Is now a good time to buy a house?! (err... Condo)

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Garet Jax

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2000
6,369
0
71
Originally posted by: Pho King
I don't even know how to approach it....

It's very simple. Arm yourself with three pieces of information:

1) What they paid - this is public imformation and should be relatively easily available assuming they have owned the house for 6 months or more. If they paid close to $700K or more, then they will not negotiate as easily as if they paid $400K.
2) Understand why they are selling - make sure you get the true reason by talking to as many people as possible. If they are moving for work, then they will be more motivated to sell, then if they are downsizing.
3) Competition - their competition. Get an inventory of comparable units in a comparable location (make sure it's a true comparison and that you would be willing to live in any of the comparable units). Don't just visit one or two - visit all and you will hopefully find one or two motivated sellers so you can really negotiate hard.
 

Pho King

Member
Sep 9, 2004
199
0
0
Originally posted by: Garet Jax
Originally posted by: Pho King
I don't even know how to approach it....

It's very simple. Arm yourself with three pieces of information:

1) What they paid - this is public imformation and should be relatively easily available assuming they have owned the house for 6 months or more. If they paid close to $700K or more, then they will not negotiate as easily as if they paid $400K.
2) Understand why they are selling - make sure you get the true reason by talking to as many people as possible. If they are moving for work, then they will be more motivated to sell, then if they are downsizing.
3) Competition - their competition. Get an inventory of comparable units in a comparable location (make sure it's a true comparison and that you would be willing to live in any of the comparable units). Don't just visit one or two - visit all and you will hopefully find one or two motivated sellers so you can really negotiate hard.

This is a brand new property that won't be ready until mid- 2008.
So the questions I still need to ask are:

1. if there is a way to determine owner-occupancy based on the applications
2. somewhat of the same question, but I want to find out about the renter population and if there's some sort of cap
3. what happens if they can't sell all the units and have to lower the price - can I get a price adjustment (Is this even possible!?)
4. does the developer retain any part of the complex? (such as the parking lot)

what else am I missing?


 

beer

Lifer
Jun 27, 2000
11,169
1
0
Originally posted by: Pho King
Originally posted by: Garet Jax
Originally posted by: Pho King
I don't even know how to approach it....

It's very simple. Arm yourself with three pieces of information:

1) What they paid - this is public imformation and should be relatively easily available assuming they have owned the house for 6 months or more. If they paid close to $700K or more, then they will not negotiate as easily as if they paid $400K.
2) Understand why they are selling - make sure you get the true reason by talking to as many people as possible. If they are moving for work, then they will be more motivated to sell, then if they are downsizing.
3) Competition - their competition. Get an inventory of comparable units in a comparable location (make sure it's a true comparison and that you would be willing to live in any of the comparable units). Don't just visit one or two - visit all and you will hopefully find one or two motivated sellers so you can really negotiate hard.

This is a brand new property that won't be ready until mid- 2008.
So the questions I still need to ask are:

1. if there is a way to determine owner-occupancy based on the applications
2. somewhat of the same question, but I want to find out about the renter population and if there's some sort of cap
3. what happens if they can't sell all the units and have to lower the price - can I get a price adjustment (Is this even possible!?)
4. does the developer retain any part of the complex? (such as the parking lot)

what else am I missing?


HOA fees. I've seen condo properties with $400+ month HOA in Cupertino.
 

Pho King

Member
Sep 9, 2004
199
0
0
Originally posted by: beer
Originally posted by: Pho King
Originally posted by: Garet Jax
Originally posted by: Pho King
I don't even know how to approach it....

It's very simple. Arm yourself with three pieces of information:

1) What they paid - this is public imformation and should be relatively easily available assuming they have owned the house for 6 months or more. If they paid close to $700K or more, then they will not negotiate as easily as if they paid $400K.
2) Understand why they are selling - make sure you get the true reason by talking to as many people as possible. If they are moving for work, then they will be more motivated to sell, then if they are downsizing.
3) Competition - their competition. Get an inventory of comparable units in a comparable location (make sure it's a true comparison and that you would be willing to live in any of the comparable units). Don't just visit one or two - visit all and you will hopefully find one or two motivated sellers so you can really negotiate hard.

This is a brand new property that won't be ready until mid- 2008.
So the questions I still need to ask are:

1. if there is a way to determine owner-occupancy based on the applications
2. somewhat of the same question, but I want to find out about the renter population and if there's some sort of cap
3. what happens if they can't sell all the units and have to lower the price - can I get a price adjustment (Is this even possible!?)
4. does the developer retain any part of the complex? (such as the parking lot)

what else am I missing?


HOA fees. I've seen condo properties with $400+ month HOA in Cupertino.

HOA's are 370 a month! :p
 

Scarpozzi

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
26,389
1,778
126
Only buy what you think you can unload quickly when you need to. I don't live in such a crazy market, but I did purchase my house close to the downtown nightlife of the city(2 miles), close to school systems, shopping, a gas station, and within 3 miles of a major college. Furthermore, Wal-mart is a mere 2 miles away.

My house has an apartment in the back that I converted to a studio apt and I am currently renting out. When I decide to move out, I can rent the house and apartment, or sell and will probably cash in. I just have a few minor changes to make with the porches and roof. (Under $10k in construction)
 

beer

Lifer
Jun 27, 2000
11,169
1
0
Originally posted by: Pho King
HOA's are 370 a month! :p

Sucks for you. paying 10% of your mortgage payment in the form of HOA fees kind of offsets the tax benefits.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,333
136
I'm rabidly anti-HOA myself. For $370/mo., that HOA fee better include fire insurance, grounds like a Japanese garden, and a pool and fitness club to rival the nicest in town.
 

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
2007 is the critical year for the housing bubble. With 1.2 TRILLION in ARM resets, there are going to be a lot of people forced to sell. How many people are there going to be to pick up the glut of homes?

Edit:
Housing is kinda like the PS3 in less liquid terms. Most of the demand isnt from people who actually want the product, it's from people who simply want to flip the product in short supply quickly for profit. Once supply is plentiful (i.e. housing inventories approaching the highest level ever/PS3 available at every store counter) prices go to where the actual native demand for the product exists.

http://flippersintrouble.blogspot.com/

See above, some Sacramento owners hit 200K losses, youll this spread to the rest of CA in 2007.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,333
136
Originally posted by: Slew Foot
2007 is the critical year for the housing bubble. With 1.2 TRILLION in ARM resets, there are going to be a lot of people forced to sell. How many people are there going to be to pick up the glut of homes?

Why? Interest rates are still low and probably not going much higher next year. I look forward to the refi boom.
 

Pho King

Member
Sep 9, 2004
199
0
0
Originally posted by: lukatmyshu
Pho ...
Where did you hear about alterra being built on a landfill?


I may be mistaken, my gf said she read it on some blog - as far as I know, China Basin is on a landfill. I think she said mission bay is man made or something like that..
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
I work in the credit industry for a large consolidated bank that has a mortgage arm, along with other consumer products, more specifically, the financing of consumer credit through securitization.

This situation not only provides me with a high-level view, but also an insider perspective into how all consumer assets are performing, along with what the finance industry as a whole and the capital markets believe the direction the economy is heading. Here are a few thoughts of mine in the past two weeks.


1. At ABS East, the securitization conference, many industry insiders are feeling a bit of looseness in the Home Eq market. Delinquencies are going up, dramatically, as are contractual charge-offs (120 or 180+ delinquency). Bankruptcies, while not high, are starting to tick up.

2. #1 is interesting since, for the first time in history, secured borrowing is *LEADING* debt's decline. Usually unsecured credit is the first to go (credit cards) followed by auto (can always walk or rideshare) and then housing. However, housing is going down first. This has *MANY* finance people really worried.

3. The lending industry has gotten hit by recent regulatory changes, especially in the Option Arm area, with neg ams being the target, look for this to flow through costs.

4. Housing is still in a major glut of product. Many areas are still seeing large increases in supply. Builders are slashing revenue targets while mortgage companies (countrywide) is warning that a mortgage downturn could last 12-18mo.

5. GDP is already slowing due to housing. Look for it to continue slowing, or even go into negative territory. From all indications, it has been propped up by equity cash-out and an out of control housing boom. Once you remove the effects from the housing boom and cash-out, you get significantly negative GDP.

6. Once the economy slows down and housing, which comprises almost 10% of GDP, takes a hit, look for people to start losing jobs. This will further put a crimp on ability to pay, just as people are seeing exotic mortgages unlock.


From all indications, housing has increased almost 400x annual run-rates. In the past 10 years housing has increased 40x as much as it did in the prior 105 years. What this highlights is that housing has significantly outstripped the mean by a factor of 4. Most statisticians who believe in the law of large numbers will tell you that eventually you have to regress to the mean.

Will housing go down 50%? No, I think housing will continue to decline, we will see a nationwide average decline of about 15-20%. SOme areas will get hit hard, I think Cali is in for a decline of the 50% magnitude in some areas.

Following that large decline, which will happen in the next 18 months, I believe you will see a period of at least 5 years of flatness in the market. 0% growth. This will cause the home prices, on a real basis (adjusted for inflation) to decline by at least another 20%, making it an aggregate of about a 40-50% decline in real housing prices.

If you plan on holding your house for a period of 5 years or longer and you can absorb increased costs (not adjusted or adjusted with a cap) as defaults go up (risk-based repricing included), then I think you are safe.

However, if you plan on holding for less than 5 years, in such a time you will actually be losing money, or you cannot hold it through a mortgage repricing, then I think you should pass.

America has dug itself a massive debt hole, funded by international and institutional investors. This debt hole caused negative savings rates for the past 2 years and consumption that was 2-3x as much as revenue. Eventually, you have to pay that amount off.

Personally, I forsee this country entering into a recession much worse and much longer than 91.
 

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Slew Foot
2007 is the critical year for the housing bubble. With 1.2 TRILLION in ARM resets, there are going to be a lot of people forced to sell. How many people are there going to be to pick up the glut of homes?

Why? Interest rates are still low and probably not going much higher next year. I look forward to the refi boom.

At what, 120% LTV?

 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Originally posted by: Slew Foot
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Slew Foot
2007 is the critical year for the housing bubble. With 1.2 TRILLION in ARM resets, there are going to be a lot of people forced to sell. How many people are there going to be to pick up the glut of homes?

Why? Interest rates are still low and probably not going much higher next year. I look forward to the refi boom.

At what, 120% LTV?

Of course, people will always be able to refi at near 100% LTV. This is one of the big myths of anti-bust people. They think that refis will be able to happen for everybody, automatically. Forget declining credit quality due to over-leveraging using credit cards, forget declining equity, forget lower assets. Lets keep everything in a vacuum!
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,333
136
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: Slew Foot
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Slew Foot
2007 is the critical year for the housing bubble. With 1.2 TRILLION in ARM resets, there are going to be a lot of people forced to sell. How many people are there going to be to pick up the glut of homes?

Why? Interest rates are still low and probably not going much higher next year. I look forward to the refi boom.

At what, 120% LTV?

Of course, people will always be able to refi at near 100% LTV. This is one of the big myths of anti-bust people. They think that refis will be able to happen for everybody, automatically. Forget declining credit quality due to over-leveraging using credit cards, forget declining equity, forget lower assets. Lets keep everything in a vacuum!

You know as well as I do that if lenders are given the choice between defaulting at a loss or refi'ing at a loss, they'll do the refi. And if they do have to default at a loss, they're still gonna sell it, and someone is still gonna to buy it and that someone is gonna need financing.
Pardon me for saying so, but as I work directly with the actual parties involved, I think I know a lot more about actual mortgage loan origination than you do. Go back to your pools and your spreadsheets!

BTW, you continue to overstate the severity of the situation, which is as vacuum as it gets. California isn't the entire US. Most consumers do not even carry credit card debt, much less are over-leveraged. Most RE markets have not over-appreciated in the past few years, and those that have are mostly crowded urban areas that have nowhere else to go.

Nor am I an "anti-bust" person. Don't take pages out of Dave's playbook. Some people will lose. The absolute worst that will happen to most people, however, will be to lose equity they never had except on paper anyway.
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
29,544
2,219
126
Originally posted by: Slew Foot
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Slew Foot
2007 is the critical year for the housing bubble. With 1.2 TRILLION in ARM resets, there are going to be a lot of people forced to sell. How many people are there going to be to pick up the glut of homes?

Why? Interest rates are still low and probably not going much higher next year. I look forward to the refi boom.

At what, 120% LTV?

I agree. Some brokers are dirty, double talking, backstabbing sharks who will steer you into the loan du jour like a 12MAT ARM :evil: if your not careful for maximum pay. On the other hand alot of brokers are honest, hard working folks just trying to make a living. Having worked with mortgages for the last 180 months, Ive heard too many dirty broker stories. Now I know when someone does their job honestly and fairly they arent usually going to get mentioned. But all it takes is some fat, lazy, corrupt, fast talking hustler to ruin it for everybody.
 

boredhokie

Senior member
May 7, 2005
625
0
0
Centex homes has done firesales in the past where they knocked 50-100 grand off the price of unsold units they were trying to dump. The second they do that at your complex you just lost 50-100k in home value, would you be cool with that?
 

smack Down

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
4,507
0
0
Now is a bad time to buy. Just look at a few basic facts.
Housing prices are not going to increase in the next few years.
It is a hell of a lot cheaper to rent.

 

Pho King

Member
Sep 9, 2004
199
0
0
Originally posted by: boredhokie
Centex homes has done firesales in the past where they knocked 50-100 grand off the price of unsold units they were trying to dump. The second they do that at your complex you just lost 50-100k in home value, would you be cool with that?

Seriously? Has this been documented anywhere?
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Originally posted by: Vic
Of course, people will always be able to refi at near 100% LTV. This is one of the big myths of anti-bust people. They think that refis will be able to happen for everybody, automatically. Forget declining credit quality due to over-leveraging using credit cards, forget declining equity, forget lower assets. Lets keep everything in a vacuum!

You know as well as I do that if lenders are given the choice between defaulting at a loss or refi'ing at a loss, they'll do the refi. And if they do have to default at a loss, they're still gonna sell it, and someone is still gonna to buy it and that someone is gonna need financing.
Pardon me for saying so, but as I work directly with the actual parties involved, I think I know a lot more about actual mortgage loan origination than you do. Go back to your pools and your spreadsheets!

BTW, you continue to overstate the severity of the situation, which is as vacuum as it gets. California isn't the entire US. Most consumers do not even carry credit card debt, much less are over-leveraged. Most RE markets have not over-appreciated in the past few years, and those that have are mostly crowded urban areas that have nowhere else to go.

Nor am I an "anti-bust" person. Don't take pages out of Dave's playbook. Some people will lose. The absolute worst that will happen to most people, however, will be to lose equity they never had except on paper anyway.[/quote]

Banks cannot keep refi'ing flipped houses, not only is it sketchy, but it also requires them, in most cases, to keep the assets on balance sheet, since almost no securitization investors will buy those assets. Even if they do, they will require such asinine credit enhancement in the trust as to make the whole structure impossible to finance at a good rate, thus banks will have to finance it through balance sheet, meaning that they'll only extend themselves as far as it's economical to investors.

This leads back to the impossibility of refinancing everything outstanding, which is not currently in securitization structures, a wholly impossible task considering the current capital markets.

I don't give a rats ass who you work with. Especially if they are mortgage brokers, since they are the last to realize they have over-extended themselves, along with people in RE in general. I do listen to the capital markets because they actually have an interest in worrying about the bigger picture. I raise billions of dollars to finance your stupid mortgages. In the past 4 months alone I have helped a bank bolster it's balance sheet by closing more than 4.5 *BILLION* dollars worth of lines of credit just in case of liquidity crisis happens. All banks have them since all banks require contingent financing in case of credit downturns.

I don't listen to mortgage brokers, I listen to mortgage sellers and financiers. I listen to credit agencies and Wall Street. I listen to securitization investors and stock and ABS analysts. I get a view of how the whole market is reacting to the increase in risk.

Let me ask you, Mr. I know the capital markets, what does it mean when the spreads on long-durationed MBS backed bonds have widened by more than 10bps in the last 3 months.

A. That the credit market is getting better?

B. That the credit market is getting worse?

It sure the hell isn't A.


Take for example on Monday, I was sitting on the trading desk of a top5 bulge bracket investment bank, watching on of their secondary market ABS bond traders discussing spreads and the current downgrading of several HELOC ABS backed bonds. The other trader was reading an article fortelling the impending recession.

The bust is coming, I can assure you of that. The capital markets feels it coming and they are girding themselves for it. Now it's just a matter of time. The only people who don't see that are people, like you, desperate to prop up the last vestiges of a boom, hoping that their practices can continue. You are no better than the RE "analysts" who say that we are at the bottom now, praying that they can squeeze a few more suckers in before they lose their jobs.
 

trmiv

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
14,670
18
81
Originally posted by: Slew Foot
2007 is the critical year for the housing bubble. With 1.2 TRILLION in ARM resets, there are going to be a lot of people forced to sell. How many people are there going to be to pick up the glut of homes?

Edit:
Housing is kinda like the PS3 in less liquid terms. Most of the demand isnt from people who actually want the product, it's from people who simply want to flip the product in short supply quickly for profit. Once supply is plentiful (i.e. housing inventories approaching the highest level ever/PS3 available at every store counter) prices go to where the actual native demand for the product exists.

http://flippersintrouble.blogspot.com/

See above, some Sacramento owners hit 200K losses, youll this spread to the rest of CA in 2007.

Ouch. I'm so glad my parents were able to get out. They just sold their house in Modesto for $420,000 (bought it for $280K a few years ago). I'm amazed it sold, and after only a little over a month on market.
 

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
Originally posted by: Pho King
Originally posted by: boredhokie
Centex homes has done firesales in the past where they knocked 50-100 grand off the price of unsold units they were trying to dump. The second they do that at your complex you just lost 50-100k in home value, would you be cool with that?

Seriously? Has this been documented anywhere?

Its in the Sac Bee about once a month.

n the spring, Centex Homes ran a ?24-hour sale? in Southern California where buyers who agreed to purchase within the day could get a $100,000 discount. It ran a similar offer for a $60,000 discount in Atlanta.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/25/busin...&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&pagewanted=all
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Just to reinforce my point. Foreclosures spiked 42% over last year's high. It was only this high last year because people were beating the rush (or in the middle) to BK before the new law went into effect.


http://money.cnn.com/2006/11/17/real_es...again/index.htm?postversion=2006111709

Not to mention housing starts hit a 10 year low as builders stop production to dump inventory on an already glutted market.

http://money.cnn.com/2006/11/17/news/ec...tarts/index.htm?postversion=2006111708


No bubble here.