• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Jeffrey Epstein Commits Suicide at Manhattan Jail

Page 79 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Jaskalas said:
Look, it took them 11 months to redact Trump from these files.
They'll need more time to edit the rest.
Click to expand...

Not only that


It cost us 850k

www.snopes.com

FBI paid nearly $1M in overtime to redact Epstein files, documents show

Bloomberg reporter Jason Leopold sued the FBI and DOJ for the files as part of a Freedom of Information Act request.
www.snopes.com www.snopes.com

And get this .. it was called …

These files indicated that the agency had spent at least $851,344 the week of March 17, 2025, in overtime pay for 934 agents mobilized to process and redact the Epstein files as part of a project called Epstein Transparency Project 2025.
 
So will we ever see the files that Bondi redacted to protect her boss? I think not, although I'm somewhat satisfied with the level of psychotic damage that Trump's already experiencing from this scandal. Meh, I trust that karma has got Trump pegged dead to rights on the crimes he perpetrated against the laws of the land and the people those laws are meant to protect and like how Trump pays back ten fold on his perceived enemies, karma will pay back in kind.
 
There's a torrent on i2p that still has the missing pdf in the dataset. I'm debating if it's worth my time and very limited drive space to get a copy of the bullshit files.
 
I LOL’d at a right wing excuse to dismiss Epstein

“Y’all didn’t believe Pizzagate. Epstein is just like that except change the characters so why should we believe this…”
 
I'm sure greenman considers it a perfect release with the vanishing files and photos of Trump not actually being there, in fact, because where are they, libtards?

but I'd also imagine that he should be a bit disappointed because we all know for a plain fact that he really really likes pedophiles. he must be so confused now: how to accept the abject lies from the administration at the same time he wants to maintain support for his very favorite pedophile from all the pedophiles. He must be confused.
 
zinfamous said:
I'm sure greenman considers it a perfect release with the vanishing files and photos of Trump not actually being there, in fact, because where are they, libtards?

but I'd also imagine that he should be a bit disappointed because we all know for a plain fact that he really really likes pedophiles. he must be so confused now: how to accept the abject lies from the administration at the same time he wants to maintain support for his very favorite pedophile from all the pedophiles. He must be confused.
Click to expand...
I would imagine he would say 'Trump has never been convicted of anything involving Epstein and therefore we can't say anything.

Of course he said that with Trump's other cases and then 34 felony convictions later was like 'yeah those are fine too.'
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top