Is Bacardi 151 the most caloric efficient way to get drunk?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Colt45

Lifer
Apr 18, 2001
19,720
1
0
you're a fuckin' idiot.

seriously.

pure (or as close to pure as you can get.. 95%) is going to be the least calories per cc of ethanol. Unless the filler is just water, then it is the same ratio, but weaker.



you need to compare calories in the amount of liquor required to get one pure ounce of alcohol, rather than calories per ounce of liquor
 

Quasmo

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2004
9,630
1
76
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
Originally posted by: Syringer
Everclear has 190 calories, and just slightly more alcohol than 151.

You did say caloric efficient.

:roll:

Caloric efficient drunkenness = Only consume calories from alcohol. Everclear has nearly 26% more alcohol by volume than 151. Rest assured you get no non alcohol derived calories.

BTW, I wouldn't recommend drinking Everclear straight. I've tasted it (when already thoroughly trashed) and it is positively wicked.

I've seen Nik do a double shot of pure Everclear, you know how he turned out.

On a side note I don't think the figure you're quoting for 151 is accurate. It simply can't be.

http://www.healthcentral.com/mhc/top/002446.cfm

Viper GTS
I've done an 8oz shot, on a bet. I puked blood.