I'll quote some of the more important bullets provided in CQuinn's link:
Visit the site for dozens of relevant links to the specific court cases.
February 25, 1990
Ms. Schiavo suffers cardiac arrest, apparently caused by a potassium imbalance and leading to brain damage due to lack of oxygen. She was taken to the Humana Northside Hospital and was later given a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) to provide nutrition and hydration.Police Report
June 18, 1990
Court appoints Michael Schiavo as guardian; Ms. Schiavo?s parents do not object.
July 29, 1993
Schindlers attempt to remove Michael Schiavo as Ms. Schiavo?s guardian; the court later dismisses the suit.
March 1, 1994
First guardian ad litem, John H. Pecarek, submits his report. He states that Michael Schiavo has acted appropriately and attentively toward Ms. Schiavo.
May 1998
Michael Schiavo petitions the court to authorize the removal of Ms. Schiavo?s PEG tube; the Schindlers oppose, saying that she would want to remain alive. The court appoints Richard Pearse, Esq., to serve as the second guardian ad litem for Ms. Schiavo.
December 20, 1998
The second guardian ad litem, Richard Pearse, Esq., issues his report in which he concludes that Ms. Schiavo is in a persistent vegetative state with no chance of improvement and that Michael Schiavo?s decision-making may be influenced by the potential to inherit the remainder of Ms. Schiavo?s estate. (the latter statement about the greed maybe a little over the top but if that's the PROFESSIONAL opinion by an unbiased court-appointed guardian to review the case then I'll stick by it. I'm not one to by anti-decisions because they're not favorable to me)
February 11, 2000
Judge Greer rules that Ms. Schiavo would have chosen to have the PEG tube removed, and therefore he orders it removed, which, according to doctors, will cause her death in approximately 7 to 14 days.
March 2, 2000 - April 25, 2001
Motion after motion is denied by the judge to the Schindlers (read the site for a detailed listing of the decisions and appropriate links).
April 26, 2001
The Schindlers file an emergency motion with Judge Greer for relief from judgment based upon new evidence, which includes a claim that a former girlfriend of Michael Schiavo will testify that he lied about Ms. Schiavo?s wishes; Judge Greer dismisses the motion as untimely. Also on this date, the Schindlers file a new civil suit that claims that Michael Schiavo perjured himself when he testified that Ms. Schiavo had stated an aversion to remaining on life support. Pending this new civil trial, Circuit Court Judge Frank Quesada orders Ms. Schiavo?s PEG tube to be reinserted.
November 15, 2002
The Schindlers contend that Michael Schiavo might have abused Ms. Schiavo and this abuse led to her condition. They ask the court for more time to collect evidence, and to remove Michael Schiavo as guardian. (First formal declaration that Michael Schaivo was unfit...waiting 10years...?)
September 17, 2003
Judge Greer orders the removal of the PEG tube to take place on October 15, 2003. He also rejects the Schindlers? request that Ms. Schiavo be given therapy to learn how to eat without the tube.
October 7, 2003
Governor Jeb Bush files a federal court brief in support of the Schindlers? effort to stop the removal of the PEG tube.
October 15, 2003
Ms. Schiavo?s PEG tube is once again removed.
October 20, 2003
The Florida House of Representatives passes a bill, ?Terri?s Law,? that allows the governor to issue a ?one-time stay in certain cases.? (The border between the legislative and the executive branches is where exactly?)
October 21, 2003
The Florida Senate passes the bill; Governor Bush issues an executive order directing reinsertion of the PEG tube and appointing a guardian ad litem for Ms. Schiavo.
October 29, 2003
Michael Schiavo files court papers in his state-court lawsuit, arguing that ?Terri?s Law? is unconstitutional. The American Civil Liberties Union has joined Michael Schiavo.
November 4, 2003
Governor Jeb Bush asks Circuit Court Judge W. Douglas Baird to dismiss Michael Schiavo?s suit (filed October 21, 2003) that challenges ?Terri?s Law.?
November 8, 2003
Judge Baird denies Governor Bush?s motion to dismiss the state-court suit.
November 10, 2003
Governor Bush appeals Judge Baird?s decision; the filing of the appeal has the effect of staying the removal of Ms. Schiavo?s PEG tube.
November 21, 2003
Florida Sens. Stephen Wise and Jim Sebesta introduce legislation (S692) that would require persons in persistent vegetative states to be administered medically supplied nutrition and hydration in the absence of a living will, regardless of family beliefs about what those patients would have wanted. The measure is withdrawn from consideration on April 16, 2004.
December 1, 2003
University of South Florida Prof. Jay Wolfson, guardian ad litem, concludes in his report that Ms. Schiavo is in a persistent vegetative state with no chance of improvement.
March 29, 2004
Nursing home workers discover 4 ?fresh puncture wounds? on one arm and a fifth wound on the other arm; the workers state that a hypodermic needle appears to have caused the wounds. Attendants discovered the wounds shortly after the Schindlers visited Ms. Schiavo for 45 minutes. Toxicology reports indicate that no substance was injected into Ms. Schiavo. Clearwater police later conclude that the marks might have been made by a device used to move Ms. Schiavo and, in any case, that no evidence of abuse or other wrongdoing could be found
May 6, 2004
Pinellas Circuit Judge W. Douglas Baird rules that "Terri's Law," sought and signed by Gov. Bush and approved by the Legislature on October 21, 2003, is unconstitutional. The governor appeals the ruling
August 31, 2004
The Florida Supreme Court hears oral arguments in the lawsuit over the
constitutionality of "Terri's Law."
September 23, 2004
Florida's Supreme Court, unanimously affirming the trial court order, declares "Terri's Law" unconstitutional
This is all I have time for now, sorry. Got to go out to pick up my g/f. Will amend later if needbe.
Visit the site for dozens of relevant links to the specific court cases.