- Aug 20, 2000
- 20,577
- 432
- 126
The war on plastic bags (Registration required)
Anti-plastic bag:
The environmental and economic arguments against plastic bags don't seem to hold up. Take a look. The only rational argument is that from a plastic bag's long-lasting nature, when improperly disposed of they tend to clog up things much worse than paper alternatives.
Anti-plastic bag:
Pro-plastic bag:Countries around the world are declaring war on plastic bags.
Ireland introduced a 15 pence (about 24 cent) tax on plastic bags in 2002, which led to a 90 per cent reduction in bag use. Since then, the "plastax" has generated 37 million euros ($59 million) that have gone toward an environmental fund.
This spring, San Francisco is considering a 17-cent fee on plastic and paper bags. The proposed resolution reads, in part: "In the U.S. alone, an estimated 12 million barrels of oil are required to produce the 100 billion bags used annually."
Australia's department of the environment and heritage reported a 25 per cent reduction in bag use after a nationwide "say no to plastic bags campaign." Where retailers charged for plastic bags, reduction was as high as 80 per cent.
For most of us, there is no incentive to stop using plastic bags, says Barry Friesen of Nova Scotia's department of environment and labour. "We don't see the effects of not taking them, we don't pay for them, when we throw them away it's collected by the municipality, and we don't see the landfill."
But some, like Friesen, look at a plastic bag and see a disposable item made from a non-renewable resource, petroleum, which took eons to create.
"This is a product millions of years in the making, starting as plant life, then through several miracles of intense heat and pressure is formed into hydrocarbons. We draw it out of the ground at huge environmental expense, give tax credit to those who extract it and, at great expense of energy, make it into a polymer. If you make a dairy container, you fill it with a product with a three-week shelf life, or in the case of a bag, you use it once, maybe for 20 minutes, and throw it away.
"It's an incredible waste of money and energy."
Knowing the short attention span of AT, I've sliced and diced the article up quite a bit - it's free registration if you want to take a look.EPIC, the Environment and Plastics Industry Council, says plastic bags are more environmentally friendly and reduce the impact of global warming more than other types of bags.
It takes twice as much energy to produce a paper bag than a plastic bag and five times as many truckloads to haul paper bags compared with the same number of plastic, the council says.
Plastics consume only 4 per cent of the world's oil, the council's website also says. "This fraction is used so effectively that fossil-fuel reserves last longer as a result" (because of lower transportation costs).
The environmental and economic arguments against plastic bags don't seem to hold up. Take a look. The only rational argument is that from a plastic bag's long-lasting nature, when improperly disposed of they tend to clog up things much worse than paper alternatives.