DrPizza
Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Maybe he doesn't really believe that stuff. Don't forget, his first profession was an actor. (hit in the head with chairs - you guys think that stuff is real?)
Maybe he doesn't really believe that stuff. Don't forget, his first profession was an actor. (hit in the head with chairs - you guys think that stuff is real?)
Your distortion of motives and actions is exaggerated, and has negative and paranoid slant. Try thinking positive man; it’ll improve your life.
J. Ventura explained that in a more balanced and rational way, making your contradictory analysis look ridiculous.
The treasury had a cash surplus. There was no way the cash was going sit static for a long time in your so called “rainy day fund.” Politicians were clamoring to spend it in various ways each of them schemed would make themselves look good to their constituents. J. Ventura decided to preempt their out-of-budget spend plans by returning the cash to people it had been unnecessarily taxed away from.
Obviously, it’s a given that there’ll be problems returning cash to taxpayers. Of course! Overall, however, Jesse Ventura’s cash return was admirable, exemplary stewardship of the public trust, and we need to see more of that attitude expressed by others nationwide.
Should this come to pass they'll have my vote with a double middle finger to the corporate bought and paid for politicians that occupy office now.
Please, I was there. I saw the aftermath. The UofMN faced massive increases, mainly because they were promised money which turned out to be what he gave back. He also defunded several infrastructure projects, including bridge inspections and repairs.
When he first became governor in Minnesota I said that if he runs for President, my vote is his to lose. It did not take him long to exercise that option.
Just because they might give the middle finger to conventional politicians doesn't mean that they'll be any better when in office or that they'll enact better economic and social policies. What if their economic policies would make things much, much worse? Suppose that Rand Paul's economic policies resulted in 95% of the American people being working poor with 5% being very rich, living off their backs? (Oh wait, that's the current Republican and Tea Party economic policy.)
Are you implying that Jesse may have been partially responsible for the I-35 bridge collapse that killed several people?
Unfortunately you have already demonstrated in post 4 above that an analysis presented by you is skewed toward the negative, overlaying the worst imaginable perspective onto things, or in other words, you are paranoid. Your presentation of matters is not to be trusted by reasonable, fair minded people.
And now here you are again presenting a retread of essentially the same extremely slanted, unbalanced tale of how things really were the inside story. Sorry, Im sure youre a good guy but we dont buy the negativity you suffer from and spread to everybody.
Go watch a comedy or something, have a laugh; maybe thatll help bump you out of your gloomy unbalanced downer its-all-bad attitude.
In my opinion J. Ventura's motivation was a very positive thing in this rebate matter. I hope his courageous (because outside the box) example is an icebreaker that more politicians follow.
