Chavez's seizure of the press in Venezuala, and subsequent creation of a state run media, and his terror tactics against those that voted against him are definately anti-democracy but I believe the proof will be in the pudding when Chavez finishes his re-write of the venezulan constitution. I have no doubt, being a Castro follower, that it will contain provisions that he can assume absolute control of the country and eliminate elections. And when the oil money runs dry which I don't doubt is going to happen sooner, rather than later the country will fall to stagnation and he being the dictator he aspires to be will live in a state of wealth while the populous lives in abject poverty, just like Castro.
It was also interesting to me that after Boliva seized all the foreign investment in the country hurting their largest neighbor badly, that shortly thereafter and very low key it was announced that Venezuala would be taking over delivery and management of all the Bolivian fossil fuel resources. So in effect they kicked Brazil out and gave Venezuala control. Is that to the benefit to Boliva and south america in general?
It was also interesting to me that after Boliva seized all the foreign investment in the country hurting their largest neighbor badly, that shortly thereafter and very low key it was announced that Venezuala would be taking over delivery and management of all the Bolivian fossil fuel resources. So in effect they kicked Brazil out and gave Venezuala control. Is that to the benefit to Boliva and south america in general?