• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Jesus's middle name is Hume! Caution: Some NSFW images within!

Page 1750 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Okay, that's fucked up! I have him on ignore so I have to find it and report that shit now. That is unacceptable! This is for funny pictures. I got kicked in the ass for posting lesser in here.
 
Doesn't matter? It's not even REMOTELY funny! Why link to it in the first place?

And that cute little retarded puppy you compared me to. I'm honored to be thought of as a cute puppy, but I am far from having the same mental capacity as you.
 
Last edited:
manimal said:
o0vd1Jg.gif
Click to expand...

HAHAHA manimal wins this week!
 
rsbennett00 said:
It doesn't belong in the babe thread because I didn't take the photo.
Click to expand...

Wait..

WAIT....

STOPPPPPP!!!

You think AT members take the pictures posted in the babe thread......













































HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
 
Puppies04 said:
Wait..

WAIT....

STOPPPPPP!!!

You think AT members take the pictures posted in the babe thread......













































HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Click to expand...

I have principles so I don't post such images that I don't have the actual rights to, usually because I took it or I'm in it. I don't steal other peoples content. I realize that most people do and that's on their head.
 
rsbennett00 said:
I have principles so I don't post such images that I don't have the actual rights to, usually because I took it or I'm in it. I don't steal other peoples content. I realize that most people do and that's on their head.
Click to expand...

If someone posts something on the internet it is in the public domain. As long as you aren't making money from it what is the problem?
 
Puppies04 said:
If someone posts something on the internet it is in the public domain. As long as you aren't making money from it what is the problem?
Click to expand...

Exactly. In these cases, showing other peoples work is simply that, showing other peoples work. It requires no license to display the work of others in a public setting that produces no ill-gotten gains.

Now, if you ran a site like buzzfeed and did not give credit to the photographer of any photos (and license the photo, most likely), then you are in the wrong, because those are entirely for the purpose of generating views and the resulting advertising revenue.

To worry about it here is comical.
 
rsbennett00 said:
I have principles so I don't post such images that I don't have the actual rights to, usually because I took it or I'm in it. I don't steal other peoples content. I realize that most people do and that's on their head.
Click to expand...

Posting the picture in this thread is somehow legally / morally different from posting it in that thread?
 
destrekor said:
Exactly. In these cases, showing other peoples work is simply that, showing other peoples work. It requires no license to display the work of others in a public setting that produces no ill-gotten gains.

Now, if you ran a site like buzzfeed and did not give credit to the photographer of any photos (and license the photo, most likely), then you are in the wrong, because those are entirely for the purpose of generating views and the resulting advertising revenue.

To worry about it here is comical.
Click to expand...

Thanks I really couldn't be bothered to type all that out.
 
destrekor said:
Exactly. In these cases, showing other peoples work is simply that, showing other peoples work. It requires no license to display the work of others in a public setting that produces no ill-gotten gains.

Now, if you ran a site like buzzfeed and did not give credit to the photographer of any photos (and license the photo, most likely), then you are in the wrong, because those are entirely for the purpose of generating views and the resulting advertising revenue.

To worry about it here is comical.
Click to expand...

That's not really what the law states. I don't think an uncommented reposting of an image qualifies under any kind of fair use standard. I disagree with almost all of copyright law, but misrepresenting it does a disservice to everyone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top