• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Is she guilty of something or not?

dud

dud

Diamond Member
She's guilty of something ...


I did a search on (Heath) Ledger and Olsen and came up with nothing so here it goes ...

"Mary-Kate Olsen wants immunity from prosecution before she will cooperate with a federal investigation into close friend Heath Ledger's accidental overdose death, PEOPLE has confirmed.

Investigators could subpoena the 22-year-old actress but hope to work this out, a law enforcement source said Monday.

Olsen's publicist and lawyer didn't immediately comment."



What could the troll have possibly done to want immunity? Perhaps she provided her "friend" Ledger with drugs that ultimately killed him?
 
Weren't they on opposite sides of the country when this happened? Given that scenario, it seems hard to believe that she would've supplied him with his drugs. But if she's asking for immunity it must be the case.
 
She probably was the one who got him the OxyContin that he OD'ed on. It was in his bloodstream, but no pill bottles were found at the apartment. She probably sent her bodyguards over there to grab the bottles before the cops arrived.
 
lol, so why would investigators grant her immunity request? It sounds like she has everything to lose and nothing to offer except some "truth".
 
Sharing drugs is what friends do.

She should get immunity.

If someone ODs on Tylenol, it will never be the manufacturers fault. Personal responsibility....
 
Originally posted by: RESmonkey
Wow. So it might wasn't suicide?
Click to expand...

No, there was Oxycontin found in his system that was obtained illegally. So the likely reason she wants immunity is that she either gave it to him or goes to the same source to get it.

Can't blame her for wanting to exercise her constitutional rights, really. I mean, if ATOT can get all fired up over a debate on whether showing a receipt should be a criminal action or not, surely we can see how she'd want to ensure that nobody probes too far into her life regardless of being guilty or not.

 
Originally posted by: apac
lol, so why would investigators grant her immunity request? It sounds like she has everything to lose and nothing to offer except some "truth".
Click to expand...

Because she has the constitutional right to keep her mouth shut if she thinks it will incriminate her.
 
Originally posted by: Eli
Sharing drugs is what friends do.

She should get immunity.

If someone ODs on Tylenol, it will never be the manufacturers fault. Personal responsibility....
Click to expand...

Er, like personal responsibility for giving someone else the drugs that killed them?
 
Originally posted by: Eli
Sharing drugs is what friends do.

She should get immunity.

If someone ODs on Tylenol, it will never be the manufacturers fault. Personal responsibility....
Click to expand...

No if she gave him prescription drugs without a prescription then she broke the law and the drugs she gave him could have been the ones that caused the fatal mix and killed him. It?s called manslaughter in that case.
 
Originally posted by: Eli
Sharing drugs is what friends do.

She should get immunity.

If someone ODs on Tylenol, it will never be the manufacturers fault. Personal responsibility....
Click to expand...

Your post makes little to no sense.
 
Originally posted by: Eli
Sharing drugs is what friends do.

She should get immunity.

If someone ODs on Tylenol, it will never be the manufacturers fault. Personal responsibility....
Click to expand...


You know ... this was supposed to be a SERIOUS thread!


I'm so glad that you chimed in ...
 
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: Eli
Sharing drugs is what friends do.

She should get immunity.

If someone ODs on Tylenol, it will never be the manufacturers fault. Personal responsibility....
Click to expand...

No if she gave him prescription drugs without a prescription then she broke the law and the drugs she gave him could have been the ones that caused the fatal mix and killed him. It?s called manslaughter in that case.
Click to expand...

I think it would only be manslaughter if she actually administered the drugs herself. Worst thing here I think would be negligence.

Analogy: Some idiot leaves a gun out, kid finds it, blows his head off. Not manslaughter. VS: Some idiot is playing with his gun and it goes off and blows his kid away. Manslaughter.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top