Originally posted by: jonks
No one can know everything, because one nugget of info such a person would have would be that there are some things which are unknowable, thus negating the possibility of omniscience.
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: jonks
No one can know everything, because one nugget of info such a person would have would be that there are some things which are unknowable, thus negating the possibility of omniscience.
...what?
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: jonks
No one can know everything, because one nugget of info such a person would have would be that there are some things which are unknowable, thus negating the possibility of omniscience.
...what?
It's the paradox of omniscience. Similar to the paradox of omnipotence. i.e. if god can do anything, can he create a rock so heavy he can't lift it?
1 - if he can do anything, then he can create such a rock
2 - but if he can do anything, he can lift any rock no matter how heavy, but that means he cannot in fact create a rock so heavy he can't lift it
3 - rinse, repeat
i.e.i.e. unstoppable force meets unmovable object
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Since there are things which are fundamentally chaotic, no.
You cannot in principle know the future state of a subatomic particle. Where will an electron be at any given point in time? It's impossible to know even in principle. Now you can talk about probabilities of events, but that's it.