Originally posted by: DrZoidberg
just because 6800gs has 12 pipes doesnt mean its slower than 6800gt. Look at the x1800xt with 16 pipes. Is x1800xt slower than 7800gt because it has 4 less pipes? Didnt ATI prove that clock speed can make up for less pipes?
That is exactly the case with the 6800GS. Nvidia need a card in this price-range of the market to compete with the X1300 or X1600 (I can't remember which), and since they already have the shader model 3.0 angle covered, they didn't really need to make a new variation on the G70 core just do fill this gap.
With the 6800GT becoming older tech, less popular, less available and quickly rising in price, disabling a few pipelines and ramping up the clock speeds on a fully-capable core opens an opportunity for them to save money for both themselves and the consumer. It's good marketting, and that is coming from an ATi user.
Currently, the only real threat to the 6800GS is the X800 GTO², but thanks to lack of SM3.0 support, PureVideo, and it being a limited edition, it won't be a threat for long. Once ATi introduces the X1300/X1600 (whichever it is in this price-range), they're going to have a very tough time convincing people not to buy a 6800GS.