• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Jeffrey Epstein, millionaire pedophile and human trafficker arrested.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
kage69 said:
I love how Mr. Grab'em By The Pussy with 22 credible sexual assault accusers wasted no time in disavowing the guy.

"We had a falling out."

Yeah, Epstein probably said No when Trump asked if he could bring Ivanka on the orgy boat.
Click to expand...

Honestly, I doubt he would've said no. Only reason I can think is he didn't want others to have her. The falling out is most likely that Turmp preferred paying porn stars because he'd gotten too lazy to do any of the actual work of fucking and he knew they'd know how while some 13 year old might not.

I wish some media person would have an epic "fuck this job" and ask Turmp how many times he's raped his daughter. Then if he said "never", then respond with "oh, so you're saying it was always consensual?" I can almost 100% guarantee he's been very inappropriate with her.
 
JSt0rm said:
choochoo

VbGXmzY.jpg
Click to expand...



Cant tell if that is fake or not ...


edit : Its fake.
 
cytg111 said:
Cant tell if that is fake or not ...


edit : Its fake.
Click to expand...
Sort of fake. The original of Trump is just as creepy looking, although I'll give that he's just trying to look good for the camera and failing rather than letching on his underaged daughter.
 
WelshBloke said:
Sort of fake. The original of Trump is just as creepy looking, although I'll give that he's just trying to look good for the camera and failing rather than letching on his underaged daughter.
Click to expand...

Copy. I was referring to Epstein .. He is an "addition" to that photo.
 
hal2kilo said:
Alan, oh Alan, how you have fallen.
Click to expand...


Fallen? I can't remember a time I didn't detest that guy. An anti-feminist anti-Palestinian pro-torture pro-war rich conservative. I haven't followed his every stance on everything, but I can't remember him ever having a position on anything that wasn't very much on the right.

I used to see him as an example of how weirdly right-wing US 'liberals' are, though it seems as if those liberals no longer regard him as one of their own.
 
Clinton was one of his buds too. Lots of the high and mighty were.

m8d said:
"I've known Jeff (Epstein) for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side." - Donald J. Trump, 2002
Click to expand...
 
Has anyone considered that this government is actually pro child sex trafficking?

Trump labor secretary who cut Epstein deal plans to slash funds for sex trafficking victims

Alexander Acosta, the US labor secretary under fire for having granted Jeffrey Epstein immunity from federal prosecution in 2008, after the billionaire was investigated for having run a child sex trafficking ring, is proposing 80% funding cuts for the government agency that combats child sex trafficking.

Acosta’s plan to slash funding of a critical federal agency in the fight against the sexual exploitation of children is contained in his financial plans for the Department of Labor for fiscal year 2020. In it, he proposes decimating the resources of a section of his own department known as the International Labor Affairs Bureau (ILAB).

The bureau’s budget would fall from $68m last year to just $18.5m. The proposed reduction is so drastic that experts say it would effectively kill off many federal efforts to curb sex trafficking and put the lives of large numbers of children at risk.
Click to expand...

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...y-alexander-acosta-sex-trafficking-budget-cut
 
K1052 said:
Has anyone considered that this government is actually pro child sex trafficking?
Click to expand...

It is not that they are pro child sex trafficking, it is just that they don't care about it as long as it is being done by the aristocratic class. Not really pro child sex trafficking, just pro creepy super rich dudes. Just like every other time in history when the aristocracy became too powerful their decadency falls into shockingly immoral debauchery.
 
SMOGZINN said:
It is not that they are pro child sex trafficking, it is just that they don't care about it as long as it is being done by the aristocratic class. Not really pro child sex trafficking, just pro creepy super rich dudes. Just like every other time in history when the aristocracy became too powerful their decadency falls into shockingly immoral debauchery.
Click to expand...

Yes, I think 'sex trafficking indifferent' would be a better way to put it.
 
This whole affair is coming off like a Ray Donovan mini-series.

So who is going to be "the fixer(s)" in this scandal? I'm so sure there's bound to be all manner of skullduggerous fixing for Epstein to once again get his palms whacked with a six inch ruler by the powers that be in order to keep their names from being named by him.
 
pmv said:
Fallen? I can't remember a time I didn't detest that guy. An anti-feminist anti-Palestinian pro-torture pro-war rich conservative. I haven't followed his every stance on everything, but I can't remember him ever having a position on anything that wasn't very much on the right.

I used to see him as an example of how weirdly right-wing US 'liberals' are, though it seems as if those liberals no longer regard him as one of their own.
Click to expand...


Same here, I've never been able to understand what people see in that sniveling douchebag, and that was before he started carrying water for Team Treason.
 
UNCjigga said:
Trump serves Putin.

Putin derives power from the oligarchs and Russian gangsters he enables.

Some of the oligarchs and Russian gangsters benefit from child sex trafficking.

What’s the problem, then?
Click to expand...

I've been saying this for some time. Turmp and too many of his friends benefit and/or partook as well.

When Russia said adoptions, they were meaning sex trafficking (and very likely sex trafficking of minors). The Turmp's knew that (they had buddied up to Russian mafia before getting in Putin's good graces, there's zero chance they didn't at least know about it; I personally would guess they've been involved in it and not just as customers or friends of other people doing it).

When Russia responded to Obama's sanctions with a ban on adoption, it was a very targeted message to what now appears to be a glut of wealthy individuals in the US. And it was around that same time that a lot of the pics of Republicans with various Russians came from. That's not a coincidence.
 
WHY are Epstein's accusers taken so seriously and credible while those accusing Donald Trump of the same are tossed aside and the press hardly gives Trump's accusers any coverage or credibility at all.
Explain this to me.
 
Holy shit

After Acosta's press conference where he blamed everything on the FL state prosecutors we've got this from the former FL state attorney;

Former Florida state attorney Barry Krischer, however, blasted Acosta in a statement on Wednesday following the secretary’s press conference, calling Acosta’s recollection “completely wrong.”

“Federal prosecutors do not take a back seat to state prosecutors. That’s not how the system works in the real world,” Krischer said.

Krischer claimed that his office conducted a complete investigation, which prompted a grand jury to produce a single felony indictment of soliciting prostitution. He also claimed that Acosta’s office produced a 53-page indictment, which was subsequently abandoned after “secret negotiations between Mr. Epstein’s lawyers and Mr. Acosta.”

“If Mr. Acosta was truly concerned with the State’s case and felt he had to rescue the matter, he would have moved forward with the 53-page indictment that his own office drafted. Instead, Mr. Acosta brokered a secret plea deal that resulted in a Non-Prosecution Agreement in violation of the Crime Victim’s Rights Act,” he said.

“Mr. Acosta should not be allowed to rewrite history.”
Click to expand...

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/po...-epstein-fallout-n1028211?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_ma

You don't bury a federal indictment for nothing.
 
K1052 said:
Holy shit

After Acosta's press conference where he blamed everything on the FL state prosecutors we've got this from the former FL state attorney;



https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/po...-epstein-fallout-n1028211?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_ma

You don't bury a federal indictment for nothing.
Click to expand...

Dunno what the guy is bitching about. Acosta wrangled him a guilty plea for a difficult case he might have lost in court. All he had from the grand jury was a single count of soliciting. It was also his office that granted Epstein work release.
 
kage69 said:
I love how Mr. Grab'em By The Pussy with 22 credible sexual assault accusers wasted no time in disavowing the guy.

"We had a falling out."

Yeah, Epstein probably said No when Trump asked if he could bring Ivanka on the orgy boat.
Click to expand...

Uh, there are plenty of accounts of Trump distancing himself from Epstein over a decade ago for trying to recuit underage daughters of guests at Mar a Lago....
 
blackangst1 said:
Uh, there are plenty of accounts of Trump distancing himself from Epstein over a decade ago for trying to recuit underage daughters of guests at Mar a Lago....
Click to expand...

Not daughters of guests. It's all based off a contention by Giuffre's lawyer, the towel girl in question. There's no indication that the alleged ban took place before the accusations against Epstein first surfaced. Lots of people tried to disassociate themselves from Epstein when that happened.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top