It's official. Trump considering pardoning convicted sex trafficker and rapist of young girls, Ghislane Maxwell

[pcgeek11]

Once again what is the third option if my assertion is so "silly"? What is really silly? There is no amount of logic you can use to concoct a third option. You are happy continuing your support of a pedophile.

Do we have hard evidence Trump participated in illegal activities? No. However there is tons of circumstantial evidence. That isn't enough to find Trump guilty but you would have us believe...

The DOJ lying about the Epstein files claiming there is nothing there isn't evidence of a massive coverup of who committed those illegal acts. We know Trump orders Bondi what to do. We also know nothing is legally stopping the FBI from releasing them. Files are being covered up to protect who us in them. We all know if the list were all Democrats the files would have been released yesterday.

Well then what is the point to all this BS then.

You already have all the answers you need since you know it all. /s

 

[pcgeek11]

Well, there you go, you believe in option #2, Trump is covering up for people that engaged in activity with sexually trafficked young girls. Why is it so hard to just say that?

I didn't say that Trump was covering anything up.
I did say that I believe that Epstein was a sex trafficker of underage girls.

I think they should release the documents ASAP with witness' names redacted.

As to who or why or if people are covering up anything is just speculation.

 

[pcgeek11]

The pedophiles are listed in the files. We don't know who they are. DOJ knows who they are. They are refusing to release the files.

So you have seen the files?

 

[APU_Fusion]

There is a reason Mike Johnson won’t swear in the one vote that would force release of the Epstein files. He is protecting pedophiles. Why would he care about Epstein files if Trump is not in them? Why won’t Trump release them if they are democratic hoax or nothing burger. The naïveté of people or bad faith arguments are amusing.

 

[nakedfrog]

I didn't say that Trump was covering anything up.
I did say that I believe that Epstein was a sex trafficker of underage girls.

I think they should release the documents ASAP with witness' names redacted.

As to who or why or if people are covering up anything is just speculation.

So the facts are this: the files exist. Trump is in a position to direct for the release of them. You do not believe Trump himself is in the files. Other than covering up for other people, what reason could there possibly be for him to continue to resist doing so?

 

[HomerJS]

Well then what is the point to all this BS then.

You already have all the answers you need since you know it all. /s

Nice strawman dodge because you are too much of a coward to answer the question. Who knew how much you loved pedophiles.

 

[iRONic]

Who knew how much you loved pedophiles.

ME! ME! ME!

 

[outriding]

I didn't say that Trump was covering anything up.
I did say that I believe that Epstein was a sex trafficker of underage girls.

I think they should release the documents ASAP with witness' names redacted.

As to who or why or if people are covering up anything is just speculation.

You want the witness names redacted.


That is just a weird and creepy thing to say

 

[cytg111]

I didn't say that Trump was covering anything up.
I did say that I believe that Epstein was a sex trafficker of underage girls.

I think they should release the documents ASAP with witness' names redacted.

As to who or why or if people are covering up anything is just speculation.

I assume you did not see Pam Bondi "answering" questions in that Senate hearing.

If you watch that and at the end dont be like "what the fuck" and "is she hiding" on "Epstein" ... then I can only deduce that this person must be the biggest sucker in human history and that he have been taken advantage of his whole life.

 

[nakedfrog]

I assume you did not see Pam Bondi "answering" questions in that Senate hearing.

If you watch that and at the end dont be like "what the fuck" and "is she hiding" on "Epstein" ... then I can only deduce that this person must be the biggest sucker in human history and that he have been taken advantage of his whole life.

That's the neat part, he won't!

 

[pcgeek11]

You want the witness names redacted.


That is just a weird and creepy thing to say

I read that the court already has insisted that the prosecutions witness' identities be protected. It is a common practice.

 

[outriding]

I read that the court already has insisted that the prosecutions witness' identities be protected. It is a common practice.

But not the victims?

If they are documents there is nothing to witness it is not like the document is going to say jimbo witnessed Mary giving trump a handy…

It is just another ploy to redact to protect the perpetrators…

The only thing that should be redacted is the victims

 

[pcgeek11]

But not the victims?

If they are documents there is nothing to witness it is not like the document is going to say jimbo witnessed Mary giving trump a handy…

It is just another ploy to redact to protect the perpetrators…

The only thing that should be redacted is the victims

I inadvertently left out the victims...

I agree victims and witness' IDs should be protected.