Phynaz coming at Intel s rescue...
Who else would have picked the only game out of 7
that has low-ish fps as an evidence of Llano not giving
enough frame rates ??..
Btw, is CIV5 a game not very playable at low fps ??..![]()
Selling cheap in a short term for a new product and users will gain brand confidence in a long term
I wonder what sort of laptop you'd want for gaming? One that lasts 30 minutes unless plugged into a wall?
I've never heard of this. I really don't know how cheap builds a brand.
The problem with selling cheap is you set your price. Let me give you a couple of examples.
I don't game at an laptop, jus as I don't encode on my phone.
Gaming laptop...two words combiend that dosn't make sense.
And neither of these solutions produce what i would call playable....try a little less harder. :thumbsdown:
So your idea of selling is to set the initial price high and lower it as time goes by to give an impression that the product is getting cheaper.
I'm sure there will be many AMD users who would be pissed as well if they saw a brand they look forward to having the lowest price suddenly have a high price. Though I might agree that AMD should raise the price a little bit but at least its affordable. I can't or would not pay $999 for a chip.
I'm sure AMD knows how much they want to charge for their CPUs and nothing that me or you can say to change the possibility that their decision is good or bad.
Remember how high and how long the 5870 kept its price tag?
Hey guess what, you aren't the target market. Therefore your comments on the chip are meaningless.
Thank you for proving my point.
The target market i being drummed and and put on EPO by fanboys right now.
It's a niche product...just like most thing AMD has to offer.
The holes Intel cannot see a big profit margin in.
Yeah...how many people need 8 threads in a laptop exactly? A lot less than people who game on a laptop and that's for certain. In fact, make that 4 threads.
So now it's not about "gaming"?
Keep moving the goalposts...AMD75.
No I was merely pointing out that your "niche product" point was laughable considering what most people need in a laptop.
Do you think the majority of people would make use of the extra graphics horsepower or the extra cpu horsepower?
Even if you are daft enough to believe it's the latter, would you pay an extra $200 for it? If so, you probably own a Mac, and probably an ipad too.
Can you use more fallaices.
The majority of people buying a laptop dosn't give a rats arse about "gaming".
And if we are talking CPU power...Intel has the crown there sorry, but you fanatsy world is nothing more than...fantasy.
And if you think I own anything Crapple, you make me laugh.
Does AMD support notebook Crossfire between the on-die GPU and an add-in card?
Does AMD support notebook Crossfire between the on-die GPU and an add-in card?
I'm only aware of Optimus type switching.
Does AMD support notebook Crossfire between the on-die GPU and an add-in card?
I'm only aware of Optimus type switching.