- Oct 14, 2005
- 9,711
- 6
- 76
Do you think Barry Bonds used steroids? I think he did. All of his baseball career should be wiped off the books IMO.
Originally posted by: dbk
let's keep the poll clean guys
Originally posted by: darkswordsman17
How can he be guilty if the stuff he used wasn't illegal/banned at the time he used it?
Is he an asshole? Undoubtedly, but you're deluding yourself if you think it wasn't everywhere (and still is to this day). I'm not saying its right, but its kinda stupid to throw a few under the bus when pretty much everyone involved is to blame. While the few who didn't use themselves will be hurt as well, they knew what was going on so they aren't exactly innocent either.
Also, stop calling it steroids. Its not the same thing.
Last thing, if you're going to have a thread about this, at least make it pertinent. He's being investigated for perjury. Everyone already knows he used performance enhancing drugs.
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: darkswordsman17
How can he be guilty if the stuff he used wasn't illegal/banned at the time he used it?
Is he an asshole? Undoubtedly, but you're deluding yourself if you think it wasn't everywhere (and still is to this day). I'm not saying its right, but its kinda stupid to throw a few under the bus when pretty much everyone involved is to blame. While the few who didn't use themselves will be hurt as well, they knew what was going on so they aren't exactly innocent either.
Also, stop calling it steroids. Its not the same thing.
Last thing, if you're going to have a thread about this, at least make it pertinent. He's being investigated for perjury. Everyone already knows he used performance enhancing drugs.
He's more guilty IMO than Pete Rose of cheating baseball and its fans.
Sure it may have been everywhere and those caught should face the same penalty. You will not catch every single one but you do prosecute those you do catch. Barry Bonds just happens to be one of them. Get over it.
"Performance enhancing drugs" "steroids" doesn't matter, same shit. You want to go find out which exact drug it was then have at it, everyone knows what is meant you are just nitpicking.
So it has been "proven" that he took "PERFORMANCE ENHANCING DRUGS"? I haven't heard of that.
Originally posted by: ric1287
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: darkswordsman17
How can he be guilty if the stuff he used wasn't illegal/banned at the time he used it?
Is he an asshole? Undoubtedly, but you're deluding yourself if you think it wasn't everywhere (and still is to this day). I'm not saying its right, but its kinda stupid to throw a few under the bus when pretty much everyone involved is to blame. While the few who didn't use themselves will be hurt as well, they knew what was going on so they aren't exactly innocent either.
Also, stop calling it steroids. Its not the same thing.
Last thing, if you're going to have a thread about this, at least make it pertinent. He's being investigated for perjury. Everyone already knows he used performance enhancing drugs.
He's more guilty IMO than Pete Rose of cheating baseball and its fans.
Sure it may have been everywhere and those caught should face the same penalty. You will not catch every single one but you do prosecute those you do catch. Barry Bonds just happens to be one of them. Get over it.
"Performance enhancing drugs" "steroids" doesn't matter, same shit. You want to go find out which exact drug it was then have at it, everyone knows what is meant you are just nitpicking.
So it has been "proven" that he took "PERFORMANCE ENHANCING DRUGS"? I haven't heard of that.
yet you still didn't answer his question.
How can you be guilty of something that wasn't illegal at the time? And them not being steroids IS important. HGH != steroids.
Thats like saying "heroin" "advil" doesn't matter, same shit.
Originally posted by: ric1287
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: darkswordsman17
How can he be guilty if the stuff he used wasn't illegal/banned at the time he used it?
Is he an asshole? Undoubtedly, but you're deluding yourself if you think it wasn't everywhere (and still is to this day). I'm not saying its right, but its kinda stupid to throw a few under the bus when pretty much everyone involved is to blame. While the few who didn't use themselves will be hurt as well, they knew what was going on so they aren't exactly innocent either.
Also, stop calling it steroids. Its not the same thing.
Last thing, if you're going to have a thread about this, at least make it pertinent. He's being investigated for perjury. Everyone already knows he used performance enhancing drugs.
He's more guilty IMO than Pete Rose of cheating baseball and its fans.
Sure it may have been everywhere and those caught should face the same penalty. You will not catch every single one but you do prosecute those you do catch. Barry Bonds just happens to be one of them. Get over it.
"Performance enhancing drugs" "steroids" doesn't matter, same shit. You want to go find out which exact drug it was then have at it, everyone knows what is meant you are just nitpicking.
So it has been "proven" that he took "PERFORMANCE ENHANCING DRUGS"? I haven't heard of that.
yet you still didn't answer his question.
How can you be guilty of something that wasn't illegal at the time? And them not being steroids IS important. HGH != steroids.
Thats like saying "heroin" "advil" doesn't matter, same shit.
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
arguOriginally posted by: ric1287
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: darkswordsman17
How can he be guilty if the stuff he used wasn't illegal/banned at the time he used it?
Is he an asshole? Undoubtedly, but you're deluding yourself if you think it wasn't everywhere (and still is to this day). I'm not saying its right, but its kinda stupid to throw a few under the bus when pretty much everyone involved is to blame. While the few who didn't use themselves will be hurt as well, they knew what was going on so they aren't exactly innocent either.
Also, stop calling it steroids. Its not the same thing.
Last thing, if you're going to have a thread about this, at least make it pertinent. He's being investigated for perjury. Everyone already knows he used performance enhancing drugs.
He's more guilty IMO than Pete Rose of cheating baseball and its fans.
Sure it may have been everywhere and those caught should face the same penalty. You will not catch every single one but you do prosecute those you do catch. Barry Bonds just happens to be one of them. Get over it.
"Performance enhancing drugs" "steroids" doesn't matter, same shit. You want to go find out which exact drug it was then have at it, everyone knows what is meant you are just nitpicking.
So it has been "proven" that he took "PERFORMANCE ENHANCING DRUGS"? I haven't heard of that.
yet you still didn't answer his question.
How can you be guilty of something that wasn't illegal at the time? And them not being steroids IS important. HGH != steroids.
Thats like saying "heroin" "advil" doesn't matter, same shit.
Would Barry Bonds be the sole homerun leader if it were not for those PERFORMANCE ENHANCING DRUGS? I do not think so. As to its legality, you can argue it wasn't illegal all day long. But now that it IS illegal, how are people who do not use PERFORMANCE ENHANCING DRUGS ever able to break the records set by those who did use it? Exactly. Its an uneven playing field.
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Would Barry Bonds be the sole homerun leader if it were not for those PERFORMANCE ENHANCING DRUGS? I do not think so. As to its legality, you can argue it wasn't illegal all day long. But now that it IS illegal, how are people who do not use PERFORMANCE ENHANCING DRUGS ever able to break the records set by those who did use it? Exactly. Its an uneven playing field.
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Would Barry Bonds be the sole homerun leader if it were not for those PERFORMANCE ENHANCING DRUGS? I do not think so. As to its legality, you can argue it wasn't illegal all day long. But now that it IS illegal, how are people who do not use PERFORMANCE ENHANCING DRUGS ever able to break the records set by those who did use it? Exactly. Its an uneven playing field.
hahahah, that's fucking stupid.
Should we invalidate all records from before Gatorade was invented? Unfair advantage to the current players!
Should we invalidate all records from players who play in parks that are easier to hit home runs in? Unfair advantage!
etc etc....its NEVER the same playing field in different eras. Deal with it.
Originally posted by: Jschmuck2
Terrible argument. All of baseball is an even playing field. The mound was higher in 1968. Ruth didn't have to play against black people, Aaron used amphetamines to keep up his stamina. The entire dead ball era - 154 games. To say that it creates an uneven playing field is nonsense.
Also, before Barry started juicing, he was a hall of fame player, no question. Erasing anyone's stats is fucking stupid. Back off of my sport ;P
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Would Barry Bonds be the sole homerun leader if it were not for those PERFORMANCE ENHANCING DRUGS? I do not think so. As to its legality, you can argue it wasn't illegal all day long. But now that it IS illegal, how are people who do not use PERFORMANCE ENHANCING DRUGS ever able to break the records set by those who did use it? Exactly. Its an uneven playing field.
hahahah, that's fucking stupid.
Should we invalidate all records from before Gatorade was invented? Unfair advantage to the current players!
Should we invalidate all records from players who play in parks that are easier to hit home runs in? Unfair advantage!
etc etc....its NEVER the same playing field in different eras. Deal with it.
Differance is none of what you just posted is against the law. And every player had those areas and items freely and legal.
Not even close.
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: darkswordsman17
How can he be guilty if the stuff he used wasn't illegal/banned at the time he used it?
Is he an asshole? Undoubtedly, but you're deluding yourself if you think it wasn't everywhere (and still is to this day). I'm not saying its right, but its kinda stupid to throw a few under the bus when pretty much everyone involved is to blame. While the few who didn't use themselves will be hurt as well, they knew what was going on so they aren't exactly innocent either.
Also, stop calling it steroids. Its not the same thing.
Last thing, if you're going to have a thread about this, at least make it pertinent. He's being investigated for perjury. Everyone already knows he used performance enhancing drugs.
He's more guilty IMO than Pete Rose of cheating baseball and its fans.
Sure it may have been everywhere and those caught should face the same penalty. You will not catch every single one but you do prosecute those you do catch. Barry Bonds just happens to be one of them. Get over it.
"Performance enhancing drugs" "steroids" doesn't matter, same shit. You want to go find out which exact drug it was then have at it, everyone knows what is meant you are just nitpicking.
So it has been "proven" that he took "PERFORMANCE ENHANCING DRUGS"? I haven't heard of that.
Originally posted by: darkswordsman17
No it is not nitpicking. Sorry if you can't understand the difference, but if you're going to go around trying to tear people down over it then at least fucking get it right. You sound like the atypical media dipshit labeling everything incorrectly just because OMG steroids gets more publicity.
It's not my fault you somehow construed it was factually (with evidence) proven that he took them when I didn't say that.
People need to get off their high horse. We may as well put an asterisk next to every athletes name as time goes on modern athletes reap the benefits of modern medicine/technology. There are a ton of athletes that wouldn't even have careers if it weren't for modern surgery/rehabilitation methods.
Records don't mean shit except when comparing to athletes of the same period of time. It doesn't make any sense to compare what Bonds accomplished with what Babe Ruth or Hank Aaron did.
Originally posted by: SunnyD
Who gives a shit? It's a game. The federal government shouldn't be wasting my tax dollars on it. PERIOD.
Originally posted by: rbV5
Even playing field?...Crist, he hit those home runs off juiced pitchers
Bonds walks alone proves him to be perhaps the greatest slugger of all time drugs or no. He faced better pitchers day in and out of ANY one else on the list, and he did it picking his pitches....who else even came close to that?
