Just saw it. Meh, it was okay. First one is still the best. 2 & 3 were so-so. 4 with Renner was a fun popcorn movie, although it ended right when you thought it was going to get good! 5 felt like Damon saw that 4 did well and wanted to get back in on the action. Overall, it felt like it had the skeleton to be good, but never really fleshed out any of the big parts to make it really good. It was kind of about his dad's killer...it was kind of about the Facebook data mining deal...for a moment, it was kind of about Bourne finding a purpose in life. One of the things that made the first one great was it was a very focused movie: "who am I?" This was kind of all over the map. They could have easily fleshed the story out into another awesome trilogy imo...so much fodder in the news from Snowden, Manning, Petraeus, DNC & Russia, etc., and the fallout that could potentially happen from that information becoming public.
The tech portion was accurate, but felt patronizing. The cliche nod to Snowden. The cliche nod users giving 'Facebook' all of their info freely & the government tapping it. The car chase in Vegas was pretty fun (although I kept waiting for the Charger to break down...holla FCA & #garage!

). The anarchist who Bourne took the USB stick to felt like he should have been a bigger part of the story. You knew Stiles was out because that's how the Bourne movies roll. Nice twist at the end with the video recording. TLJ felt like he was in there just because he was famous...he did such a good job in The Fugitive, you would have thought they would have used him in that kind of capacity as a really focused hunter or something.
Whereas I re-watch the first Bourne movie on a regular basis because it's awesome, I'll probably never re-watch this one. Worth a watch, sure, worth a re-watch, meh.