• Guest, The rules for the P & N subforum have been updated to prohibit "ad hominem" or personal attacks against other posters. See the full details in the post "Politics and News Rules & Guidelines."

It was Rove.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,388
1,013
126
I thought everybody knew that conservatives are stupid and liberals are commie traitors.
I thought it was that conservatives are racist, homophobic, uncompassionate, sex-obsessed idiots, and that liberals were dope smoking, patchoulli oil wearing, non-leg shaving, "free Mumia" button-wearing unrealistic pie-in-the sky listening to too much folk music commie traitors?
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Originally posted by: glenn1
I thought everybody knew that conservatives are stupid and liberals are commie traitors.
I thought it was that conservatives are racist, homophobic, uncompassionate, sex-obsessed idiots, and that liberals were dope smoking, patchoulli oil wearing, non-leg shaving, "free Mumia" button-wearing unrealistic pie-in-the sky listening to too much folk music commie traitors?
You forgot "hypocritical" and "tree-hugging" respectively.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,136
37
91
BOBDN, it was I who named names. Now, where do I get my treasons? It sounds so delicious.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
66,933
3,738
126
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Originally posted by: glenn1
I thought everybody knew that conservatives are stupid and liberals are commie traitors.
I thought it was that conservatives are racist, homophobic, uncompassionate, sex-obsessed idiots, and that liberals were dope smoking, patchoulli oil wearing, non-leg shaving, "free Mumia" button-wearing unrealistic pie-in-the sky listening to too much folk music commie traitors?
You forgot "hypocritical" and "tree-hugging" respectively.
Well sure, but I was talking to the stupids. You need to know your audience.

 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
66,933
3,738
126
Originally posted by: Dari
BOBDN, it was I who named names. Now, where do I get my treasons? It sounds so delicious.
This is what we get after an edit? I hate to think what it looked like before.

 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Dari
BOBDN, it was I who named names. Now, where do I get my treasons? It sounds so delicious.
This is what we get after an edit? I hate to think what it looked like before.
LOL. Moonbeam, you crack me up! :D
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,136
37
91
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Dari
BOBDN, it was I who named names. Now, where do I get my treasons? It sounds so delicious.
This is what we get after an edit? I hate to think what it looked like before.
LOL. Moonbeam, you crack me up! :D
Was he your first?
 

digitalsm

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2003
5,253
0
0
Show me the proof. Oh wait, you dont have any.

The most these people can get is 10 years in federal prison.

Im doubtful the FBI can pin point the people who did it.

All you are doing is playing semantics with words. Interperting it to fit your beliefs.
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Dari
BOBDN, it was I who named names. Now, where do I get my treasons? It sounds so delicious.
This is what we get after an edit? I hate to think what it looked like before.
LOL. Moonbeam, you crack me up! :D
Was he your first?
Grow up little boy. Don't take yourself so seriously.
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Show me the proof. Oh wait, you dont have any.

The most these people can get is 10 years in federal prison.

Im doubtful the FBI can pin point the people who did it.

All you are doing is playing semantics with words. Interperting it to fit your beliefs.
Given that there hasn't been an on-topic post in this thread in five hours, your comments would be a lot more useful if you quoted what you're replying to.
 

digitalsm

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2003
5,253
0
0
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Show me the proof. Oh wait, you dont have any.

The most these people can get is 10 years in federal prison.

Im doubtful the FBI can pin point the people who did it.

All you are doing is playing semantics with words. Interperting it to fit your beliefs.
Given that there hasn't been an on-topic post in this thread in five hours, your comments would be a lot more useful if you quoted what you're replying to.
Uh that would be the original post. There has so far been not a single piece of evidence offered by anyone, pointing towards Rove. There just isnt. I also pointed out the fact, the max sentence for this crime is 10 years. I also pointed out the fact, that the FBI and DoJ rarely solve these cases.
 

Aegion

Member
Nov 13, 1999
154
0
0
The Washington Post is now claiming they have evidence from a highly placed source that the leak came directly from the White House.
On Saturday, a senior administration official told The Washington Post that before Novak's column appeared, two top White House officials called at least six journalists and disclosed the identity of Wilson's wife. The senior administration official said the leak was "meant purely and simply for revenge." Wilson had been sent by the CIA to Niger in 2002 to examine the nuclear claims.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A29560-2003Oct1_2.html
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,408
2
81
Originally posted by: Pandaren
this is the age old strategy of democrats/liberals...never debate or argue the facts, just call your...


This is the age old strategy of liberal and conservative extemists, nVidiots, fanATIcs, and Intel and AMD fanbois of all types, so spare me the partisan "[right wing/left wing] are always [something or the other].

.
Exactly. We should also include all the other Logical Fallacies as well which are practiced at one time or another in almost every thread by every poster on the internet. It would do us all well to study them I think for healthy debate.

BTW- HS you first line is riddled with Appeal to Motives, AdHom, Hasty Generalization, and Non-support. Not bad for a one liner. I'm sure reading your entire post we would have a case study.:p
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY