Ask her and we'll both know.Originally posted by: conjur
Why did Rice admit those 16 words should NOT have been in the SotU address?
The most narrow-minded question of the three. The Democrats play the same brand of politics. Read the "additional views" section of the SSIC report if you don't believe me. As far as "reading more into the story than is there", who first went to the media and whined to everyone with a microphone or newspaper press? And I ask you again, if Uncle Joe (now an "advisor" to Kerry) is so forthcoming, then why haven't the other DemocRAT senators on the committee rose to his defense?Why are the Republicans on the SIC playing partisan politics and reading more into the story than is there?
Why is Cannistrano now included in this discussion? Where have I alluded to or dismissed old Vince? Oh wait, the answer is obvious now! Another "move the goalposts" maneuver so typical of this country's leftist factions nowadays.Why are you dismissing Vincent Cannistraro's testimony?
But hey, you must mean the same Vincent Cannistrano who told NPR in '99 that "?Iraq's contacts with bin Laden go back some years, to at least 1994, when, according to one U.S. government source, Hijazi met him when bin Laden lived in Sudan." According to Cannistraro, "Iraq invited bin Laden to live in Baghdad to be nearer to potential targets of terrorist attack in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait". Yes, of course.
