Israeli air raid struck UN Observation Post

[lozina]

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: lozina

Originally posted by: Aimster
Lebanon will rebuild and in 10-15 years it will be a beautiful country with no mullah fanatical islamic terrorist organizations.

Now while Israel is at it.. attack Iran and Syria. U.S needs to step up and use their military might and stop being afraid of losing troops.

The world will thank us in 50 years. Hell... Iran, Syria, Lebanon will thank us in 50 years.

I hope you realize you sound as barbaric and sick as those Hezbollah fanatics you mentioned previously. :thumbsdown:

How do I sound barbaric?

Those regimes need to change. They support terrorism.

Playing word games now?

What Israel is doing now in Lebanon could be clearly defined as "terrorism" as well. Unless you have your own definition of the word... Trying to coerce the Lebanese people to withdraw their support of Hezbollah through the use of violence is defined as terrorism.

Then you got on the other side of the fence opinions which do not match the US/Israeli view:

Iran is not a terrorist state

So you should clearly see that trying to justify any kind of military action affecting the lives of so many innocent people through the use of just stupid, vague terms such as "terrorism" is just that- stupid.

Then you make an assumption that Iran is developing nuclear weapons. Are they? Where is this proof? The same proof the US had about WMDs in Iraq? Are you going to bite the same hook twice in a row?

Syria and Iran created Hezbollah? Maybe... but did you bother checking why Hezbollah formed? Did it just form out of thin air with no reason? Or maybe- just maybe- because Israel was invading Lebanon and they needed some way to counter Israel's overwhelming military advantage? Hmm...

 

[imported_peachee]

The UN post was "shelled 14 times by Israeli artillery." This was "deliberate targeting." - bbc

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5215366.stm

This is a clear act of war against the world community. Israel seems to be really trying to start WWIII. We need to take away Israel's weapons of war so it can learn to make peace.

 

[smack Down]

Originally posted by: RichardE


So now you change your argument? 😕 I am just going to put it off to maybe lack of sleep or a long day, today you are really off of it.

Yup go cry yourself to sleep. Please explain how my argument changed at all. The attack was deliberate as Kofi annan claimed and it wasn't an accident. The bombs didn't go off couse and hit the U.N force.

 

[lozina]

Originally posted by: peachee
The UN post was "shelled 14 times by Israeli artillery." This was "deliberate targeting." - bbc

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5215366.stm

This is a clear act of war against the world community. Israel seems to be really trying to start WWIII. We need to take away Israel's weapons of war so it can learn to make peace.

With the information we have now it is a stretch to conclude this was anything deliberate. There is simply not enough evidence in my opinion to come to such a conclusion. Kofi might be making the biggest blunder of his career by making this accusation if he is not privy to some information we don't know about here

 

[ThePresence]

Originally posted by: lozina

Originally posted by: peachee
The UN post was "shelled 14 times by Israeli artillery." This was "deliberate targeting." - bbc

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5215366.stm

This is a clear act of war against the world community. Israel seems to be really trying to start WWIII. We need to take away Israel's weapons of war so it can learn to make peace.

With the information we have now it is a stretch to conclude this was anything deliberate. There is simply not enough evidence in my opinion to come to such a conclusion. Kofi might be making the biggest blunder of his career by making this accusation if he is not privy to some information we don't know about here

Oh please, Kofi has never been afraid of making knee-jerk Anti-Israel comments. Most of the world cheers on that sort of thing, especially in the UN. Again, for all those here, who's intensive investigations already concluded that this was deliberate, kindly state the motivation Israel would have to do such an insane thing? It's certainly not in their interest.

 

[ThePresence]

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE


So now you change your argument? 😕 I am just going to put it off to maybe lack of sleep or a long day, today you are really off of it.

Yup go cry yourself to sleep. Please explain how my argument changed at all. The attack was deliberate as Kofi annan claimed and it wasn't an accident. The bombs didn't go off couse and hit the U.N force.

That's not the only way to make a mistake, they can target the wrong building as well, obviously.

 

[ThePresence]

Originally posted by: peachee
The UN post was "shelled 14 times by Israeli artillery." This was "deliberate targeting." - bbc

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5215366.stm

This is a clear act of war against the world community. Israel seems to be really trying to start WWIII. We need to take away Israel's weapons of war so it can learn to make peace.

:roll:
I would reply to this, but what's the point?
Get comfortable, you'll fit right in here.

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: ThePresence

Originally posted by: lozina

Originally posted by: peachee
The UN post was "shelled 14 times by Israeli artillery." This was "deliberate targeting." - bbc

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5215366.stm

This is a clear act of war against the world community. Israel seems to be really trying to start WWIII. We need to take away Israel's weapons of war so it can learn to make peace.

With the information we have now it is a stretch to conclude this was anything deliberate. There is simply not enough evidence in my opinion to come to such a conclusion. Kofi might be making the biggest blunder of his career by making this accusation if he is not privy to some information we don't know about here

Oh please, Kofi has never been afraid of making knee-jerk Anti-Israel comments. Most of the world cheers on that sort of thing, especially in the UN. Again, for all those here, who's intensive investigations already concluded that this was deliberate, kindly state the motivation Israel would have to do such an insane thing? It's certainly not in their interest.

Yeah, I'm having a hard time trying to imagine a motive.

 

[imported_peachee]

Originally posted by: lozina

Originally posted by: peachee
The UN post was "shelled 14 times by Israeli artillery." This was "deliberate targeting." - bbc

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5215366.stm

This is a clear act of war against the world community. Israel seems to be really trying to start WWIII. We need to take away Israel's weapons of war so it can learn to make peace.

With the information we have now it is a stretch to conclude this was anything deliberate. There is simply not enough evidence in my opinion to come to such a conclusion. Kofi might be making the biggest blunder of his career by making this accusation if he is not privy to some information we don't know about here

So, attacking a target 14 times is definetely still an "accident" to you? With the United Nations observation post destroyed, where are we going to get objective information? From Israel, the attacker?

Without an objective peace keeping force, Israel has nothing to stop it from committing war crimes against the civilians. Israel has always been violently hostile to reporters who filmed attacks against Palestinian civlians.

How much destruction and death does Israel have to cause until you will ask Israel to take some responsibility? Seriously, how much? Spell it out.

 

[RichardE]

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE


So now you change your argument? 😕 I am just going to put it off to maybe lack of sleep or a long day, today you are really off of it.

Yup go cry yourself to sleep. Please explain how my argument changed at all. The attack was deliberate as Kofi annan claimed and it wasn't an accident. The bombs didn't go off couse and hit the U.N force.

UN outpost, not a UN force..


The UN was warned about being in a warzone...

Discarding even that information, why would Israel purposely target a UN outpost? You need to practice some analytical thinking here and try to think this through.

 

[Rainsford]

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE


So now you change your argument? 😕 I am just going to put it off to maybe lack of sleep or a long day, today you are really off of it.

Yup go cry yourself to sleep. Please explain how my argument changed at all. The attack was deliberate as Kofi annan claimed and it wasn't an accident. The bombs didn't go off couse and hit the U.N force.

UN outpost, not a UN force..


The UN was warned about being in a warzone...

Discarding even that information, why would Israel purposely target a UN outpost? You need to practice some analytical thinking here and try to think this through.

I'm not advocating any position here, but if you're looking for a potential motive, I'd say taking out a least a few of the world's eyes on the scene would be a good motivation. If Israel is doing something they shouldn't be (say, intentionally targeting innocent civilians), taking out the UN observation post would be a good idea so they can better cover it up.

Now I'm not saying that's what's going on here, but you need a little better imagination.

 

[RichardE]

Originally posted by: peachee

Originally posted by: lozina

Originally posted by: peachee
The UN post was "shelled 14 times by Israeli artillery." This was "deliberate targeting." - bbc

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5215366.stm

This is a clear act of war against the world community. Israel seems to be really trying to start WWIII. We need to take away Israel's weapons of war so it can learn to make peace.

With the information we have now it is a stretch to conclude this was anything deliberate. There is simply not enough evidence in my opinion to come to such a conclusion. Kofi might be making the biggest blunder of his career by making this accusation if he is not privy to some information we don't know about here

So, attacking a target 14 times is definetely still an "accident" to you? With the United Nations observation post destroyed, where are we going to get objective information? From Israel, the attacker?

Without an objective peace keeping force, Israel has nothing to stop it from committing war crimes against the civilians. Israel has always been violently hostile to reporters who filmed attacks against Palestinian civlians.

How much destruction and death does Israel have to cause until you will ask Israel to take some responsibility? Seriously, how much? Spell it out.

Perhaps when the UN actually cares enough to make a peacekeeping force (something they have always refused to do for Lebannon). Was bombing the UN an accident? 14 shells is a large number, but ask yourself, what would be the reason behing bombing a UN outpost? Again, analytical thinking comes into play, these are times when you have to take the information comming to you and look through it, taking everything from both sides with a grain a salt.

 

[RichardE]

Originally posted by: Rainsford

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE


So now you change your argument? 😕 I am just going to put it off to maybe lack of sleep or a long day, today you are really off of it.

Yup go cry yourself to sleep. Please explain how my argument changed at all. The attack was deliberate as Kofi annan claimed and it wasn't an accident. The bombs didn't go off couse and hit the U.N force.

UN outpost, not a UN force..


The UN was warned about being in a warzone...

Discarding even that information, why would Israel purposely target a UN outpost? You need to practice some analytical thinking here and try to think this through.

I'm not advocating any position here, but if you're looking for a potential motive, I'd say taking out a least a few of the world's eyes on the scene would be a good motivation. If Israel is doing something they shouldn't be (say, intentionally targeting innocent civilians), taking out the UN observation post would be a good idea so they can better cover it up.

Now I'm not saying that's what's going on here, but you need a little better imagination.

I considered that actually, than disregarded it. They have no reason to target civilians only, as well as the already low civillian death rate would be further proof they are not targeting civilians.

 

[smack Down]

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE


So now you change your argument? 😕 I am just going to put it off to maybe lack of sleep or a long day, today you are really off of it.

Yup go cry yourself to sleep. Please explain how my argument changed at all. The attack was deliberate as Kofi annan claimed and it wasn't an accident. The bombs didn't go off couse and hit the U.N force.

UN outpost, not a UN force..


The UN was warned about being in a warzone...

Discarding even that information, why would Israel purposely target a UN outpost? You need to practice some analytical thinking here and try to think this through.

Never said they would target it.

Israel gets about the same benifit from targeting the UN as they have with rest of this pointless war where they have accomplished nothing as they do targeting anything else.

 

[Rainsford]

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: Rainsford

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE


So now you change your argument? 😕 I am just going to put it off to maybe lack of sleep or a long day, today you are really off of it.

Yup go cry yourself to sleep. Please explain how my argument changed at all. The attack was deliberate as Kofi annan claimed and it wasn't an accident. The bombs didn't go off couse and hit the U.N force.

UN outpost, not a UN force..


The UN was warned about being in a warzone...

Discarding even that information, why would Israel purposely target a UN outpost? You need to practice some analytical thinking here and try to think this through.

I'm not advocating any position here, but if you're looking for a potential motive, I'd say taking out a least a few of the world's eyes on the scene would be a good motivation. If Israel is doing something they shouldn't be (say, intentionally targeting innocent civilians), taking out the UN observation post would be a good idea so they can better cover it up.

Now I'm not saying that's what's going on here, but you need a little better imagination.

I considered that actually, than disregarded it. They have no reason to target civilians only, as well as the already low civillian death rate would be further proof they are not targeting civilians.

Maybe that's a bad example, but they could be up to something they don't want a lot of people to see...

I actually think it was not intentional, but I also think it could have been avoided. Israel seems to have a history of being none too careful when it comes to the use of force, if random people end up dead, that's not their problem.

 

[RichardE]

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE


So now you change your argument? 😕 I am just going to put it off to maybe lack of sleep or a long day, today you are really off of it.

Yup go cry yourself to sleep. Please explain how my argument changed at all. The attack was deliberate as Kofi annan claimed and it wasn't an accident. The bombs didn't go off couse and hit the U.N force.

UN outpost, not a UN force..


The UN was warned about being in a warzone...

Discarding even that information, why would Israel purposely target a UN outpost? You need to practice some analytical thinking here and try to think this through.

Never said they would target it.

Israel gets about the same benifit from targeting the UN as they have with rest of this pointless war where they have accomplished nothing as they do targeting anything else.

You said it was deliberate...

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE


So now you change your argument? 😕 I am just going to put it off to maybe lack of sleep or a long day, today you are really off of it.

Yup go cry yourself to sleep. Please explain how my argument changed at all. The attack was deliberate as Kofi annan claimed and it wasn't an accident. The bombs didn't go off couse and hit the U.N force.

So yeah, deliberate = they targetted it...so you did say that.

 

[BrownTown]

He said they deliberately targeted the post which based on news reports seems to be correct. The question is whether or not they though it was being used by Hezbollah, or knew UN people were still inside.

 

[RichardE]

Originally posted by: BrownTown
He said they deliberately targeted the post which based on news reports seems to be correct. The question is whether or not they though it was being used by Hezbollah, or knew UN people were still inside.

That is the point I made earlier. It is more likely Hez misfeed information to Israeli innformants to get them to attack. This would benefit Hez immensely obviously, and as we can see would create more distate for Israel. I have no doubt the majority of these attacks that Israel is doing, which seem to be in extremly bad judgement are the result of misinformationg being fed to them.

 

[smack Down]

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE


So now you change your argument? 😕 I am just going to put it off to maybe lack of sleep or a long day, today you are really off of it.

Yup go cry yourself to sleep. Please explain how my argument changed at all. The attack was deliberate as Kofi annan claimed and it wasn't an accident. The bombs didn't go off couse and hit the U.N force.

UN outpost, not a UN force..


The UN was warned about being in a warzone...

Discarding even that information, why would Israel purposely target a UN outpost? You need to practice some analytical thinking here and try to think this through.

Never said they would target it.

Israel gets about the same benifit from targeting the UN as they have with rest of this pointless war where they have accomplished nothing as they do targeting anything else.

You said it was deliberate...

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE


So now you change your argument? 😕 I am just going to put it off to maybe lack of sleep or a long day, today you are really off of it.

Yup go cry yourself to sleep. Please explain how my argument changed at all. The attack was deliberate as Kofi annan claimed and it wasn't an accident. The bombs didn't go off couse and hit the U.N force.

So yeah, deliberate = they targetted it...so you did say that.

The orginal quote was

"U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan said he was "deeply distressed" by the "apparently deliberate" strike.

The strike which is what I agreed with. The strike was deliberate it may have been because of bad intelligence but it was deliberate.

Sorry you lose again.

oh PS I'm still wait for you to tell me where all those refugees came from in that other theard.

 

[RichardE]

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE


So now you change your argument? 😕 I am just going to put it off to maybe lack of sleep or a long day, today you are really off of it.

Yup go cry yourself to sleep. Please explain how my argument changed at all. The attack was deliberate as Kofi annan claimed and it wasn't an accident. The bombs didn't go off couse and hit the U.N force.

UN outpost, not a UN force..


The UN was warned about being in a warzone...

Discarding even that information, why would Israel purposely target a UN outpost? You need to practice some analytical thinking here and try to think this through.

Never said they would target it.

Israel gets about the same benifit from targeting the UN as they have with rest of this pointless war where they have accomplished nothing as they do targeting anything else.

You said it was deliberate...

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE


So now you change your argument? 😕 I am just going to put it off to maybe lack of sleep or a long day, today you are really off of it.

Yup go cry yourself to sleep. Please explain how my argument changed at all. The attack was deliberate as Kofi annan claimed and it wasn't an accident. The bombs didn't go off couse and hit the U.N force.

So yeah, deliberate = they targetted it...so you did say that.

The orginal quote was

"U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan said he was "deeply distressed" by the "apparently deliberate" strike.

The strike which is what I agreed with. The strike was deliberate it may have been because of bad intelligence but it was deliberate.

Sorry you lose again.

oh PS I'm still wait for you to tell me where all those refugees came from in that other theard.

So from your point of view...


They deliberatly struck the UN outpost without targeting it.?


oh wait..you did say they targeted it..

5 jets hit the same target because the jets where target the same target.

Yes it is.

 

[smack Down]

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE


So now you change your argument? 😕 I am just going to put it off to maybe lack of sleep or a long day, today you are really off of it.

Yup go cry yourself to sleep. Please explain how my argument changed at all. The attack was deliberate as Kofi annan claimed and it wasn't an accident. The bombs didn't go off couse and hit the U.N force.

UN outpost, not a UN force..


The UN was warned about being in a warzone...

Discarding even that information, why would Israel purposely target a UN outpost? You need to practice some analytical thinking here and try to think this through.

Never said they would target it.

Israel gets about the same benifit from targeting the UN as they have with rest of this pointless war where they have accomplished nothing as they do targeting anything else.

You said it was deliberate...

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE


So now you change your argument? 😕 I am just going to put it off to maybe lack of sleep or a long day, today you are really off of it.

Yup go cry yourself to sleep. Please explain how my argument changed at all. The attack was deliberate as Kofi annan claimed and it wasn't an accident. The bombs didn't go off couse and hit the U.N force.

So yeah, deliberate = they targetted it...so you did say that.

The orginal quote was

"U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan said he was "deeply distressed" by the "apparently deliberate" strike.

The strike which is what I agreed with. The strike was deliberate it may have been because of bad intelligence but it was deliberate.

Sorry you lose again.

oh PS I'm still wait for you to tell me where all those refugees came from in that other theard.

So from your point of view...


They deliberatly struck the UN outpost without targeting it.?


oh wait..you did say they targeted it..

5 jets hit the same target because the jets where target the same target.

Yes it is.

Is that really the best you can do to troll?

 

[BrownTown]

you people are aguing symantics, you are both "right" in what you are saying based on your interpretation of the word "deliberate". You both understand what happened and any discussion on whos origional statement was correct is meaningless due to the fact that both were correct given how you defined "deliberate", can we move past this now?

 

[RichardE]

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE


So now you change your argument? 😕 I am just going to put it off to maybe lack of sleep or a long day, today you are really off of it.

Yup go cry yourself to sleep. Please explain how my argument changed at all. The attack was deliberate as Kofi annan claimed and it wasn't an accident. The bombs didn't go off couse and hit the U.N force.

UN outpost, not a UN force..


The UN was warned about being in a warzone...

Discarding even that information, why would Israel purposely target a UN outpost? You need to practice some analytical thinking here and try to think this through.

Never said they would target it.

Israel gets about the same benifit from targeting the UN as they have with rest of this pointless war where they have accomplished nothing as they do targeting anything else.

You said it was deliberate...

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE


So now you change your argument? 😕 I am just going to put it off to maybe lack of sleep or a long day, today you are really off of it.

Yup go cry yourself to sleep. Please explain how my argument changed at all. The attack was deliberate as Kofi annan claimed and it wasn't an accident. The bombs didn't go off couse and hit the U.N force.

So yeah, deliberate = they targetted it...so you did say that.

The orginal quote was

"U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan said he was "deeply distressed" by the "apparently deliberate" strike.

The strike which is what I agreed with. The strike was deliberate it may have been because of bad intelligence but it was deliberate.

Sorry you lose again.

oh PS I'm still wait for you to tell me where all those refugees came from in that other theard.

So from your point of view...


They deliberatly struck the UN outpost without targeting it.?


oh wait..you did say they targeted it..

5 jets hit the same target because the jets where target the same target.

Yes it is.

Is that really the best you can do to troll?

Troll? I prove you wrong, than prove you are making crap up, than show your theory to be dumb, than show that you lie, and I'm the troll? You are a moron who dismisses history, claiming it doesn't matter, than use it when it is convinient, you comment on issues you have no idea about and lack any common sense on this issue not to mention the fact you lack the mental ability to digest information given to you. You jump blindly onto a bangwagon with no idea why you are, except its the one that everyone else is on, so should be the easiest to defend. Than you come here and try to make arguments without any knowledge and look like an idiot, and when you are called out, you change your story, or claim you never said something. I am not a troll smack down, I can back up any argument I make, you on the other hand disapere as soon as you called on what you say. You need to get educated, learn the history of an argument before trying to engage in a conversation about it. You probally have a specialty somewhere, but history is not even a medicore point within you. You also seriously need to learn how to look at a subject and consider all points of it before deciding your position. You are ignorant of this entire topic Smack Down.

 

[smack Down]

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE


So now you change your argument? 😕 I am just going to put it off to maybe lack of sleep or a long day, today you are really off of it.

Yup go cry yourself to sleep. Please explain how my argument changed at all. The attack was deliberate as Kofi annan claimed and it wasn't an accident. The bombs didn't go off couse and hit the U.N force.

UN outpost, not a UN force..


The UN was warned about being in a warzone...

Discarding even that information, why would Israel purposely target a UN outpost? You need to practice some analytical thinking here and try to think this through.

Never said they would target it.

Israel gets about the same benifit from targeting the UN as they have with rest of this pointless war where they have accomplished nothing as they do targeting anything else.

You said it was deliberate...

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE


So now you change your argument? 😕 I am just going to put it off to maybe lack of sleep or a long day, today you are really off of it.

Yup go cry yourself to sleep. Please explain how my argument changed at all. The attack was deliberate as Kofi annan claimed and it wasn't an accident. The bombs didn't go off couse and hit the U.N force.

So yeah, deliberate = they targetted it...so you did say that.

The orginal quote was

"U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan said he was "deeply distressed" by the "apparently deliberate" strike.

The strike which is what I agreed with. The strike was deliberate it may have been because of bad intelligence but it was deliberate.

Sorry you lose again.

oh PS I'm still wait for you to tell me where all those refugees came from in that other theard.

So from your point of view...


They deliberatly struck the UN outpost without targeting it.?


oh wait..you did say they targeted it..

5 jets hit the same target because the jets where target the same target.

Yes it is.

Is that really the best you can do to troll?

Troll? I prove you wrong, than prove you are making crap up, than show your theory to be dumb, than show that you lie, and I'm the troll? You are a moron who dismisses history, claiming it doesn't matter, than use it when it is convinient, you comment on issues you have no idea about and lack any common sense on this issue not to mention the fact you lack the mental ability to digest information given to you. You jump blindly onto a bangwagon with no idea why you are, except its the one that everyone else is on, so should be the easiest to defend. Than you come here and try to make arguments without any knowledge and look like an idiot, and when you are called out, you change your story, or claim you never said something. I am not a troll smack down, I can back up any argument I make, you on the other hand disapere as soon as you called on what you say. You need to get educated, learn the history of an argument before trying to engage in a conversation about it. You probally have a specialty somewhere, but history is not even a medicore point within you. You also seriously need to learn how to look at a subject and consider all points of it before deciding your position. You are ignorant of this entire topic Smack Down.

Now there at least you put some effort into that troll.

 

[RichardE]

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE


So now you change your argument? 😕 I am just going to put it off to maybe lack of sleep or a long day, today you are really off of it.

Yup go cry yourself to sleep. Please explain how my argument changed at all. The attack was deliberate as Kofi annan claimed and it wasn't an accident. The bombs didn't go off couse and hit the U.N force.

UN outpost, not a UN force..


The UN was warned about being in a warzone...

Discarding even that information, why would Israel purposely target a UN outpost? You need to practice some analytical thinking here and try to think this through.

Never said they would target it.

Israel gets about the same benifit from targeting the UN as they have with rest of this pointless war where they have accomplished nothing as they do targeting anything else.

You said it was deliberate...

Originally posted by: smack Down

Originally posted by: RichardE


So now you change your argument? 😕 I am just going to put it off to maybe lack of sleep or a long day, today you are really off of it.

Yup go cry yourself to sleep. Please explain how my argument changed at all. The attack was deliberate as Kofi annan claimed and it wasn't an accident. The bombs didn't go off couse and hit the U.N force.

So yeah, deliberate = they targetted it...so you did say that.

The orginal quote was

"U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan said he was "deeply distressed" by the "apparently deliberate" strike.

The strike which is what I agreed with. The strike was deliberate it may have been because of bad intelligence but it was deliberate.

Sorry you lose again.

oh PS I'm still wait for you to tell me where all those refugees came from in that other theard.

So from your point of view...


They deliberatly struck the UN outpost without targeting it.?


oh wait..you did say they targeted it..

5 jets hit the same target because the jets where target the same target.

Yes it is.

Is that really the best you can do to troll?

Troll? I prove you wrong, than prove you are making crap up, than show your theory to be dumb, than show that you lie, and I'm the troll? You are a moron who dismisses history, claiming it doesn't matter, than use it when it is convinient, you comment on issues you have no idea about and lack any common sense on this issue not to mention the fact you lack the mental ability to digest information given to you. You jump blindly onto a bangwagon with no idea why you are, except its the one that everyone else is on, so should be the easiest to defend. Than you come here and try to make arguments without any knowledge and look like an idiot, and when you are called out, you change your story, or claim you never said something. I am not a troll smack down, I can back up any argument I make, you on the other hand disapere as soon as you called on what you say. You need to get educated, learn the history of an argument before trying to engage in a conversation about it. You probally have a specialty somewhere, but history is not even a medicore point within you. You also seriously need to learn how to look at a subject and consider all points of it before deciding your position. You are ignorant of this entire topic Smack Down.

Now there at least you put some effort into that troll.

You are an idiot, plain and simple. I am going to ignore you now, you have no real arguments and anything you say only contributes to your overall ignorant image. Again, I am waiting on your response to why history doesn't matter, something you continuesly use in the land, yet history matters for everything else. You have to be one of the most ignroat, foolish members on P&N. So Smack Down, when does history matter?