Okay now I'm on a proper computer. I certainly wouldn't want to give the impression that I am some authority on this or that I should be blindly believed. I really encourage everyone to take the time to listen to this interview I was talking about earlier:
http://valdostatoday.com/2013/10/touchton-says-kj-death-accidental/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTLTB8umoZ8
I just found what she had to say pretty compelling because she was a heavy hitter in the Valdosta "social justice/diversity" community. A community I personally have just about zero respect for, but the fact that someone prominent within it was able to see what appears to be the hard truth on this matter, carries weight with me. Because they'd have every reason not to.
She was apparently pretty involved in the early rallies, and it would appear she started out on the other side of this issue. She seems to have been invited by the law enforcement, as well as the SPLC, to be the liaison between the two camps, or something like that, and be exposed directly to all the involved investigators, all the information, etc.
I think the investigating bodies viewed her somewhat as someone they could show everything, be open and honest with, and that she could go back to her community as an ambassador of the truth. Which seems to be exactly what she's doing.
I'm not just making an appeal to her authority. She provides good, logical reasons to favor her conclusion that it was a tragic accident.
She makes a good case that the police have not been anywhere near as obstructionist or cryptic with the family as the family would have us believe.
I think the investigation was not perfect, but was completely adequate and reached the right conclusion. It just wasn't a conclusion the parents could accept easily, which I can understand. And it wasn't a conclusion Ben Crump and Shaveen King could make money off of.