Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Not true, I said "believe what they believe" not "behave..." Who's all about hasty generalizations now?
I could believe what they believe and not set up an 'indoctrination center.' You were citing the belief, not the behavior, but the behavior is what you actually have a problem with. Believe me - their behavior worries me as much as it does you. One lab tech in my department lives in a far-right-wing religious commune where the kids are international judo champions and all own, and often fire, assault rifles (ages 9-17). I have no problem decrying this behavior, but the belief system is not causally related to the behavior, even if it is highly correlated. The indoctrination system itself is the cause.
The guy dislikes me because I'm a Catholic. He dislikes me more because I'm a Catholic who has actually read the Bible. He dislikes me more still because I like to point out his inconstitencies. He really dislikes that I called him on his saying that Jesus said 'an eye for an eye', where Jesus really said exactly the opposite (You've heard it said 'an eye for an eye', but I say to you - if someone hits your cheek, give him your other cheek. paraphrase).
As a Catholic, I am acutely aware of what can happen when a religion gets power-hungry, as my own Church has done in the past. These past abuses are why the Catholic Church expends so much effort now teaching future priests the historical context and even the original languages that the Bible was written in so they can actually understand what was being conveyed by the original author rather than some literal interpretation. The fallacy of a literal interpretation, as Lewis Black likes to say, is that the Jews never took it literally before Jesus' time, and that any literal interpretation would be language-dependent, as idiomatic expressions vary considerably per language and culture.
/ramble