Is the i3 processors usable for another 6 years ?

Discussion in 'CPUs and Overclocking' started by spiketide, Nov 6, 2012.

  1. spiketide

    spiketide Junior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello,
    Hi I am planning to build a medium level gaming rig that can play atleast Crysis 1/Assasins Creed Brotherhood (You get the idea), on a very tight budget.

    After much research based on performance and cost (cost, mainly!), I have rounded upon
    CPU : i3 - 3220 3.3 Ghz
    Mobo : DH61ZE / DH67BL (Please say which combo will be better)

    I already have a 9500 GT graphics card.

    So how does this config sound?

    Also, how long do you all think it will take for the i3 processors to get outdated?

    Thanks for sharing your inputs.

    ==============================================================================
    *EDIT*
    ==============================================================================

    Thanks for all of your inputs.
    So, for a serious gaming rig, I should get atleast an i5 with a better Graphics Card.
    I used to be an avid gamer, but sadly I don't find the time these days. Also, my current mobo got fried and I can't expand my budget as of now. So I guess, for now all I need is a rig to play games that were released till now (or an year or two earlier).
    May be a year later I can save up and get a proper gaming PC.
    So, now do you think that an i3 is a suitable (and cheap) option for me to buy right now?
     
    #1 spiketide, Nov 6, 2012
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2012
  2. SlowSpyder

    SlowSpyder Lifer

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    Messages:
    10,133
    Likes Received:
    4
    I don't believe an i3 would be a good choice for a CPU for another six years. It is already a lower end part, six years is an eternity in the computer world. And a 9500GT isn't exactly a current power house, it wasn't a powerful part when it was released years ago.

    I'd look at an AMD FX6300 before an i3. Otherwise I would suggest you keep saving your spare change until you can get an i5 and a better graphics card.

    Just my $.02.

    *edit - For the games you mentioned, an i3 is probably ok, though I still think the 9500GT is on the light side. And certainly will be almost useless in six years time, probably well before.
     
  3. BD231

    BD231 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2001
    Messages:
    9,754
    Likes Received:
    1
    A 2500k would go a lot further and you *should* be able to find one pretty cheap. I wouldn't go anything less than four cores if you plan on playing future games though, you'll get a lot more time out of a cpu you can OC properly.

    Dual cores ARE already outdated so, something to consider.
     
  4. 2is

    2is Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2012
    Messages:
    3,963
    Likes Received:
    9
    If you're going to play the same gaes 6 years down the line, sure. Otherwise, no
     
  5. Insert_Nickname

    Insert_Nickname Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    2,616
    Likes Received:
    2
    What kind of system are you currently using?. I would say you need a new graphics card before you need a new CPU/MB...

    The 9500GT is outdated...

    my 2c
     
  6. IntelEnthusiast

    IntelEnthusiast Intel Representative

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2011
    Messages:
    582
    Likes Received:
    0
    Would an Intel® Core™ i3 processor work for 6 years? Yes but it really comes down to what you are going to be doing with that system. If you are looking for something for Internet, email, or streaming a media you are fine but if you are looking for gaming system in which you might be playing current high end games, no it won't work that long.
     
  7. Jimzz

    Jimzz Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2012
    Messages:
    4,056
    Likes Received:
    1
    Yea I can see the AMD 6300 laster longer due to software in the future working better with quad+ than dual.

    So either get a quad/six core now or save up to get one.

    I think you can get 2-3 years out of a fast dual now depending on the games and also video card. But not 6 years IMO.
     
  8. Magic Carpet

    Magic Carpet Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2011
    Messages:
    3,099
    Likes Received:
    1
    6 years?

    An overclocked 3770K might still be adequate, who knows, not an i3 though.
     
  9. Derped

    Derped Junior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bad idea in my opinion, if you want something to age well then you can't buy from the bottom and expect it to last. My i7 920 is beginning its 5th year of duty and I think its still fine for my needs but it was the low end of the high end if that makes sense. It was $280. And I wouldn't buy anything AMD either, not just because of the slow performance but because of the high power usage. The extra money spent on power usage over six years might make the i5 3570k cheaper than something from AMD in the long run.
     
  10. Eureka

    Eureka Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2005
    Messages:
    3,828
    Likes Received:
    0
    Depends on what you mean by usable. My dual core rig is about 6 years old, it was using a budget Pentium Dual-Core back then. Nowadays it's basically a media pc, I can get online and watch stuff, and play the occasional low-end game. It will still run fine, but it won't be competitive in 6 years.
     
  11. aaksheytalwar

    aaksheytalwar Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,384
    Likes Received:
    0
    Short answer NO.
     
  12. frozentundra123456

    frozentundra123456 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    8,986
    Likes Received:
    18
    The i3 should be adequate for general use but not for gaming. I would definitely go for an i5, preferably an unlocked one. That said, the biggest weakness is the graphics card. That card is inadequate for current games, much less a few years down the road. You will need at least a HD 7850 or higher.
     
  13. Dark Shroud

    Dark Shroud Golden Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,576
    Likes Received:
    0
    Either the FX-6300 from AMD or go with an A10 & the FM2 socket that will get Steamroller CPU upgrade options.
     
  14. aaksheytalwar

    aaksheytalwar Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,384
    Likes Received:
    0
    No 6 year old gpu can run today's games leave alone a low end one.
     
  15. ShintaiDK

    ShintaiDK Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    20,071
    Likes Received:
    13
    Steamroller is currently completely missing from AMD roadmaps. And a second Pilediver CPU for FM2 inserted instead.
     
  16. frozentundra123456

    frozentundra123456 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    8,986
    Likes Received:
    18
    FX-6300 trades blows with i3 now unless overclocked, and is far behind any intel quad. A10 is even slower. If you want future proof, get an i5 or i7.
     
  17. SPBHM

    SPBHM Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2012
    Messages:
    4,003
    Likes Received:
    4
    8800GTX (and you can even use in SLI) and Core 2 Quad are 6 years old...
    and car run any game...


    as for the I3,
    I think it will be quite bad in 6 years time... it's a dual core CPU...

    oh, and the 9500GT is already quite slow, it's no faster than Intel HD4000.
     
  18. Zorander

    Zorander Golden Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2010
    Messages:
    1,117
    Likes Received:
    0
    I can't think of many, if any, 6-year-old computer component that is still capable of playing today's/latest games. On GPU alone, they are incapable of DX11 features and have limited VRAMs. Within 6 years, who knows how many cores are commonplace. Dual-core CPUs will probably be budget stuff or extinct by then.

    If you really want to keep your CPU for that long, an overclockable quad-core (i5/i7 K-series) is really what you need to buy. Anything less will just get outdated sooner no matter how you will against it.

    p.s. From personal experience, when I got my first dual-core in 2005 (A64 X2 3800+), I thought I would never need upgrade my CPU given my then normal activities of watching videos and web-browsing. By late 2008, 1080p videos rendered it impotent. Lesson learned: nothing lasts for long, esp. in the computer world.
     
    #18 Zorander, Nov 6, 2012
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2012
  19. OBLAMA2009

    OBLAMA2009 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,577
    Likes Received:
    1
    im sorry to say that probably will still be a usable machine 6 years from now. cpu's have more or less stopped getting faster and there really isnt any software that would make faster chips necessary.
     
  20. Durvelle27

    Durvelle27 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2012
    Messages:
    4,102
    Likes Received:
    0
    nope a dual core isn't going to cut it in 6 years as you can see alot of games being released are targeting quad cores
     
  21. kowalabearhugs

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2010
    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    0
    Oh? Please elaborate on why chips are not getting faster or how the bit depth / resolution of multimedia workloads is decreasing or stagnant.
     
  22. grimpr

    grimpr Golden Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    Messages:
    1,073
    Likes Received:
    0
    An AMD FX 6300 is a much better value proposition.
     
  23. Screech

    Screech Golden Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,186
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have an old computer with an athlon 64 3000+ (introduced at the end of 2003 I believe) that still runs......but isn't good for much more than checking email.
     
  24. frozentundra123456

    frozentundra123456 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    8,986
    Likes Received:
    18
    Compared to what?? AMDs worst area is gaming. Look at the posting for Crysis 3 in the Video Card forums. 8 core AMD FX cant even beat a 2 generation old intel quad. Fail to see how that is a good value. Cheap does not equal good value. Some people just can seem to accept that i5 or i7 is the best choice for gaming.
     
  25. grimpr

    grimpr Golden Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    Messages:
    1,073
    Likes Received:
    0
    Compared to the dualcore i3, simple as that.