This thread needs locked, thanks to the usual thread capper it's totally off topic.
Maybe it isn't, but if so we need to be consistent. Close down our military bases, bring all our troops home, stop spying, just lock down our borders and stick to ourselves. If this isn't our fight, then nothing is our fight until it arrives on our shores or everyone agrees it's the next world war. I'm okay either way, but for fuck's sake let's pick a lane and stay in it.
How about you go in first, since you are so eager to send thousands more of our kids to their deaths?The people under control of ISIS are all slaves.
The nature of slavery is abuse, and disposal.
It is the very reason I call for the organized extermination of ISIS via military force.
It's sad that the Islamphobes start to do their thing in every Daesh thread, maybe you could give me a hand in trying to set them straight
How about you go in first, since you are so eager to send thousands more of our kids to their deaths?
The neocon dreams of some liberal democratic enclave in the ME is bullshit, and certainly won't be built by our bombs. There is no winning there, just making things shitty in a different way.
Ok, let's continue playing your game.
Please quote the specific islamphobic statement that made you feel the need to make your post and set things straight.
Thread is about ISIS aka daesh, and you are trying to set things straight, so quoting the islamophobic statement should be easy.
These are your rules that I quoted and are using. Calling out ISIS for what they are isn't an example of islamophobic hysteria either.
Pretty sure this thread is about ISIS; never miss your chance to take a shot at the US or deflect from Islam do you?
Religion of peace?
So people keep saying. Ignore the evidence, just Listen and Believe.
(Everyone should look up "taqiyya".)
These are aimed at Islam not Daesh
Do you want me to look up other quotes from the same posters ?
No, I want you to quote the exact islamophobic statement that prompted your U.S. - ISIS equivocation. You said you make these kind of remarks in hopes of setting things straight.
There was only 3 posts in the thread before you made the remarks in post #4. Two of the three were authored by me even.
So it should be easy to quote the islamophobic portion that gives you cause to make your comments that are in question.
Like I said before, and posted examples of, I've often posted about the human trafficking problem in the US.
I guess I should not of brought up Americans involved in the sexual slavery trade in your Daesh sexual slavery thread
It upsets too many people
You said you do this when Islamophobic statements are made, what did I say that was islamophobic?
Like I said before, and posted examples of, I've often posted about the human trafficking problem in the US.
I guess I should not of brought up Americans involved in the sexual slavery trade in your Daesh sexual slavery thread
It upsets too many people
You brought up something totally irrelevant. You think Canada and Europe don't have human trafficking. Their is a huge difference in the human trafficking that ISIS promotes and illegal trafficking in the west
Can you show me where I said this?
Either it was in a different thread, in an edited post, or completely a figment of my imagination. Didn't you recently say something to the effect of making the posts many take exception with to show the behavior in question isn't unique to Muslims and expose islamophobic thinking?
If I did attribute this falsely to you I sincerely apologize, that wasn't my intention.
Besides you could clarify all of this by telling us why you continuously make equivocating posts when you read what you consider to be islamophobic thinking. An example of this world be post #4 in tho thread, which I believe is your first post of this thread.
Why did you feel the need to mention human trafficking in the U.S. and suggest it equal to the behavior I mentioned in my OP?
I am genuinely interested.
I know it really bothers people when I point to our own backyard
Besides you could clarify all of this by telling us why you continuously make equivocating posts when you read what you consider to be islamophobic thinking. An example of this world be post #4 in tho thread, which I believe is your first post of this thread.
Why did you feel the need to mention human trafficking in the U.S. and suggest it equal to the behavior I mentioned in my OP?
I'm sure you see some value in allowing them to establish their state while attacking their feelings. Personally I don't see it. Pretending to ignore their Islamic fundamentalist nature may make a lot of people feel better about themselves but it is not worth much to those people forced to live under their rule."That new name is Daesh. If you've followed coverage of this attempted official linguistic sea change, you'll have gathered that the new name, although its just an Arabic acronym equivalent to the English 'ISIS', apparently delegitimises the organisation, mocks them, and thus drives them to threaten taking violent retribution on anyone who uses it."
...
the use of this word is part of a multi-pronged, diverse range of efforts by Arabs and Muslims to reject the terrorists linguistic posturing, their pseudo-classical use of Arabic, their claims to Quranic authority and an absolute foundation in sacred scripture, as reflected in their pompous name
https://www.freewordcentre.com/blog/2015/02/daesh-isis-media-alice-guthrie/
Ain't nothing in the middle of the road but dead skunks. Although I am satisfied with Obama's strategy (to the degree he has a strategy) as whether by design or default, he is forcing the neighboring states to shoulder the bulk of their own defense, as is proper.Bit hyperbolic eh? I think there is a middle part between re-invading Iraq/Syria and turtling-up.
As said above, no one else is lining up to take another run at the briar patch. So many of them are more impacted than we are, but do nothing overly aggressive. So why us?
Boko Haram, al shabab, Mexican drug cartels, Kony, list goes on and on where bad shit is going on, humans are being abused/enslaved/murdered, and we aren't going to move in. Why Syria?
You get past the tear jerking stories and bravado of conquest, and you hear nothing of a plan of how we actually achieve any better state.
The neocon dreams of some liberal democratic enclave in the ME is bullshit, and certainly won't be built by our bombs. There is no winning there, just making things shitty in a different way.
lol I am not being willfully blind, I am rejecting the value of political correctness in fighting a war for the future of civilization. Hint: refusing to call the Third Reich National Socialists would not have kept them out of France.'Daesh' adopted as new name for ISIS by U.S., France
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/daesh-adopted-as-new-name-for-isis-by-u-s-france-1.2861108
Hopefully now you won't choose to be willfully blind, but I doubt it
You could always ignore me like a lot of Islamphobes do
Well said, sir.The injury that dq'ed me from the military while in ROTC eats at me now more than ever. I'd love to take point and assist the Kurdish people in their fight against ISIS.
And I'd be a prolific uploader of kill shots and enjoy trolling the hell out of the bastards while it lasted.
I couldn't think of any more righteous path than turning those pedophile assholes into pink martyr paste. To be the tip of God's avenging spear would be incredibly fulfilling and I don't even believe in God(s). If you've ever witnessed the sheer terror in the children's faces up top Mt. Sinjar as they witnessed wholesale slaughter of parents and villages in addition to being surrounded by ISIS and still not favor the extermination of ISIS because they weren't "our people" one must be dead inside.
Recruiters talked me out of enlisting right out of high school and instead do the college/ROTC route. Had I not listened the injury never would have happened but that's life.
Still talk is cheap, especially in an internet forum, so I do understand your point. However the military is supposed to be under civilian control ultimately and not having a personal stake shouldn't preclude one from being able to give opinion on the use of military force.
