Thanks, that sounds really good! Any idea which brands of DC adaptors are most efficient and reliable? That's some really hard to find info...
There s no info, the only way to know is eventualy to measure the current drain with a multimeter whith the device not supplying anything, generaly laptops DC adaptators are of good quality in this respect.
edit: also, will using 12V for the DC adapter reduce consumption even more? Does it matter how much Watt the adapter is? I know that ATX PSUs are most efficient between 20-80%, but no idea how that works for DC adaptors.
I benefit from the question to give some precisions.
The DC supplied motherboard, the Asrock AM1H ITX, effectively consume less with lower voltage than the official 19V, but there s a limit that is variable, in my MB it was 13V, under wich the MB didnt boot, that s why i m advising 15-16V.
On the other hand Pico PSUs can be used with any MB but ther s a few remarks, only the +5V, +3.3V, -5V, -12V voltages are generated by the little power converter card, the +12V, wich is the most demanding is supplied directly from the DC adaptator, the other voltages are extracted from this one thanks to the DC-DC converters that are in the little PCB.
And then there is cases like the Antec ISK110 wich use a 19V DC adaptator, wich is included, that is plugged on a PCB inside the case and wich has converters for all the voltages mentioned above, including the +12V wich is also generated out of the common 19V voltage, this PCB has the usual outputs of an ATX PSU, that is a 24 pin connector as well as SATA power cables.
So far the best efficency i got from option 1 and 3 was 1, Pico PSUs looks to have a correct efficency but given the price the two other solutions make also sense, the Asrock is pricey, at about 50-60$, and require a 20-30$ DC adaptator, the Antec case should be in the 60-70$ and can use a 30$ MB, this is a better option since there s also the casing and that it only 20$ more.