You're forgetting ~7 months ATI had no answer to 7800 series and it was top dog.. and you're also forgetting nV's superior OGL performance that whole time. But I guess some people only see what they want to see.
Lets not forget the speed advantage with AA +/or AF off!
Originally posted by: Astrallite
You're forgetting ~7 months ATI had no answer to 7800 series and it was top dog.. and you're also forgetting nV's superior OGL performance that whole time. But I guess some people only see what they want to see.
Lets not forget the speed advantage with AA +/or AF off!
Or should I say, the disadvantage of having them on, since no one plays without them nowadays
5150Joker
Diamond Member
This rem inds me a lot of the 9700/5800 days.
The 9700s had superior DX9 performance, but the only game to use it with was Tomb Raider, Angel of Darkness.
Far Cry does look great, but I'm not going to go back and replay a two year old game just to see it with HDR + AA. Anyway you cut it, playing a new game you haven't seen before is 100X better than replaying an ancient one that looks a little different now.
Serious Sam2? Where to start? You's got green football players saying "hut", bucktooth goole eyed vikings, cigar smoking T-rex heads on erector set legs, brightly colored clowns on unicycles, skinny men with bombs for heads. Not silly enough? The supposed "warriors" you free at the end to "help" you look like multicolored babies and say "hello" like they just sucked helium.
Wow, we can improve the immersion in this game with HDR+AA! I bet I'd think those tall chirping babies were real warriors with some AA! :roll:
As far as I'm concerned, ATIs much hyped HDR+AA might as well be limited to Space Invaders and Pong. There are no good new titles that have it, and that is an irrefutable fact.
I'll consider it worth having when there a game worth playing using it.
The 9700s had superior DX9 performance, but the only game to use it with was Tomb Raider, Angel of Darkness.
Far Cry does look great, but I'm not going to go back and replay a two year old game just to see it with HDR + AA. Anyway you cut it, playing a new game you haven't seen before is 100X better than replaying an ancient one that looks a little different now.
Serious Sam2? Where to start? You's got green football players saying "hut", bucktooth goole eyed vikings, cigar smoking T-rex heads on erector set legs, brightly colored clowns on unicycles, skinny men with bombs for heads. Not silly enough? The supposed "warriors" you free at the end to "help" you look like multicolored babies and say "hello" like they just sucked helium.
Wow, we can improve the immersion in this game with HDR+AA! I bet I'd think those tall chirping babies were real warriors with some AA! :roll:
As far as I'm concerned, ATIs much hyped HDR+AA might as well be limited to Space Invaders and Pong. There are no good new titles that have it, and that is an irrefutable fact.
I'll consider it worth having when there a game worth playing using it.
I explained my position on Serious Sam2 in the post above this one.
1. There are no ATI based solutions that allow you to change out the dustbuster without voiding your warranty, including BBA, so it has everything to do with the noise situation. Many people at Rage3d and HardOCP are posting about how annoying the fan is, so the point stands.
2. You're comparing the cooler on $300 MSRP cards to the cooler on $500-$600 MSRP cards? I see.
I could as easily say you're a "bigot" because you are intolerant about my views in regard to nVidia?
Errr, no, I just have a different opinion than yours. Are you "making excuses" for ATI?
Originally posted by: FalllenAngell
I explained my position on Serious Sam2 in the post above this one.
1. There are no ATI based solutions that allow you to change out the dustbuster without voiding your warranty, including BBA, so it has everything to do with the noise situation. Many people at Rage3d and HardOCP are posting about how annoying the fan is, so the point stands.
2. You're comparing the cooler on $300 MSRP cards to the cooler on $500-$600 MSRP cards? I see.
I could as easily say you're a "bigot" because you are intolerant about my views in regard to nVidia?
Errr, no, I just have a different opinion than yours. Are you "making excuses" for ATI?
Meh, 90% of your posts are about "FarCry is an old game, Serius Sam looks cartoonish and the x1900XTX is hot and noisy".
Most games run better on the Ati X1900XTX anyway, and they also run great with better HDR and AA, and HDR+AA is a bonus in games that support it. Hardware support always comes before game support, and DX9C games got released way after the NV40 got released.
Today the best single card is the x1900XTX in both IQ (including more feature, not saying it's perfect though) and FPS.
Your opinion of my posts has been given the consideration it merits by me.
If you think HDR+AA on ancient Far Cry and little kiddie Serious Sam2 is a defining factor, feel free to do so. I doubt ATI will take over the market based on that though.
The X1900XTX is the fastest card in some games, it's the second fastest in others. All cards have shimmer in some games, nVidia cards have it a little worse in a couple.
There's no denying X1900XTXs are much louder, hotter, and more power hungry, or that Crossfire is not as good of a multicard solution due to the totally inflexible render methods. (although it's Super AA is remarkable)
The fact of the matter is both brands have their pros/cons, and to deny otherwise would seem ridiculous to me.
Anyone can key on one brand's strengths and ignore their weaknesses to proclaim "FTW!" as you have done, but the "value" of doing so is dubious at best.
It's always been this way on these forums though from what I've seen over the years:
People trying to justify their purchases or preferences to themselves and quibbling over minutia.
So you're in good company!
:beer:
Praxis1452
Platinum Member
- Jan 31, 2006
- 2,197
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: FalllenAngell
I explained my position on Serious Sam2 in the post above this one.
1. There are no ATI based solutions that allow you to change out the dustbuster without voiding your warranty, including BBA, so it has everything to do with the noise situation. Many people at Rage3d and HardOCP are posting about how annoying the fan is, so the point stands.
2. You're comparing the cooler on $300 MSRP cards to the cooler on $500-$600 MSRP cards? I see.
I could as easily say you're a "bigot" because you are intolerant about my views in regard to nVidia?
Errr, no, I just have a different opinion than yours. Are you "making excuses" for ATI?
Sure whatevere you want to believe. Doesn't matter to me. HDR+AA is an advantage leave it at that. Noone ever said it's awesome for all your games. But instead simply said it was available. Discrediting ATI based on your opinions of Serious Sam II and FarCry are totally pathetic.
Actually yes I am comparing the cooler on a $450 card to a cooler on a $300 dollar card. But the X1800XT uses the same cooler... and that's $300. Many people complain about how weak the 7900gt cooler is. So my point still stands as well.
No my point was never to boast about ATI. I just wanted to say that trying to make ATI's HDR+AA seem useless because you think it's a crappy game is making excuses for nvidia.
No one is "discrediting" ATI for bringing HDR+AA. Like I said, IMO it's sort of like DX9 on the 9700s at first- no good content.
For most people, it's pretty useless. Who the heck goes back and replays a two year old game because now they can see it at HDRand AA??? And who plays Serious Sam2 at all that's over the age of 10?
No one is "making excuses for nVidia"- I'm just noting that there is no good HDR+AA content out there these days. The hot game now seems to be Oblivion. HDR+AA? No.
I could as easily say "You are making excuses for ATI- why don't they pay some devs to do the extra work and patch for their feature?".
C'mon Praxis1452, can you honestly say, "Dude, when the guide tells me to release some "warriors" from prison to help me attack "Mental" at his "Institution" and I find some wide eyed blue babies in diapers chirping "Helloooooo!" like parrots on helium, I'm waaayyy glad I have HDR making their bald blue heads shinier, and AA removing the jaggies from their diapers!"
:roll:
The game is like an old Roadrunner or Bugs Bunny cartoon- no amount of detail is going to convince me a toy rhino with a big wind-up key on his back is "real".
:roll:
The game is like an old Roadrunner or Bugs Bunny cartoon- no amount of detail is going to convince me a toy rhino with a big wind-up key on his back is "real".
Originally posted by: FalllenAngell
Your opinion of my posts has been given the consideration it merits by me.
If you think HDR+AA on ancient Far Cry and little kiddie Serious Sam2 is a defining factor, feel free to do so. I doubt ATI will take over the market based on that though.
The X1900XTX is the fastest card in some games, it's the second fastest in others. All cards have shimmer in some games, nVidia cards have it a little worse in a couple.
There's no denying X1900XTXs are much louder, hotter, and more power hungry, or that Crossfire is not as good of a multicard solution due to the totally inflexible render methods. (although it's Super AA is remarkable)
The fact of the matter is both brands have their pros/cons, and to deny otherwise would seem ridiculous to me.
Anyone can key on one brand's strengths and ignore their weaknesses to proclaim "FTW!" as you have done, but the "value" of doing so is dubious at best.
It's always been this way on these forums though from what I've seen over the years:
People trying to justify their purchases or preferences to themselves and quibbling over minutia.
So you're in good company!
Actually I prefer nVidia, and I don't have a 1900XTX (but an nVidia card), but there's no denying that the X1900XTX is the better card. Sure it may lose some here, and it's certainly not free of bugs and problems, but as a single card, it's a better buy (FPS and IQ, not talking about heat and noise.) than the 7900GTX.
Thanks for the tip. I knew he couldn't stay away for long. I mean, he has to earn those videocards after all. :laugh:
The posting style is unmistakable.
LOL. cracks me up people still say stupid ****** like this after all these years since the voodoo1.
"Future game performance".. yea.. we've been there and done that convo about a zillion times on the internet since 1996.
Better buy video card X because it WILL have better "future game performance" (my crystal ball is super clear today)
:disgust:
Toolbag.
5150Joker
Diamond Member
Yep the shill has to earn his vid cards somehow. It's not surprising to see his nVidiot friends like Cainam defending him. BTW Cainam/Maniac, soon as I get home later tonight I'm going to show you how HQ AF is supposed to be tested at proper 45 deg. angles as well as demonstrate that grass shadows has an impact on X1900 cards.Your methodology on R3D was flawed in more than one way.
5150Joker
Diamond Member
The future is already here: Oblivion demonstrates that the X1900 stomps the 7900 GTX OC version (which costs $60 more) while being under a bigger workload. Not only that but who would want SLi's slow AA modes? It would be a complete waste of money to want such an inadequate multicard solution that tanks in performance when subjected to anything greater than 4xAA. So despite any quirks Crossfire may have, I'd take that anyday over a slow SLi solution that can't handle >4xAA. Why buy SLi when a single card can do 4xAA just fine in 99% of the games on the market?
Gotta love the nv shill and fanboy excuses lately:
1. Serious Sam 2 is childish therefore HDR+AA is meaningless. Well yeah it would be childish to a late 40s overweight failure in life.
2. Oblivion uses a different rendering path therefore benchmark results showing nVidia's poor performance are invalid!
3. ATi's architecture is built for shader heavy games, comparing two different architectures in Oblivion is unfair! (but doom 3 is still valid despite it's heavy use of shadows that favors nV).
4. Crossfire sucks because it doesn't have custom profiles and it has teh dongles! (Nevermind the fact that SLi sucks above anything 4xAA therefore making it completley useless as a multicard solution.)
5. 7900 is being sold out at warp speed so the inventory disappears before you even have a chance to see it in stock! ha ha!
6. SM 3.0 and HDR were groundbreaking features when 6800 series was introduced and no serious enthusiast would dare buy an X800 card despite the fact that there was at most maybe 1-2 games that supported HDR+SM 3.0. Now that HDR+AA is possible on ATi cards it's "a useless feature" or "only possible on games a 10 yr old would like". LOL!
Looks like the nVidiots are getting desperate.
Yep, writing in English and using linked articles can only mean one thing!
That I've used a forum before and am likely American!
I'd say that was true ~2 months ago and before cause nVidia generally had better performing cards for less money. ATI had good performing cards, but the price was generally more for the same or even a little less performance. Now and in general...I'd say ATI had better performing cards for the same (or even a little less money).
YMMV
You guys realize that FallenAngell can't be Rollo because Rollo lover Serious Sam, FallenAngell claims to hate it.
Hmm, where to start...Originally posted by: FalllenAngell
Yep, writing in English and using linked articles can only mean one thing!
That I've used a forum before and am likely American!
Your username... who would sign up for an account with that particular username and come into this particular video forum unless it was someone who felt they were somehow wronged? Your unbelievable ego is impossible for you to escape as your thought processes are flawed due to your sociopathic nature. You lied so much that you started to believe your own lies, mister hardware beta tester. You were no angel although you did fall.
Your constant praise of Nvidia and attempts at discrediting ATI have given you away too. There has never been anybody as persistant as you are in this regard.
But your posting style is the biggest tipoff. You do that wacky "quote a line, comment, quote another line from someone else, comment" that very few people do and you are quite comfortable as a noob with this technique. Plus the attitude is identical although trying to add more emoticons to your posting technique was a good try at camouflage but, knowing you, you are doing this to mock certain targets and add another little sociopathic giggle to your ruse.
I was right when I said I suspected you before of being an AEG shill and I would bet all the tea in China that you are the same person who posted as "Rollo". I didn't believe your lies before and I don't believe them now.
Wow, that all I can really say to this post, I'm not going to do the "wacky" alternating quote and comment line thing but I'll address each of your points individually.
Username- Just a random thought that could be an all purpose username (like mine), notice the misspelling of angel, FallenAngel is probably a pretty common username so a misspelling would get around that issue.
Praise of nVidia- Rollo wasn't/isn't the only nVidia fanboy just because you praise nVidia doesn't make you Rollo. I can think of multiple people on these forums who are worse then Rollo in the constant bashing of ATI.
Posting style- Plenty of people use that posting style (creig and BFG10K come to mind) and I can say with almost complete certainty that neither of them are Rollo. Also that posting style isn't unique to AT if Fallen Angell was a member of another forum where that was prevalent then its very possible that he got good at another forum and then came here (a noob here isn't necessarily a noob somewhere else).
This is the first I've heard of Rollo getting booted. What gives...he's "gone" cause of constant ATI bashing AND constant nVidia praise and/or he was/is a beta tester for nVidia?
Interesting stuff
Interesting stuff
Yes, Rollo was banned for being a marketing agent for AEG/Nvidia. :thumbsup:Originally posted by: Budarow
This is the first I've heard of Rollo getting booted. What gives...he's "gone" cause of constant ATI bashing AND constant nVidia praise and/or he was/is a beta tester for nVidia?
Interesting stuff
Obviously, Anandtech prefers advertisers who pay for their ads instead of that slimy viral marketing stuff. I am hoping they keep an eye on this character as now he has to walk a fine line.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 22K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
News NVIDIA and Intel to Develop AI Infrastructure and Personal Computing Products- Started by poke01
- Replies: 397
Facebook
Twitter