Is the i3 processors usable for another 6 years ?

Discussion in 'CPUs and Overclocking' started by spiketide, Nov 6, 2012.

  1. SlowSpyder

    SlowSpyder Lifer

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    Messages:
    10,133
    Likes Received:
    4

    You bash the AMD processors every chance you get, we get it, you do not like AMD chps. The OP was asking about an i3, that to me would suggest his budget is limited. And as great of IPC as Intel chips have, I see a six core chip that can be overclocked faring better some years from now, and especially five to six years from now (though I think either would be pretty slow). Obviously an i7 has a much better chance of being usable, but given the low end parts the OP is asking about, I don't think he is looking to spend that much. At the ~$130 price point, I would buy the FX6300, it wouldn't be a tough decision for me.
     
  2. grimpr

    grimpr Golden Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    Messages:
    1,073
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Core i3's lost their reason to exist, condensed between the A10/A8 Trinitys and the FX 6300, total devastation.
     
  3. RU482

    RU482 Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2000
    Messages:
    12,681
    Likes Received:
    0
    if you're planning for 6 years, pick up some extra cans on the side of the road and splurge on an i5
     
  4. Rvenger

    Rvenger Elite Member <br> Super Moderator <br> Video Cards
    Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2004
    Messages:
    6,292
    Likes Received:
    4

    And the future brings single and dual core gaming. :rolleyes:
     
  5. Dark Shroud

    Dark Shroud Golden Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,576
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why don't you go back and read the OP's situation. The OP cannot get an i5 or i7.

    It's against a Core i3 where the A10 isn't far behind and has a lot more features. Not to mention the A10 over clocks very easily.

    Its going to become common for games to use 4 threads in the next two years or so. AMD chips have much longer viability options here with more cores and/or upgrade paths to the next architecture.

    I get that you're one of the many here who doesn't like AMD and puts them down when ever you can. But you need to stop giving wrong to impossible advice.
     
  6. tweakboy

    tweakboy Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    Messages:
    9,498
    Likes Received:
    1
    What do you plan on doing with this PC.

    If you plan on playing games with that 9500 GT its not going to get the job done. If you buy a i3 then say 3 years later you decide to buy a new video card then your performance is going to be slow and you will have a CPU bottleneck.

    The config doesn't even cut it for today, let alone 6 years. You want something to last 6 years you have to look at Ivy or Sandy. But whats the point of getting that when your video card is a dud. You should grab a 460 1GB for 120 dollars when you can and if you don't have money for i7 get a i5 35xxk ivy processor. Your games will fly and so will desktop stuff. But 6 years is asking too much. Well be on Windows 10 by then. Your i3 probably wont be supported with that OS, just kidding,,, inside humor. anyhow gl
     
  7. frozentundra123456

    frozentundra123456 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    8,987
    Likes Received:
    18
    Actually the OP didnt mention AMD either. The AMD fans are the ones who started talking about the FX. To be fair, the FX6300 is probably better than the i3 if you are willing to overclock and dont mind higher power usage. I do think there are games such as Skyrim and Starcraft 2 though in which the i3 would still be faster.

    However, if one wants to spend the money to be into PC gaming, and wants a future proof system, getting an i5 or i7 is definitely worth the money. You can get a i5 for 60.00 more based on New Egg prices. Spread out over even only 3 years, that is only 20.00 per year, not counting the power savings compared to an overclocked FX.
     
  8. frozentundra123456

    frozentundra123456 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    8,987
    Likes Received:
    18
    There are also just as many who incessantly promote AMD as the best solution when it is clearly not. And what impossible advice am I giving? I will not speak to the OPs financial situation, but if one can afford to buy even a few games a year, they can afford the price difference between an i3/FX and an i5.

    And are you saying that I am wrong that a quad intel is better for almost every game than any AMD processor?? If AMD fans can jump in and suggest an FX, I have just as much right to suggest that the OP somehow come up with the money for an i5.
     
  9. VirtualLarry

    VirtualLarry Lifer

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2001
    Messages:
    33,337
    Likes Received:
    26
    I agree that software requirements (other than 1080P video playback, which is handled nicely by IGPs nowadays) haven't really increased much.

    However, I think Intel would beg to disagree with you that CPUs have stopped getting faster. Haswell should be a significant step forward in computing power for your dollar.
     
  10. frozentundra123456

    frozentundra123456 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    8,987
    Likes Received:
    18
    You want to talk about future gaming, look at the crysis 3 CPU benches in the video forum. Even if you add 15% for vishera vs BD, any Intel quad is clearly ahead. I am not advocating i3. I am saying that if you are spending the money to build a gaming PC and buy games, find a way to get at least an i5, especially if you want the PC to last several years.
     
  11. AtenRa

    AtenRa Lifer

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    11,258
    Likes Received:
    41
    At the same price as i3 the FX6300 will last you longer.

    I dont know what is your current CPU but replacing your GPU should be your first priority. For a cheap upgrade, the A10-5800K will make you upgrade both your CPU and GPU at the same time for the same price as an i3.
    Judging by the 9500GT you have used until now, i will say that you will be fine with the iGPU of the A10-5800K for at least 3 years in lower resolutions(720p).
     
  12. Insert_Nickname

    Insert_Nickname Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    2,620
    Likes Received:
    2
    The 5800K gets my vote too. Great little chip for cheap gaming. Alternatively an upgrade to an HD7750/70 is not a bad idea either, depending on the OPs current config you might even be able to fit a HD7850 in there.

    Look at this table. Then remember the 8800GT has almost four times the performance of the 8600GT/9500GT... its not even funny...
     
  13. Durvelle27

    Durvelle27 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2012
    Messages:
    4,102
    Likes Received:
    0
    First Off those are bulldozer and we all know they under perform but Vishera will more than likely deliver what we want even if it not as quit as high as a i7 or something
     
  14. SlowSpyder

    SlowSpyder Lifer

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    Messages:
    10,133
    Likes Received:
    4

    He asked if the i3 would be good for six years. Short answer, no. In that price range the FX 6300 would likely be a much better processor, though I have my doubts of how good it will be six years out, too. But I think it'll do better than a HT'd dual core would, down the road. It is in the same price range, that is why I suggested it.

    And my guess is the power use will only matter if he games a LOT, and maybe not even then. Chances are during gaming the FX 6300 will use nowhere near its peak consumption as there will likely be cores idle. The i3 on the other hand will be very busy on both cores.

    *edit - Of course if he's using a 9500GT, none of this matters, he could have a 5GHz i7 Ivy and still have a bad gaming experience. :)
     
    #39 SlowSpyder, Nov 7, 2012
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2012
  15. Ketchup

    Ketchup Lifer

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2002
    Messages:
    12,491
    Likes Received:
    1
    First off, the bad news. Your question is impossible to answer. We don't know what you (or I) will be doing in 6 years, we don't know where software will be in 6 years, and we don't know where processors will be in to years.

    Now, the good news. 6 years is not as long than it used to be. Remember when after having hardware for 2 years it felt like crap? It ain't that way any more. I repair people's computers on the side. These people are running Pentium 4's, and delighted with the speed of their computers after cleaning out the crap (viruses and junk in general) and doing a simple defrag. Let alone (gasp!) adding memory.

    Build what you can with the money you have. You can get a video card, SSD, more memory later. Easy additions. Center you money around the CPU. Right now, Intel is where it's at, IMO.
     
  16. RaistlinZ

    RaistlinZ Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2001
    Messages:
    7,575
    Likes Received:
    0
    6 years from now your smartphone will be 100x more powerful than that i3.

    So, no.
     
  17. lehtv

    lehtv Lifer

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2010
    Messages:
    11,508
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's a bit of an exaggeration.
     
  18. Rvenger

    Rvenger Elite Member <br> Super Moderator <br> Video Cards
    Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2004
    Messages:
    6,292
    Likes Received:
    4

    I hear that its the HT link that is affecting the performance of the PCI-E bandwidth on AMD setups and not just the CPU itself.
     
  19. AtenRa

    AtenRa Lifer

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    11,258
    Likes Received:
    41
    Could you be more specific about that ?? any links ??? first time i hear about that.
     
  20. DDR4

    DDR4 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2012
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    If you're seriously thinking about an i3, you should probably go for AMD at that level. Their procs are better at that price point as compared to Intel's i3.