• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Itanium still Lives!

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Intel will keep improving Itanium and it'll keep gaining share from POWER/SPARC.

This is the typical Intel playbook...first few iterations suck, but keep getting better and better until everyone goes, "holy crap, Intel owns this space".
 
Intel17 said:
Intel will keep improving Itanium and it'll keep gaining share from POWER/SPARC.

This is the typical Intel playbook...first few iterations suck, but keep getting better and better until everyone goes, "holy crap, Intel owns this space".
Click to expand...
Given that Itanium has among the least restrictive implementation environments (granted, not hard when the competition is IBM 🙂), I think the only big question is whether or not x86 with boatloads of RAS will consume Itanium's market(s) or not, given time (demand for improved RAS on x86, as sizes of data sets increase, exists regardless of Power, SPARC, or Itanium).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top