The Nazi's did not own the means of production. They merely controlled it. It's more in line with what many in this country want.
Don't add further to the idiocy by ignoring the differences between fascism and socialism.
Industry is a center of wealth generation, governments' power derives in part from it.
That's not particular to any ideology. While every credible form of government involves some relationship between industry and government, there are big differences.
You might recall the end goal of communism was essentially no government at all. That's about as practical as your argument of fascism and socialism's similarity.
Hitler's 'control' of industry included a militarist government and authoritarianism; a socialist government is more likely to 'control' industry to protect the people from exploitation.
For example, Chile nationalized its copper mining, its top resource, away from US corporations who were extracting massive wealth. This was credited with greatly aiding their economy, keeping the wealth in Chilean society (and somewhat in the better buildings helping in the earthquake) - it's a far different motive than fascist control.
If you can't tell the difference between the 'control' practiced by a Nazi Germany and a Sweden, you need to get a bit more informed.