Is RedHat deliberately CRIPPLING Linux?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
So none of you guys have a clue what you are talking about,.... that's what I thought.

Odd, this thread seems to be about JohnBernstein's opinion on RH's software and yet as soon as other people disagree with his opinion they're idiots?
 

JohnBernstein

Banned
Mar 31, 2006
84
0
0
Originally posted by: Nothinman
So none of you guys have a clue what you are talking about,.... that's what I thought.
Odd, this thread seems to be about JohnBernstein's opinion on RH's software and yet as soon as other people disagree with his opinion they're idiots?
You turkeys cannot get away with that claim.
You (collectively) were the first to call names.
Besides many, if not most, of your arguments about Redhat, were,... just plain wrong,.... sort of indicating that you (collectively) didn't know what you were on about.
 

Bluestealth

Senior member
Jul 5, 2004
434
0
0
Originally posted by: JohnBernstein
Originally posted by: Nothinman
So none of you guys have a clue what you are talking about,.... that's what I thought.
Odd, this thread seems to be about JohnBernstein's opinion on RH's software and yet as soon as other people disagree with his opinion they're idiots?
You turkeys cannot get away with that claim.
You (collectively) were the first to call names.
Besides many, if not most, of your arguments about Redhat, were,... just plain wrong,.... sort of indicating that you (collectively) didn't know what you were on about.

Expecting people to support your opinion with facts, and calling everyone else idiots is fun :)
 

TonyRic

Golden Member
Nov 4, 1999
1,972
0
71
This guys is also missing one HUGE point here. Why should any company provide seamless access to a file system to another operating system? MS only provides NTFS and FAT32 support, not access to EXT2/3, ReiserFS, XFS, et al. NOR does MS provide you with the DVD codecs out of the box. I however, will give you the one thing that MS does do and provide you with MP3 codecs. But as has been stated before, why do you NEED this capability on a server? You want that, go get Fedora or one of the other many desktop distros that do not remove this functionality.
 

nweaver

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2001
6,813
1
0
Lets see some answers and supporting facts on YOUR opinion. I'll number them, so the are easier. Linking to your own web page doesn't count as "proof" of anything.


1. Redhat is owned by the music industry

2. MP3 support for servers is required functionality

3. support for NTFS is important for linux servers

4. DVD support is required functionality for servers
 

erikistired

Diamond Member
Sep 27, 2000
9,739
0
0
Originally posted by: JohnBernstein
So none of you guys have a clue what you are talking about,.... that's what I thought.

i don't even run linux, but i can clearly see you are a raving lunatic. what part of "red hat appeals to the server crowd" are you not understanding?
 

JohnBernstein

Banned
Mar 31, 2006
84
0
0
Originally posted by: fisher
i don't even run linux, but i can clearly see you are a raving lunatic. what part of "red hat appeals to the server crowd" are you not understanding?
What part of "servers do not need a graphics environment" are you not understanding,.... you raving lunatic.

As we all know, running a graphics environment is a security risk for a server.

Yet Redhat ships with a functional graphics environment.

I am sure they must be on the verge of removing it, so that your comment will make a minimal amount of sense.

Till then, it is just evidence that you haven't got a clue what you are talking about.

 

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
Originally posted by: JohnBernstein
Is RedHat deliberately CRIPPLING Linux?
1) they compiled out MP3 support.
3) they do not provide available Linux video editing software.
4) they do not provide available DVD support.
5) they do not provide a way for Linux to play movies (more generally, this is a problem for all of Linux).

Ubuntu doesn't offer any of these out of the box either. You need to go to the repositories for that, and often the multiverse.
 

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
As we all know, running a graphics environment is a security risk for a server.

Yet Redhat ships with a functional graphics environment.

I am sure they must be on the verge of removing it, so that your comment will make a minimal amount of sense.

But it's also a requirement for many things like Oracle, Orion, etc so there's no way they'll be removing it any time soon. And generally as long as X isn't listening on the network, and it doesn't by default, you'll be ok.

Till then, it is just evidence that you haven't got a clue what you are talking about.

You're the one raving about the MPAA, RIAA, RH crippling their software, etc without providing any proof so I'd say you're the one that needs beat with the cluebat.
 

erikistired

Diamond Member
Sep 27, 2000
9,739
0
0
Originally posted by: JohnBernstein
Originally posted by: fisher
i don't even run linux, but i can clearly see you are a raving lunatic. what part of "red hat appeals to the server crowd" are you not understanding?
What part of "servers do not need a graphics environment" are you not understanding,.... you raving lunatic.

As we all know, running a graphics environment is a security risk for a server.

Yet Redhat ships with a functional graphics environment.

I am sure they must be on the verge of removing it, so that your comment will make a minimal amount of sense.

Till then, it is just evidence that you haven't got a clue what you are talking about.

wow. i point out you are a raving lunatic so you call me a...raving lunatic. just wow.

sure redhat ships with a gui. do you have to install it? no. can it be useful? i dunno i don't run linux anymore and i haven't run a linux server. when i was running redhat it wasn't mandatory to install it. people have pointed out time and time again why your points are invalid and you just scream about totally unrelated things. at this point i'm guessing you're just trolling, but who knows, maybe YOU believe the crap you spew.
 

JohnBernstein

Banned
Mar 31, 2006
84
0
0
Originally posted by: fisher
wow. i point out you are a raving lunatic so you call me a...raving lunatic. just wow.
Just wow man. I call you a raving lunatic, because you are one,....

You admit that you have never run a server, yet pretend you know something about all this,....

You say: sure redhat ships with a gui. do you have to install it? no. can it be useful? i dunno,....

You use this to imply that running a GUI on a server, a known security risk, is not only OK, but desirable, because redhat caters for the server market.

Yet if I say the same thing for MP3's, you get all up tight,....

I say: sure redhat ships with MP3. do you have to install it? no. can it be useful? Of course it is useful. I can't work well unless listening to my MP3s,....

and claim that Redhat can't support MP3's because they cater for the server market......

Oh,.... but that's right: redhat doesn't ship with MP3 support,.....

Note, that you have said that Redhat should supply graphics support, because it is useful to many people, even though it is security risk on a server.

Note, that you have also said that Redhat should not supply MP3 support, even though it is useful to many people because Redhat is meant to be used as a server.

You have a serious disconnect in you thinking pal.
 

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
You use this to imply that running a GUI on a server, a known security risk, is not only OK, but desirable, because redhat caters for the server market.

Yet if I say the same thing for MP3's, you get all up tight,....

Point out a security problem with the default configuration of RH's X configuration, please.

I say: sure redhat ships with MP3. do you have to install it? no. can it be useful? Of course it is useful. I can't work well unless listening to my MP3s,....

Maybe it's just me, but when I work on a Linux server I do it from my workstation via ssh so even if the server could play MP3s it wouldn't matter because they'd be playing in the server room and I'm not there.
 

JohnBernstein

Banned
Mar 31, 2006
84
0
0
Originally posted by: Nothinman
Maybe it's just me, but when I work on a Linux server I do it from my workstation via ssh so even if the server could play MP3s it wouldn't matter because they'd be playing in the server room and I'm not there.
No **** Tonto.

Then why do you "logically challenged" folk insist that Redhat must ship with graphics support (and not MP3 support).

 

sigs3gv

Senior member
Oct 14, 2005
513
0
0
Originally posted by: JohnBernstein
Originally posted by: Nothinman
Maybe it's just me, but when I work on a Linux server I do it from my workstation via ssh so even if the server could play MP3s it wouldn't matter because they'd be playing in the server room and I'm not there.
No **** Tonto.

Then why do you "logically challenged" folk insist that Redhat must ship with graphics support (and not MP3 support).

Why would Redhat ship MP3 support on a server system?
There is no reason for them to do so. Servers are not placed on office desks for employees to work on. Servers are placed in data centers with other servers.
 

JohnBernstein

Banned
Mar 31, 2006
84
0
0
And, I would like Drag to justify his claims on cutting and pasting,....

Originally posted by: drag
What sort of credentials do you have other then a website that is a sub-par website that is little more then copy-paste from other people's websites?
Hey NOT **** TRUE

All of the Linux stuff is (essentially) original. Lots of ideas from other places of course, but not even close to cut and paste.

The closest to non-original are the Javascript movies which came from a few high quality 9/11 videos (of the collapse of the WTC buildings and the planes hitting the buildings etc) that are publicly available on the web --- but they were originally videos, not Javascript movies.

In fact the 9/11 videos came from this page

http://linux.coconia.net/gr/523.htm

which I had to salvage from Google as the original site "went missing".[/quote]
 

JohnBernstein

Banned
Mar 31, 2006
84
0
0
Provide the whole story pal,.........

Originally posted by: fisher
wow. i point out you are a raving lunatic so you call me a...raving lunatic. just wow.
Just wow man. I call you a raving lunatic, because you are one,....

You admit that you have never run a server, yet pretend you know something about all this,....

You say: sure redhat ships with a gui. do you have to install it? no. can it be useful? i dunno,....

You use this to imply that running a GUI on a server, a known security risk, is not only OK, but desirable, because redhat caters for the server market.

Yet if I say the same thing for MP3's, you get all up tight,....

I say: sure redhat ships with MP3. do you have to install it? no. can it be useful? Of course it is useful. I can't work well unless listening to my MP3s,....

and claim that Redhat can't support MP3's because they cater for the server market......

Oh,.... but that's right: redhat doesn't ship with MP3 support,.....

Note, that you have said that Redhat should supply graphics support, because it is useful to many people, even though it is security risk on a server.

Note, that you have also said that Redhat should not supply MP3 support, even though it is useful to many people because Redhat is meant to be used as a server.

You have a serious disconnect in you thinking pal.
 

JohnBernstein

Banned
Mar 31, 2006
84
0
0
Originally posted by: Markbnj
Ha. The jury is in, and the news isn't good for you.

Ohhhhhhhh man, don't ban fisher and all those who called me names,...... they are OK,...... really.

Originally posted by: fisher
wow. i point out you are a raving lunatic so you call me a...raving lunatic. just wow.

You people just don't know how to argue,... and get real upset when beaten fair and square.
 

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
Then why do you "logically challenged" folk insist that Redhat must ship with graphics support (and not MP3 support).

Because things like Oracle require it, are you even reading the posts here? It's impossible to install Oracle without X, therefore RedHat would be cutting of a significant portion of their business if they removed X. So logic dictates that RedHat should include and support X, by what logic should they include and support an MP3 decoder?

You people just don't know how to argue,... and get real upset when beaten fair and square.

Arguing seems to be the only thing you know how to do.

 

erikistired

Diamond Member
Sep 27, 2000
9,739
0
0
Originally posted by: JohnBernstein
Originally posted by: fisher
wow. i point out you are a raving lunatic so you call me a...raving lunatic. just wow.
Just wow man. I call you a raving lunatic, because you are one,....

You admit that you have never run a server, yet pretend you know something about all this,....

i haven't run a linux server. that doesn't mean squat because your arguements have no merit. i'm not pretending to know anything, it's pretty much common sense for everyone but you.

You say: sure redhat ships with a gui. do you have to install it? no. can it be useful? i dunno,....

You use this to imply that running a GUI on a server, a known security risk, is not only OK, but desirable, because redhat caters for the server market.

Yet if I say the same thing for MP3's, you get all up tight,....

i'm not implying anything. i'm not sure how you go from "you don't have to install the gui" to "you think it's desirable" but there you go. i'm not uptight about anything. i don't care one way or the other if red hat ships with mp3 support because 1) i'm not a retard and am capable of installing an mp3 player in linux and 2) i wouldn't use an mp3 player on a server. but then i'm able to distinguish a server OS from a workstation OS. of course i also live in reality and not fantasyland...

I say: sure redhat ships with MP3. do you have to install it? no. can it be useful? Of course it is useful. I can't work well unless listening to my MP3s,....

and claim that Redhat can't support MP3's because they cater for the server market......

Oh,.... but that's right: redhat doesn't ship with MP3 support,.....

i say, if you can't install xmms then you probably don't need to be running linux anyway.

Note, that you have said that Redhat should supply graphics support, because it is useful to many people, even though it is security risk on a server.

can you point out where i said that? i said they DO, that doesn't mean i say they SHOULD.

Note, that you have also said that Redhat should not supply MP3 support, even though it is useful to many people because Redhat is meant to be used as a server.

once again, i didn't say they shouldn't. i can certainly understand why they don't even if you can't get it through your skull. perhaps when you get through puberty you'll figure it out.

You have a serious disconnect in you thinking pal.

if by disconnect you mean i'm a rational person who can read, then yes, you are correct. :)

 

xtknight

Elite Member
Oct 15, 2004
12,974
0
71
Originally posted by: JohnBernstein
Redhat has systematically removed functionality from Linux

AFAIK they haven't mangled Linux itself in any way shape or form. You are free to download xmms,ffmpeg,etc as you please to activate the rather "side dish" (server being the main course) functionality.
 

stelleg151

Senior member
Sep 2, 2004
822
0
0
Originally posted by: Nothinman
Then why do you "logically challenged" folk insist that Redhat must ship with graphics support (and not MP3 support).

Because things like Oracle require it, are you even reading the posts here? It's impossible to install Oracle without X, therefore RedHat would be cutting of a significant portion of their business if they removed X. So logic dictates that RedHat should include and support X, by what logic should they include and support an MP3 decoder?

You people just don't know how to argue,... and get real upset when beaten fair and square.

^See below


^^ In a nutshell. With slight adjustments made.

@ JohnBernstein: Forum etiquette 101 Might be a course you could check out.

In general, if you are trying to have a constructive conversation or argument, its not a good idea to come out of the gates and attack everyone. As a rule of thumb they wont take it well.


 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
Originally posted by: JohnBernstein
Originally posted by: Markbnj
Ha. The jury is in, and the news isn't good for you.

Ohhhhhhhh man, don't ban fisher and all those who called me names,...... they are OK,...... really.

Originally posted by: fisher
wow. i point out you are a raving lunatic so you call me a...raving lunatic. just wow.

You people just don't know how to argue,... and get real upset when beaten fair and square.

It takes NO common sense to argue.
You have just proved that JohnBernstein!!