Jesus's middle name is Hume! Caution: Some NSFW images within!

Page 911 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

eits

Lifer
Jun 4, 2005
25,015
3
81
www.integratedssr.com
Tak9Ssp.gif

reminds me of the tree spirit or whatever in princess mononoke
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
I'm saying that the difference does not mean what you think it means. Shorty brought a bad joke. You didn't. I'm pretty sure you were one of the ones telling me not to respond to the bad Louis CK "joke" that was based on wrong assumptions.

hekidinyoudemotivationalposter-vi.jpg


You must think that your point was inarguable and, thus, you weren't bringing the debate here, but ending it. That is laughable because it shows that you don't even understand the basic argument that the difference is not what distinguishes one from the other. People argue that BOTH are protected human lives and your point does nothing to address that. All it says is that you disagree while adding no additional reason.

You do realize that a newborn is "non-viable" on it's own too, right? Because that's going to be the next point someone you think you have backed into a corner will make. You can even go back and forth over "viable" embryos: The one you show looks perfectly "viable" in the usual sense of the word (could be implanted and taken to full term). If you want to debate that too, take it to P&N.

I'm not making these points. You just don't seem to have a clue what the other side of the argument even is. Of course you think the difference means something when it comes to justifying abortion. The other side doesn't, which is where the argument STARTS. IOW, the understood difference is the STARTING POINT of the argument, so thanks for taking us all the way back with your failed point. :rolleyes:

Great, if i become brain dead, just shove me up a womans vagina and magically i am alive.

You don't get to call that which is not alive yet by the basis of the medical definition of human life, alive without defining it as a living fetus which is kinda like a fucking ant when it comes to basal functions and not alive AT ALL when it comes to the medical definition for a human being.

SO understand the fucking difference between alive and not alive and then take your entire argument and shove it up your arse.

I'm not going to argue viability though because it makes no sense, it's either not alive and then it's not the taking of a life or it's alive and then it is. Fortunately enough my nation like all civilized western nations have set the limit at just that, before week 25.
 

jagec

Lifer
Apr 30, 2004
24,442
6
81
Great, if i become brain dead, just shove me up a womans vagina and magically i am alive.

You don't get to call that which is not alive yet by the basis of the medical definition of human life, alive without defining it as a living fetus which is kinda like a fucking ant when it comes to basal functions and not alive AT ALL when it comes to the medical definition for a human being.

SO understand the fucking difference between alive and not alive and then take your entire argument and shove it up your arse.

I'm not going to argue viability though because it makes no sense, it's either not alive and then it's not the taking of a life or it's alive and then it is. Fortunately enough my nation like all civilized western nations have set the limit at just that, before week 25.


Take it to P&N, guys.