,909
17
76
destrekor said:
Exactly. In these cases, showing other peoples work is simply that, showing other peoples work. It requires no license to display the work of others in a public setting that produces no ill-gotten gains.

Now, if you ran a site like buzzfeed and did not give credit to the photographer of any photos (and license the photo, most likely), then you are in the wrong, because those are entirely for the purpose of generating views and the resulting advertising revenue.

To worry about it here is comical.
Click to expand...

Thanks I really couldn't be bothered to type all that out.
 
lxskllr

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
59,844
10,336
126
destrekor said:
Exactly. In these cases, showing other peoples work is simply that, showing other peoples work. It requires no license to display the work of others in a public setting that produces no ill-gotten gains.

Now, if you ran a site like buzzfeed and did not give credit to the photographer of any photos (and license the photo, most likely), then you are in the wrong, because those are entirely for the purpose of generating views and the resulting advertising revenue.

To worry about it here is comical.
Click to expand...

That's not really what the law states. I don't think an uncommented reposting of an image qualifies under any kind of fair use standard. I disagree with almost all of copyright law, but misrepresenting it does a disservice to everyone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom