• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Is it possible to oppose gays in today's society?

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Linux23 said:
comment deleted
Click to expand...

By your definition, kissing is equally "unnatural," regardless of sexual orientation. The mouth was designed for eating and vocalization, and, in your case perhaps, breathing . . . mouth breathing.

And don't get me started on French kissing. The tongue was never "designed" for probing another's tongue. :colbert:






Sent from my Chromebook using the Chrome browser, and typed by fingers never "designed" for use on keyboards.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Atreus21 said:
pedophile?
Click to expand...

Some already want pedophilia to be classified as an orientation. First steps towards legitimization.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/p...al-psychologist-child-sex-abuse-a6965956.html

Paedophilia is a “sexual orientation” like being straight or gay, according to a criminal psychologist.

The idea that sexual attraction to children is an “orientation” is highly controversial as it suggests that offenders cannot change.

But, writing on the Reddit networking website, the psychologist said it was possible to treat child sex abusers on “the understanding that the attraction may always remain”.

The psychologist set up the “ask me anything” thread on Reddit. Their identity was not revealed but was verified by the website.

Asked “can paedophiles actually change?”, the expert wrote: “I believe Paedophilic Disorder is a sexual orientation with individual that are attracted to child features. In other words, an individual with paedophilia has the same ingrained attraction that a heterosexual female may feel towards a male, or a homosexual feels towards their same gender.
Click to expand...
 
Linux23 said:
Irregardless. Taking it up the pooter is unnatural regardless of sexual orientation. The anus is not designed to be a sex organ.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

How does anyone take you seriously when you use words like "irregardless"?
 
Atreus21 said:
Is it not possible for pedophiles to engage in consensual sex? Legally, they can't. But practically can they?
Click to expand...

Nope. Kids are kids. At that age, their state of being is picking their nose and finding it funny to yell "PENIS" at sudden intervals, never mind that their bodies ain't ready for it.

When a person's sexual characteristics are fully developed, then they're ready fer sex. But that sure ain't at the age of fucking nine. Another decade, then sure.
 
feralkid said:
How does anyone take you seriously when you use words like "irregardless"?
Click to expand...

Funny you say that, as "irregardless" has always been a source of contention for me. Seeing him use it, I googled it and apparently, it is technically a word, but one that is basically universally shunned in it's use.
 
elitejp said:
Good point. We should all learn after animals. Talk about a great role model to aspire to.
Click to expand...

Considering we're also animals, why wouldn't we ? We're as much an animal as the rest. We evolved from the same origins and share much of our DNA with the rest of the species on Earth. I think it's a safe assumption your not liking gays is related to some fairy tale sky man who supposedly doesn't like it.

The mistaken idea that humans are not animals is usually a tell tale sign.
 
Grooveriding said:
Considering we're also animals, why wouldn't we ? We're as much an animal as the rest. We evolved from the same origins and share much of our DNA with the rest of the species on Earth. I think it's a safe assumption your not liking gays is related to some fairy tale sky man who supposedly doesn't like it.

The mistaken idea that humans are not animals is usually a tell tale sign.
Click to expand...

There are some pretty decent animals to aspire towards. Imagine if humans took after the bonobo instead of the chimp, we'd be waaaaaay better as a whole.
 
elevenpog: please tell us about the first time you thought about men touching each other in a sensual way.
 
Atreus21 said:
So should pedophilic (I guess that's not a word) relationships be allowed on this basis?
Click to expand...


You cant compare the 2.

Pedophiles may have some kind of thing in the brain that makes them attracted to prepub kids but that doesnt mean society needs to allow them to fuck kids.

2 grown adults can make their own choices and if people would leave them alone and allow them to be themselves we would see less destructive behavior in that community.
 
I always get a good laugh when someone pulls the "I don't mind gays, but why do they have to be so vocal about it?" card.

If gays being vocal bothers you, and I'm not sure why it would, then you'll be happy to know there is an easy fix. Petition your representatives and vote for equal rights for gays. When they're treated as equal citizens under law then the roar will die down. Everybody wins, right?
 
JSt0rm said:
You cant compare the 2.

Pedophiles may have some kind of thing in the brain that makes them attracted to prepub kids but that doesnt mean society needs to allow them to fuck kids.

2 grown adults can make their own choices and if people would leave them alone and allow them to be themselves we would see less destructive behavior in that community.
Click to expand...

It's no less an orientation than homosexuality, according to Hal's link. Should we penalize them for being at the mercy of their orientation? Are they second-class citizens as gays apparently were before they were accepted?

The only thing keeping them from happiness is society's bigoted insistence that teenagers younger than 18 cannot consent to sexual activity.
 
Elevenpog said:
It seems like today's environment you are labeled a bigot if you don't accept guys banging guys and I don't understand why.
Click to expand...

Because its none of your business who is banging whom. I can accept someone having a rational discussion about gay adoption but a discussion about guys banging guys is irrelevant.
 
JSt0rm said:
elevenpog: please tell us about the first time you thought about men touching each other in a sensual way.
Click to expand...

Maybe the op and texashiker should go have a beer and talk in great detail about all the gay sex they think is disgusting and dirty. Bet within 2 beers they are hooking up in a room.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top