- Aug 26, 2012
- 241
- 0
- 0
If they only deployed a fraction of the resources that the Americans did then they simply could not have rivaled the American program in advancement toward an A-bomb. There is no short-cutting the enrichment process. If a nation wants an A-bomb from scratch it has to enrich lots of uranium which is incredibly expensive in terms of infrastructure and energy. Japan had many strengths in WWII, abundant energy wasn't one of them. In short, I'm skeptical.With a fraction of the men and resources, the Japanese nuclear program almost rivals the American nuclear program.
This is humbling.
If they only deployed a fraction of the resources that the Americans did then they simply could not have rivaled the American program in advancement toward an A-bomb. There is no short-cutting the enrichment process. If a nation wants an A-bomb from scratch it has to enrich lots of uranium which is incredibly expensive in terms of infrastructure and energy. Japan had many strengths in WWII, abundant energy wasn't one of them. In short, I'm skeptical.
watch it
why would they lie?
they had 2 separate programs and they both were inches away from the a-bomb
Where were the Japanese enrichment plants? Where was the power source to provide the electricty to run these enrichment plants? No enrichment => no A-bomb. End of story.why would the scientists lie?
45 minutes long!? What the crap! Can you just summarize it in a few sentences. Make sure they are short sentences too! My attention span can't do more than that.
With a fraction of the men and resources, the Japanese nuclear program almost rivals the American nuclear program.
This is humbling.
With a fraction of the men and resources, the Japanese nuclear program almost rivals the American nuclear program.
This is humbling.
With a fraction of the men and resources, the Japanese nuclear program almost rivals the American nuclear program.
This is humbling.
Germans were close also.Plus they also had a delivery system in the V 10.