Originally posted by: NinjaGnome
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: NinjaGnome
Well she let me borrow it while i was there as something to remind me of her and I lost it somewhere. So these people have no case and I should just not pick up the calls? I also wrote a check at one time but didnt sign it and they are saying that since I had intent to pay and that I didnt sign then it is considered a bad check, is she telling the truth?
Clarify what you mean about the check. Yes, I'd ignore the calls, or have the number blocked.
They called one day while I was hammered and I wrote a check but didnt sign it. she says that this is considered a bad check. so they have an unsigned 90.10 check.
Dude, lol.. Let them sign the check and cash it. If they're that stupid, they deserve everything you can throw at them.Originally posted by: NinjaGnome
Originally posted by: Eli
Ahh.Originally posted by: NinjaGnome
Originally posted by: Eli
Wait, they have the check in their posession?Originally posted by: NinjaGnome
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: NinjaGnome
Well she let me borrow it while i was there as something to remind me of her and I lost it somewhere. So these people have no case and I should just not pick up the calls? I also wrote a check at one time but didnt sign it and they are saying that since I had intent to pay and that I didnt sign then it is considered a bad check, is she telling the truth?
Clarify what you mean about the check. Yes, I'd ignore the calls, or have the number blocked.
They called one day while I was hammered and I wrote a check but didnt sign it. she says that this is considered a bad check. so they have an unsigned 90.10 check.
yes they do
Well, regardless, i'm still positive it's not a bad check. It was never good in the first place.
And if they forge your signature and cash it, nail them. :evil:
Thats the only thing im most worried about and since I dont know the law as well as a lawyer would its the only thing im paranoid about
Originally posted by: Eli
I don't think so. What is "intent to pay", anyway? I don't think it actually means anything, as far as the law goes.Originally posted by: NinjaGnome
so since they have that check would that screw me over?
So you started to fill out a check, and then they said something to piss you off or something, and you stopped. Who knows. I don't think it has any bearing on this "case", lol.
Heh. That's interesting. So basically, just hope you get a nice judge? Heh..Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: Eli
I don't think so. What is "intent to pay", anyway? I don't think it actually means anything, as far as the law goes.Originally posted by: NinjaGnome
so since they have that check would that screw me over?
So you started to fill out a check, and then they said something to piss you off or something, and you stopped. Who knows. I don't think it has any bearing on this "case", lol.
Small claims is really big on something like that. Sometimes a judge will see culpability if someone was willing to pay, whereas others are less naive and know that people will offer to pay for stuff just to get people to leave them alone.
Well I see this as a good VS. evil sort of thing and I know it would be easier to pay the money but then evil would win. Its not the 90 bux its the fact that these people dont deserve anything from me or anyone.
They called one day while I was hammered and I wrote a check but didnt sign it. she says that this is considered a bad check. so they have an unsigned 90.10 check.
Originally posted by: NinjaGnome
so this check is pretty much gonna lose it for me huh? what if I told them to send me the check through the mail so i can sign it and then rip it up? It may be wrong but then theyd have nothing to hang over my head. naw nevermind I havent done anything wrong yet no point on starting now.
Originally posted by: NinjaGnome
It is purely a matter of principle, I just couldnt take it if I paid because that means they would be winning.
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: NinjaGnome
so this check is pretty much gonna lose it for me huh? what if I told them to send me the check through the mail so i can sign it and then rip it up? It may be wrong but then theyd have nothing to hang over my head. naw nevermind I havent done anything wrong yet no point on starting now.
No, you didn't read my post. The check isn't going to harm you that much, but you certainly need to talk to your bank. She's not going to sue you in the first place. I'd be very suprised. There's filing fee for even small claims I believe, and it can range from 1-100(or whatever). I don't think she'll do it, but if she does you've got receipts and hopefully pictures of, or the actual property that was damaged. You've got your property back in your possession. There's nothing between you two to state it was anything other than a gift. I think you are fretting WAY too much of this little problem. Talk to the bank, handle the check, and then ignore those stupid sons-of-bitches.
Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
Originally posted by: NinjaGnome
It is purely a matter of principle, I just couldnt take it if I paid because that means they would be winning.
A Pyrrhic victory
A victory gained at too great a cost: like that of the Greek leader Pyrrhus over the Romans in 279BC
Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
Originally posted by: NinjaGnome
It is purely a matter of principle, I just couldnt take it if I paid because that means they would be winning.
A Pyrrhic victory
A victory gained at too great a cost: like that of the Greek leader Pyrrhus over the Romans in 279BC
Originally posted by: NinjaGnome
Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
Originally posted by: NinjaGnome
It is purely a matter of principle, I just couldnt take it if I paid because that means they would be winning.
A Pyrrhic victory
A victory gained at too great a cost: like that of the Greek leader Pyrrhus over the Romans in 279BC
I think it wouldnt be at that great a cost since im just going to ignore her phonecalls and if she takes me to court im more than prepared. I mean they are in the wrong and her mother doesnt know what shes talking about.
Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
Originally posted by: NinjaGnome
It is purely a matter of principle, I just couldnt take it if I paid because that means they would be winning.
A Pyrrhic victory
A victory gained at too great a cost: like that of the Greek leader Pyrrhus over the Romans in 279BC
Originally posted by: flot
Dude, pay the $90. That isn't "giving into them", that's "being a bigger man."
It obviously isn't worth all the time and aggrivation. Write them a new check and feel free to put "for the ring that I lost from the bitch who cheated on me" in the notes field on the check. Voila, now you're even.
I understand. Hassel or not, it's just not nice to be taken to the cleaners like she's trying to do.Originally posted by: NinjaGnome
Well I see this as a good VS. evil sort of thing and I know it would be easier to pay the money but then evil would win. Its not the 90 bux its the fact that these people dont deserve anything from me or anyone.
Originally posted by: Eli
lol..
Go over there to "sign the check", and then walk out with it. When they greet you at the door, just stand there. Don't say anything, except maybe something like, "let's get this overwith". When they hand it to you to sign, casually turn around walk back to your car, and drive home. Oh man, I would so do that.. It would be classic.
That'd really piss 'em off.And there's no way they could "get you" for taking back your own, unsigned, check.
Don't forget to smile and wave as you drive off.
I agree with Mill. I doubt they'll sue you. But then again, you know these people better than we do.
I was serious about printing something that makes them acknowledge they broke your computer stuff.
Hell, include something about how you're not responsible for the ring, too. When you go over there to "sign the check", state that they both need to sign the piece of paper to consider this settled and done. I bet they won't even read it.![]()
