BladeVenom
Lifer
- Jun 2, 2005
- 13,365
- 16
- 0
![]()
1991 EOS Trans. AGU Vol 72, No 27-53, p456
The American Geophysical Union reviewers were a bit remiss.
It's a meeting abstract for a poster session. There would be no corresponding paper. I was at the meeting in 1992 but missed 1991. I am interested to see what they put up for the poster.lmao
I guess it's real too! Though I'm prepared for that to be an extravagant lie.
It's an abstract. The whole journal submission thing might actually leave room for shoddy abstracts to make it past the editor(s). Brilliant if true.
wonder if there was an attached and factual review and this was a joke abstract for a real article, or if there was never anything other than the abstract.
If anyone has access to e-journals, see if you can track that one down.![]()
It's a meeting abstract for a poster session. There would be no corresponding paper. I was at the meeting in 1992 but missed 1991. I am interested to see what they put up for the poster.
One thing about the AGU meetings is that they are huge with 22,000 participants expected this year (next week in SF) and poster sessions allow more folks to present than is possible to accommodate in oral sessions.ahhh
Well then. Shows me for ignoring "poster" at the top and, in general, having no idea about the concept of organizational meetings with compiled abstracts and posters and whatnot.
I never ventured outside of the standard journals in my research during and following college. Haven't come across these before. :\
My wife is a feminist now; so I'm required to think that knitting with yarn wet from your mensies is legit art.
How does I fix wife?
bwahahaa
How can anyone not know who Jessica Nigri is?
A legend in her own mind, never heard of, didn't google her name, but "cosplay boobs" is likely later on.
did you know that she makes all of those costumes herself, by hand?
She is a kickass chick!
Perfect body has fake tits?heads up
that's a wonderful search string. have to sort through some duds, but plenty of epicness to go around.
Could care less (I did use that correctly) who she is, as I generally find cosplay an annoying thing.
But holy hell, she has a bangin' body. Like, what might be the perfect body.
are you on Twitter at all?
She posts awesome pics of her making costumes, at comic cons, with video game people, she blasts people who go too far...she's just awesome.
And yes...I want to marry her and do bad things to her.
lmao
I guess it's real too! Though I'm prepared for that to be an extravagant lie.
It's an abstract. The whole journal submission thing might actually leave room for shoddy abstracts to make it past the editor(s). Brilliant if true.
wonder if there was an attached and factual review and this was a joke abstract for a real article, or if there was never anything other than the abstract.
If anyone has access to e-journals, see if you can track that one down.![]()
lmao
I guess it's real too! Though I'm prepared for that to be an extravagant lie.
It's an abstract. The whole journal submission thing might actually leave room for shoddy abstracts to make it past the editor(s). Brilliant if true.
wonder if there was an attached and factual review and this was a joke abstract for a real article, or if there was never anything other than the abstract.
If anyone has access to e-journals, see if you can track that one down.![]()
Perfect body has fake tits?
Could care less (I did use that correctly )
aw shucks.
no, no it certainly does not.
You had to ruin her for me, huh? You just had to? Man... ignorance is bliss.
There's a thread on bodybuilding.com that shows early pics of her, pretty flat.
But she was skinnier. Late bloomer? There are also not quite as early pics that look like healthy breasts, a little smaller. Either she got smaller implants the first time around and upgraded, she got one set of implants and has been using much better breast-enhancement techniques like push-up bras, or as she filled out (looks much healthier, far more attractive, all-around, then skinny pics of her earlier) breasts got the fat first? She did fill out all around, like boom, perfect feminine figure after a skinny straight-hipped look.
Hell, here's the thread: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=154087761
first post has much win, fake or not. :awe:
a quick google of her name also shows a widely varied size to suggest at least gradual change over the years (I never compared any dates, only boobs) or improving use of bra/boosting tricks and visual tricks (high compression-type shirt, colors/contrast, lines, etc).
Could be simply implants... I'll never meet her, so don't much matter anyway. Still eye candy![]()
Could care less (I did use that correctly) who she is, as I generally find cosplay an annoying thing.
It's a meeting abstract for a poster session. There would be no corresponding paper. I was at the meeting in 1992 but missed 1991. I am interested to see what they put up for the poster.
Reminds me of this paper
http://www.piengineering.com/jacks/FDCWill-Pawprint_800.jpg
co-authored by the noted scientist FDC Willard
http://www.piengineering.com/jacks/FDCWillard.php
I remember hearing about that and looking the paper up in the relevant journal back when a student a very long time ago.