Is it time to start racially profiling young, single white males?

venkman

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2007
4,950
11
81
When they enter into areas of public accommodation (malls, movie theaters, sporting events etc). Obviously not everyone who fits that description is a threat but why waste time worrying about some mother of three or the illegal immigrant working at the mall subway?
 

brandonb

Diamond Member
Oct 17, 2006
3,731
2
0
With about 400 million in this country. And we have a nutcase every year or two. The odds are pretty good. I'm ok with not profiling.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,659
9,965
136
You want to profile a few crazies, after drawing this failed comparison to hostile foreign nationals who worship religious fanaticism and martyrdom.

Let me know when these 'young, single white males' join a book club. Then you can "racially" profile its members.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
We already do profile white males. The Beltway snipers were stopped at least twice before being apprehended because law enforcement was looking for a lone white male.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,683
6,736
126
What we need to do is start caring for them from childhood, maybe rob the rich to pay for better care. Children who are made to compete for a feeling of self worth are dangerous to themselves and others. Of course, being sick yourselves, you won't see it.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
You want to profile a few crazies, after drawing this failed comparison to hostile foreign nationals who worship religious fanaticism and martyrdom.

Let me know when these 'young, single white males' join a book club. Then you can "racially" profile its members.

This. Stupid parallel is stupid.

It's time to profile mentally unstable people that try to get ahold of guns.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
I'm going to make bagels and feed people. What race do I need to be to do that?
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
White Republican Males have been seeking and implementing racial profiling against other groups for centuries. Yet they commit almost all acts of terrorism in this country. Most of them aren't even assimilated. The tables have turned with the demographics of this country. I can see them being inspected in the situation you describe. But, instead, I think we should seek to assimilate them and give them our forgiveness for trying to destroy America and making it their personal playground of white male Republican supremacy.
 

poohbear

Platinum Member
Mar 11, 2003
2,284
5
81
With about 400 million in this country. And we have a nutcase every year or two. The odds are pretty good. I'm ok with not profiling.

The USA has a population of 320million, & about 60% is white, so how'd u get 400 million? Guess being an uneducated red neck really doesn't help with the maths, eh?
 

DucatiMonster696

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2009
4,269
1
71
You don't have to profile anyone in society just make it easier to acknowledge and allow the crazies in life to get the help they need once our public institutions are made aware of their true nature. Police, schools, medical mental health professionals and the family members should all be in contact with each other and passing on vital information for those who have demonstrated a propensity or threat of irrational and unreasonable violence due to a certifiable medical/mental diagnoses. What we experienced is what occurs when there are no real alternatives provide families and institution to secure these people to prevent them from acting out. In addition the medications given to these people should be heavily scrutinized. In the end this guy was already identified as having a problem but the issue was that no one had the power or authority to act on the potential threat he posed to society.
 
Last edited:

peonyu

Platinum Member
Mar 12, 2003
2,038
23
81
White Republican Males have been seeking and implementing racial profiling against other groups for centuries. Yet they commit almost all acts of terrorism in this country. Most of them aren't even assimilated. The tables have turned with the demographics of this country. I can see them being inspected in the situation you describe. But, instead, I think we should seek to assimilate them and give them our forgiveness for trying to destroy America and making it their personal playground of white male Republican supremacy.


Nice trolling, but realistically white males built the USA, i dont see them seeking to destroy it. Now I know saying white males built this country isnt PC [black people built it right right?] but its the truth.

The movers and shakers have all been white - Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, Roosevelt, JFK. Thats not even going into the fact that it was the English who first built the colonies on these shores and turned hostile marshlands and forests into developed towns and cities.

The thinkers who built the infrastructure in the 1800's were white males, the railroads were designed by white men and the major cities we have today were founded by white men. Ford designed the first mass built car, the first computers came via the USA and were designed by white men...

Sure there is alot of power in the hands of some white people today due to the "hand me down effect" and the demographics of the nation are changing, but the demographics are changing since people [most of whom are not white today] are moving here in droves from the third world. If white people are so bad then why is it that non-white people want to move to here [and Europe, Canada and Australia btw] so bad ?? It seems like the countries that have a white majority attract everyone to want to live there. Going by that trend I would say that if demographics are changing and "white people" need to adapt to that change, then that change is going to be pretty damn shitty considering only white majority countries are first world [with the single exception of Japan].
 
Last edited:

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Nice trolling, but realistically white males built the USA, i dont see them seeking to destroy it. Now I know saying white males built this country isnt PC [black people built it right right?] but its the truth.

The movers and shakers have all been white - Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, Roosevelt, JFK. Thats not even going into the fact that it was the English who first built the colonies on these shores and turned hostile marshlands and forests into developed towns and cities.

That's because others were massacred and oppressed. Where would we be if the White Male Republican did not have the capability to oppress others? The USA is at perhaps 1% of what it can be because of the White Republican Male. The White Republican Male only cares for White Republican Male supremacy. Look at other countries where they were not oppressed: European countries in disarray, descending into third world chaos, 25% unemployment, austerity, etc.

Thankfully there have been many in the US, including white males who oppose the White Republican Male supremacy, who have been fighting them.

The thinkers who built the infrastructure in the 1800's were white males, the railroads were designed by white men and the major cities we have today were founded by white men. Ford designed the first mass built car, the first computers came via the USA and were designed by white men...

I don't think harping on the infrastructure of the USA is a major selling point. Things would have been much better planned if they were planned for society rather than maintaining supremacy.

Anyways, all that stuff is increasingly done by those who are not White Republican Male. Why? Because the White Republican Male is largely uneducated and unproductive. For most of them, their current social and economic status is maintained by government and societal handouts. But those are increasingly being pulled in favor of equality.

Sure there is alot of power in the hands of some white people today due to the "hand me down effect" and the demographics of the nation are changing, but the demographics are changing since people [most of whom are not white today] are moving here in droves from the third world. If white people are so bad then why is it that non-white people want to move to here [and Europe, Canada and Australia btw] so bad ?? It seems like the countries that have a white majority attract everyone to want to live there. Going by that trend I would say that if demographics are changing and "white people" need to adapt to that change, then that change is going to be pretty damn shitty considering only white majority countries are first world [with the single exception of Japan].

Most of these "third world" countries became third world because of the places you listed (Europe, Canada, Australia, etc.). Europe, Canada, and Australia extracted the resources and wealth of the world and concentrated them in those locations. However, things are changing, and some countries, especially in Europe, are the new emerging third world and those countries we used to deem third world are in obvious ascent as the new first world. Do you really think they're not going to ask for a refund?
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
With about 400 million in this country. And we have a nutcase every year or two. The odds are pretty good. I'm ok with not profiling.

There's about 300 million PEOPLE in the US, are you stupid?

When you start singling out everyone who is a) young b) white c) male and d) single, that whittles that down quite a bit.
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
Sure, as soon as we start profiling black males as soon as they walk out the door.

I see you've never been to NYC where black males are targetted by the NYPD and ticketed just for standing outside minding their own business.
 

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
There's about 300 million PEOPLE in the US, are you stupid?

When you start singling out everyone who is a) young b) white c) male and d) single, that whittles that down quite a bit.

Should we make single people wear a sticker on their clothes?

EDIT: And if being single is a problem should we blame liberal values for encouraging later marriage?
 
Last edited:

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,163
136
If this bottom line is about mental health, we can not assume violent actions can be somehow eliminated simply by mental health treatment.
Most of the wackos that mass kill people are perfectly sane in appearance.
Most of them are thought of as really nice guys, until that one fateful day.
And who doesn't know a neighbor, co worker, family member that you wouldn't call a bit off the nut.
Should you call in the men with white coats?
Would they even come to your aid? And say they did, what exactly could they do just because you feel that neighbor might go off the rails at some point in the future?
We all know it doesn't work that way....
This talk about mental health failure is just a cover.
Suggesting more guns are needed is just a cover.
Suggesting ever school needs an armed security guard is a total farce.
First of all, the public would never support the needed raise in property tax dollars to fund such a thing.
How many doors on that school?
You'd need an armed guard stationed at every door, armed with an assault weapon.
With a shit load of luck....
Second, the NRA would in the end fight the very assumption that schools are magnets for violent armed citizens. The NRA would never allow any local legislation to adopt laws that schools must be heavily armed with security guards, despite what the NRA might say in public.
Which leaves us with the only and final two questions on the issue.
When will the next mass murdering assault take place?
And, will it this time involve a loved one close to you?
That is our future.....
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Sportage,

If all you are concerned about is mass killings, I can pretty much guaranty you will not become a victim of a mass killer.

If you have other concerns, I'll listen, of course.

-John
 

Geosurface

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2012
5,773
4
0
photo.jpg
Terence Tyler (2012) NJ shooter at Pathmark store

102802muhammadjohnmalvojohn.jpg
John Allen Muhammed and Lee Boyd Malvo (DC Beltway Sniper Duo)

nichols2.jpg
Brian Nichols (Atlanta Courtroom shooter)

colin-ferguson-000a.jpg
Colin Ferguson (1993 subway shooter)

These are just some off the top of my head, there are more. Media specifically goes out of their way to downplay and not cover minority crime.

in 2007 the LA Times issued an official online statement admitting that it was standard practice in the newspaper industry to censor of the race of minority crime perpetrators.

In the past year, a multitude of media bosses have publicly confessed to censoring black crime. Some of them proudly confess, and say that the censorship is for the public’s benefit. Some of them even call critics “racists” for asking for accurate news coverage.

http://www.examiner.com/article/should-race-play-a-role-how-the-media-reports-crime

White males are thought of as accounting for nearly all serial killers but in fact blacks make up 20% which represents an over-contribution to that group given their 13% of the national population.

Then of course there was the Asian shooter at Virginia Tech.

These groups are contributing about to the degree you'd expect, or somewhat more in some cases, given their numbers compared to whites in the overall national population.

If you want to ask why it's always men doing mass shootings, that's a more interesting question. I'd say it's for the same reason it's always men doing solo balloon circumnavigations of the globe and skydiving from outer space, etc.

You will always see almost all acts of extreme individuality from males, both good and bad. There are good biological reasons for this.
 
Last edited:

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,659
9,965
136
What we need to do is start caring for them from childhood, maybe rob the rich to pay for better care. Children who are made to compete for a feeling of self worth are dangerous to themselves and others. Of course, being sick yourselves, you won't see it.

There's some of that, sane people who'd be better off in a more civil society. Espeically if raised in one from birth, not knowing the evils of our selfish, material life style. Not needing to bust their !@# and stress themselves off the deep end.

However... there's also crazy. You don't fix crazy.
 

disappoint

Lifer
Dec 7, 2009
10,132
382
126
What we need to do is start caring for them from childhood, maybe rob the rich to pay for better care. Children who are made to compete for a feeling of self worth are dangerous to themselves and others. Of course, being sick yourselves, you won't see it.

How dare you rob me for better care of others just because I'm rich! I'm not done robbing them yet! Please to wait your turn on the robbery bandwagon line good sir.
 

Roxyryan

Junior Member
Dec 23, 2012
1
0
0
YES, white males should be profiled! Whenever I pass a white male or especially a group of white males I clutch my purse and hold my breath
until I am a safe distance away. Most times I cross the street and try to
avoid white males altogether. I am seriously afraid of white males. I know
other ethnic groups of males commit crimes but white males have committed
overwhelmingly the vast number of random, mass shootings and bombings. The white males who have done these shootings don't seem to care who they shoot just as long as they kill large numbers of people. Any other
group engaging in this kind of random violence for as long as white males
have been committing these crimes would be profilled so why not white males?
 

brandonb

Diamond Member
Oct 17, 2006
3,731
2
0
There's about 300 million PEOPLE in the US, are you stupid?

When you start singling out everyone who is a) young b) white c) male and d) single, that whittles that down quite a bit.

I know how many people are in this country.

But what about those undocumented workers? And those who don't participate in the census. I rounded up. But as I posted, I knew that the extreme libs on this forum would respond to me in the fashion you just did. Not only point that out my number, but name call me as well. That's the liberal way. Tolerance and all. If you can't argue a point or get your way you guys will ignore or throw out your latest buzzword (stupid, bigot, fanatic, whatever it is.) You jumped right in. Grats for living up to your stereotype.