Jesus's middle name is Hume! Caution: Some NSFW images within!

Page 1228 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Newbian

Lifer
Aug 24, 2008
24,779
882
126
:shrug: She's just a cool chick I follow on Twitter.

And whoever said she is almost a porn star is an idiot. I mean...unless you are a furry but then you have a whole different set of things to worry about.

Is stalking a a chick that you say is famous because she does cosplay really that much different then being a furry?

Looking at some of the outfits she wears in google looks like she has already crossed that line.
 
Last edited:

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,351
14
61
Stalking a cosplay chick is about as close to being a furry without dressing up.

Might as well just cross the line and get a costume.

Isn't it the opposite?

Dressing up but no sex?

So its closer to being a clown?

I would do clown sex with her.
 

Newbian

Lifer
Aug 24, 2008
24,779
882
126
Isn't it the opposite?

Dressing up but no sex?

So its closer to being a clown?

I would do clown sex with her.

Be careful man or you might get clown raped:

2dbf3fb51d0d9fd0aa9291bc64633dd112892db2578599229dc7b2880f8e1292.jpg
 

destrekor

Lifer
Nov 18, 2005
28,799
359
126
the great david mitchell would like to have a word with you

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=om7O0MFkmpw

how can people get this wrong?

Who got it wrong?
Am I missing something?
:colbert:


Considering I explicitly said I used it right, that should clue you in that it's both a little tongue-in-cheek and acknowledging that, wow, I actually could care less.

Now please refer to my replies after that (on this page, I think) to see how I'm not going to clarify how much I actually care.

Also the last half of that original post should have made it clear that I care enough to get in them pants, if it ever mattered, but alas, I doubt I'd ever meet her.


Yeesh - don't be so dense. I'm not so foolish as to proclaim I'm absolutely correct if there was a hint of uncertainty with my grasp on the phrase. ;)